Xtrm Liability wrote:
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “demolition” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism.
[oops]
---
Last edited 13 Aug 2007 03:28 am by bAyBeE_ChRoNiC
Xtrm Liability wrote:
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “demolition” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism.
Even MORE so,with my own research, the “Pancake theory” still wouldn’t allow the towers to fall at freefall speeds, the towers fell at an average of 10 floors per second.
You hit the nail on the head!
---
Last edited 13 Aug 2007 11:48 am by Xtrm Liability
You know, first time I heard it referred to “erection drawing”, I laughed. Erection Drawings are basically like an instruction manual on how to build/erect the building. It identifies where each “member” lol, is located. Kind of like an instruction book on how to build a tent identifying each piece and where they go.
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
I still honestly dont believe that it was some big conspiracy. I just think the government fucked up, and their own incompetence caused it.
Yeah I dont think it was some military jet or missle that flew into the WTC but I do believe they had something to do with it, and the passengers all died its not like there wasn’t any dead people.
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
I still honestly dont believe that it was some big conspiracy. I just think the government fucked up, and their own incompetence caused it.
Yeah I dont think it was some military jet or missle that flew into the WTC but I do believe they had something to do with it, and the passengers all died its not like there wasn’t any dead people.
Alright, so you actually believe a passenger plane flew into the building? Just read the article thoroughly.
Xtrm Liability wrote:
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “demolition” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism.
Even MORE so,with my own research, the “Pancake theory” still wouldn’t allow the towers to fall at freefall speeds, the towers fell at an average of 10 floors per second.
You hit the nail on the head!
Wait a second Xtrm, you seem to be saying two different things. Your first post makes it sound like you don’t believe the conspiracy theories, and your response to Baybee makes it sound like you do...
There is no doubt that building 7 was a controlled demolition I also believe the other were controlled demo as well by the way they collapsed in perfect harmony with respect to other surrounding real estate. Looking at the pancake floor collapse, it seems very unlikely the Structural integrity of the building would buckle “evenly” and consistently throughout all the floor beams when the impact was pretty minor on one side of the building in comparison the size of the building. I’d say the Pancake collapse is highly unlikely, where as a “Lean to” collapse would seem more fitting given where the building was struck. Also the heat temperature of the steel many hours after the incident is very fishy which could only be caused my demolition charges.
Xtrm Liability wrote:
There is no doubt that building 7 was a controlled demolition I also believe the other were controlled demo as well by the way they collapsed in perfect harmony with respect to other surrounding real estate. Looking at the pancake floor collapse, it seems very unlikely the Structural integrity of the building would buckle “evenly” and consistently throughout all the floor beams when the impact was pretty minor on one side of the building in comparison the size of the building. I’d say the Pancake collapse is highly unlikely, where as a “Lean to” collapse would seem more fitting given where the building was struck. Also the heat temperature of the steel many hours after the incident is very fishy which could only be caused my demolition charges.
Xtrm Liability wrote:
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “demolition” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism.
Even MORE so,with my own research, the “Pancake theory” still wouldn’t allow the towers to fall at freefall speeds, the towers fell at an average of 10 floors per second.
You hit the nail on the head!
Wait a second Xtrm, you seem to be saying two different things. Your first post makes it sound like you don’t believe the conspiracy theories, and your response to Baybee makes it sound like you do...
Which is it?
That came out wrong.
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “collapse” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism. [/controlled demolition]
Xtrm Liability wrote:
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “demolition” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism.
Even MORE so,with my own research, the “Pancake theory” still wouldn’t allow the towers to fall at freefall speeds, the towers fell at an average of 10 floors per second.
You hit the nail on the head!
Wait a second Xtrm, you seem to be saying two different things. Your first post makes it sound like you don’t believe the conspiracy theories, and your response to Baybee makes it sound like you do...
Which is it?
That came out wrong.
Oh, and just to stir shit up... In my professional opinion, I do look at the “collapse” of the 9/11 world trade center buildings with skepticism. [/controlled demolition]
noo way. ppl died in that D.
You dint seriously thing that Errr well maybe but do you realy think that
»
Off-Topic
» Xtrm's Job
