| 13 Aug 2007 02:33 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 12  Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 4,094 OFFLINE | yep
| |
 | | 13 Aug 2007 02:43 am |
Assassin Rep: 19  Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 6,589 OFFLINE | no it doesnt!
--- .... | | | 13 Aug 2007 03:52 am |
M v C Graphics Designer Rep: 14  Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,080 OFFLINE | i can’t think of one way the wii owns the ps3 as a console
---
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 03:53 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | PS3 will just tip over and it’s weight would crush the wii.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 03:58 am |
M v C Graphics Designer Rep: 14  Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,080 OFFLINE | and wii will warm the ps3s feet since wii makes a nice foot warmer
---
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:03 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | lol
The first thing you take when going to Antarctica is take a 360, ps3, and wii, and a small/light generator.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:10 am |
M v C Graphics Designer Rep: 14  Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,080 OFFLINE | 360 for blowing warm air through the room, wii for warming your feet, and ps3 for warming your hands with a light breeze
---
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:12 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | light breeze? lol
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:14 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:20 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | price is the direct result of sales... thats fact.
Thats why everyone doesn’t own an expensive pc that can run crysis, rather then owning some 250$ or 400$ or 600$ console that gives sub-par results.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:25 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | NEREVAR117 wrote:
price is the direct result of sales... thats fact.
Thats why everyone doesn’t own an expensive pc that can run crysis, rather then owning some 250$ or 400$ or 600$ console that gives sub-par results.
I guess that the definition of a “good console” is what is being called into question. If you want to have a console with the power of a computer, then you better be prepared to pay the price, if you (which sales seem to reflect) want a system that plays, I dunno, VIDEO GAMES, then you shouldn’t have to pay very much. God I miss the days of the NES.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:26 am |
M v C Graphics Designer Rep: 14  Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,080 OFFLINE | derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
---
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:27 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:29 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:34 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
But the reason people don’t have a crysis pump is because it’s too expensive, when anything is so expensive that it doesn’t sell well it has failed the supply and demand system and as such the company will feel the pain. The PS3 is the same way, of course it would be on top if it cost the same as the Wii, with all the gadgets inside it people would have to be stupid not to buy it if it cost 200$ (Hell I’d buy it just to use it as a blue ray player), but realistically, it doesn’t cost 200$, and because of that the company is suffering from poor sales and might scrap the system, which for those of you that know your stuff, means the PS3 won’t get new games, won’t get new “toys” and will be a waist of money for whoever bought it.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:38 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
But the reason people don’t have a crysis pump is because it’s too expensive, when anything is so expensive that it doesn’t sell well it has failed the supply and demand system and as such the company will feel the pain. The PS3 is the same way, of course it would be on top if it cost the same as the Wii, with all the gadgets inside it people would have to be stupid not to buy it if it cost 200$ (Hell I’d buy it just to use it as a blue ray player), but realistically, it doesn’t cost 200$, and because of that the company is suffering from poor sales and might scrap the system, which for those of you that know your stuff, means the PS3 won’t get new games, won’t get new “toys” and will be a waist of money for whoever bought it.
So... i’m assuming you agree with what i said?
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:40 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
But the reason people don’t have a crysis pump is because it’s too expensive, when anything is so expensive that it doesn’t sell well it has failed the supply and demand system and as such the company will feel the pain. The PS3 is the same way, of course it would be on top if it cost the same as the Wii, with all the gadgets inside it people would have to be stupid not to buy it if it cost 200$ (Hell I’d buy it just to use it as a blue ray player), but realistically, it doesn’t cost 200$, and because of that the company is suffering from poor sales and might scrap the system, which for those of you that know your stuff, means the PS3 won’t get new games, won’t get new “toys” and will be a waist of money for whoever bought it.
So... i’m assuming you agree with what i said?
I agree that if the PS3 droped in price it would be in the lead by far. But because of mistakes made by the Sony team, the system has no chance of sucessfully droping the price and making a profit. Ugh you know what sucks? I might have to intern at Sony, I HATE Sony as a company.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:43 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
But the reason people don’t have a crysis pump is because it’s too expensive, when anything is so expensive that it doesn’t sell well it has failed the supply and demand system and as such the company will feel the pain. The PS3 is the same way, of course it would be on top if it cost the same as the Wii, with all the gadgets inside it people would have to be stupid not to buy it if it cost 200$ (Hell I’d buy it just to use it as a blue ray player), but realistically, it doesn’t cost 200$, and because of that the company is suffering from poor sales and might scrap the system, which for those of you that know your stuff, means the PS3 won’t get new games, won’t get new “toys” and will be a waist of money for whoever bought it.
So... i’m assuming you agree with what i said?
I agree that if the PS3 droped in price it would be in the lead by far. But because of mistakes made by the Sony team, the system has no chance of sucessfully droping the price and making a profit. Ugh you know what sucks? I might have to intern at Sony, I HATE Sony as a company.
Oh... ok... so you are agreeing with me... as i agree with what you said.
Sony actually made one fatal flaw... they thought since the ps2 did good, they thought the ps3, no matter the cost, would do good too.
They didn’t use strategy... they just took a bet and hoped it worked....
Retards.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:45 am |
King of MVC Rep: 26  Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,489 OFFLINE | NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
derdev789 wrote:
http://www.vgchartz.com/
That’s where it owns.
The Wii has sold 10.10M consoles, while the PS3 has sold a measly 4.11M consoles. If the majority of people thought the PS3 was better, than the majority of people would have bought it and the sales of a product are a direct result of customer satisfaction. I rest my fucking case.
i said as a console
If the PS3 owned so much, people would buy it.
I already told you, a crysis comp can be in the thousands of $$, and many people would love to have something like that for gaming, but the price turns people away.
If the ps3 was the same price as the wii, it would prob be in the lead.
But the reason people don’t have a crysis pump is because it’s too expensive, when anything is so expensive that it doesn’t sell well it has failed the supply and demand system and as such the company will feel the pain. The PS3 is the same way, of course it would be on top if it cost the same as the Wii, with all the gadgets inside it people would have to be stupid not to buy it if it cost 200$ (Hell I’d buy it just to use it as a blue ray player), but realistically, it doesn’t cost 200$, and because of that the company is suffering from poor sales and might scrap the system, which for those of you that know your stuff, means the PS3 won’t get new games, won’t get new “toys” and will be a waist of money for whoever bought it.
So... i’m assuming you agree with what i said?
I agree that if the PS3 droped in price it would be in the lead by far. But because of mistakes made by the Sony team, the system has no chance of sucessfully droping the price and making a profit. Ugh you know what sucks? I might have to intern at Sony, I HATE Sony as a company.
Oh... ok... so you are agreeing with me... as i agree with what you said.
Sony actually made one fatal flaw... they thought since the ps2 did good, they thought the ps3, no matter the cost, would do good too.
They didn’t use strategy... they just took a bet and hoped it worked....
Retards.
Agreed, very retarted. And I really want to intern at a specific video game company, but Sony is easier to get an interning job at... Ugh this blows.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | | | 13 Aug 2007 04:46 am |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 66  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,659 OFFLINE | Sony as a company id good, it’s really just the game department that is under drug influence.
--- I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe
 | |
|
Post Reply - Next Page |
|