Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
why the fuck are people voting against polls? what, are you guys thinking “you know, as nice as this sounds, i would rather not have more options on things we can do on this sight. i want LESS features we can use."
Gotta agree with my idiotic brother on that one. Polls would only improve the site. So whatever fool is voting against them should be slapped around a little.
derdev789 wrote:
Gotta agree with my idiotic brother on that one. Polls would only improve the site. So whatever fool is voting against them should be slapped around a little.
It’s Nazi Spy playing around with Bjarne again.
WEB MASTER wrote:
TiZ AlwayZ Someone Around To Show You Your FLAWS In This Site Me Ole Mucker
derdev789 wrote:
Gotta agree with my idiotic brother on that one. Polls would only improve the site. So whatever fool is voting against them should be slapped around a little.
It’s Nazi Spy playing around with Bjarne again.
WEB MASTER wrote:
TiZ AlwayZ Someone Around To Show You Your FLAWS In This Site Me Ole Mucker
lol the sonovabitch found a hole.
Haha
hahahaha. well, in that case, its fine. nazi will be nazi. . i’m kinda glad to see him back. haven’t seen him for a while.
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Haha, someone is trying to make a statement with voting no
I can also limit the vote to ONE per user account OR IP address. This would make it significantly harder for a person with multiple user accounts to vote more than once in each poll. The disadvantage is sometimes a given person may be denied the ability to vote because someone using the same proxy/IP as them has already done so...
Regarding the high amount of 'no' votes. It’s rather simple. Each user has one vote in each poll. If you have registered 10 different user accounts then you can basically vote 10 times on each poll. I think it’s more or less the same person that has made almost if not all of the 'no' votes (unless there is some kind of bug...).
As I said in another post here, I can ALSO limit it to one vote per poll per IP address, but that would affect innocent people in some cases (I have no idea how often).
Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
Regarding the high amount of 'no' votes. It’s rather simple. Each user has one vote in each poll. If you have registered 10 different user accounts then you can basically vote 10 times on each poll. I think it’s more or less the same person that has made almost if not all of the 'no' votes (unless there is some kind of bug...).
As I said in another post here, I can ALSO limit it to one vote per poll per IP address, but that would affect innocent people in some cases (I have no idea how often).
Would kill me and Kev, because we being brothers in the same house share the same IP address.
»
Feedback
» Will this webpoll thing be a good addition???
. i’m kinda glad to see him back. haven’t seen him for a while.
oh well, it would be nice to have a poll
