| 18 Sep 2007 11:41 am |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 47  Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,736 OFFLINE | I don’t think so, I mean, science is made by logic and proof while, religion, is made by mystical belief and where logic can’t fit at all
Comments?
BTW tell us if ur a “believer” or a man of logic or woman
---
Can Science and Religion Co-exist? Yes ************** 53% (votes so far 17) No ************ 47% (votes so far 15) Only registered users may vote.
 
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
 |
| 18 Sep 2007 01:44 pm |
King of MVC Rep: 23 Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,475 OFFLINE | zeta_evolved wrote:
I don’t think so, I mean, science is made by logic and proof while, religion, is made by mystical belief and where logic can’t fit at all
Comments?
BTW tell us if ur a “believer” or a man of logic or woman
Cause believers can’t be men and women of logic? My bad. I guess I should stop going to college, taking physics and learning to write in C++ cause I’m not a man of “logic”. Thank you for your insight my friend, you show a clear understanding of all people of faith and should be allowed the opportunity to judge freely with broad demeaning terms.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | |
| 18 Sep 2007 02:59 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | No, religion and science will never go together. Not as long as there are religious beliefs that will go against science. Religion shouldn’t be trying to play in the realm of science.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
 | |
| 18 Sep 2007 03:58 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 46 Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 38,445 OFFLINE | Of course not. Cause as science continues to diminish and put down old religious theories there is no way that most of those old religions can last.
As I like to say, people aren’t the same gullable idiots they use to be, they are now gullable idiots with media.
---
 
It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 18 Sep 2007 06:48 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 6 Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3,602 OFFLINE | clearly
---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it." | |
| 18 Sep 2007 07:56 pm |
Evil incarnate Rep: 26 Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 6,239 ONLINE | I say yes.
As long as you aren’t some kind of fundamentalist, then yes.
There are ways for one to intertwine current scientific knowledge into theistic beliefs. I’ve done so myself. I’ve basically come up with my own beliefs BASED ON Christianity and the Bible.
---
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me.
(Psalm 23:4) | |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:24 pm |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 47Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,736 OFFLINE | for those who say totally yes
not u maggot
if u consider your self a man of science or woman
u will have to make a choice
to believe that life was created by god
or to follow the scientific way
u can’t be both
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:25 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 46Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 38,445 OFFLINE | Science will be able to go as far as saying that everything in religion is false aside on how the universe was created. Otherwise most everything else can be proven scientifically. So I guess if people wanted to be diest that would work. But the whole other thing man science eventually will be able to knock all this down. Well don’t know if people will believe it but yea it will.
---
It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:26 pm |
Reanimated Rep: 37 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 7,999 | Maggot Face wrote:
I say yes.
As long as you aren’t some kind of fundamentalist, then yes.
There are ways for one to intertwine current scientific knowledge into theistic beliefs. I’ve done so myself. I’ve basically come up with my own beliefs BASED ON Christianity and the Bible.
Ditto. I think it’s proof that they can coexist, if given enough leniency.
---
-={Amin Wile Ilyamenie Liy End Rimmi Llie}=- | |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:26 pm |
Live like an angel, die like a devil Rep: 20 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 12,757 OFFLINE | Rejection of evolution science isnt a rejection of all science. In all honesty, coming from an atheist, there isnt proof that god does not exist.
---
 | |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:38 pm |
Evil incarnate Rep: 26Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 6,239 ONLINE | fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Rejection of evolution science isnt a rejection of all science. In all honesty, coming from an atheist, there isnt proof that god does not exist.
Additionally, theistic belief doesn’t mean rejection of the Theory of Evolution. I don’t reject it.
---
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me.
(Psalm 23:4) | |
| 18 Sep 2007 09:49 pm |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 47Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,736 OFFLINE | fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Rejection of evolution science isnt a rejection of all science. In all honesty, coming from an atheist, there isnt proof that god does not exist.
but there’s no proof he exists
I mean Jesus did not leave a clear trail neither did Mohammed
or Abraham of their existance
btw
did any of u guys watched CNN’s
God’s Warriors
I loved that show
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:07 pm |
Regular Rep: 0  Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 913 OFFLINE | I don’t understand how holding two of every single animal on a ship for 40 days and 40 nights is logical. That means that Noahs ark would have had to hold about at LEAST 5,000 thousand species of animals, with enough fresh water and food to last them 40 days and 40 nights.
That is quite illogical.
---
 | |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:08 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | The probability of god existing is very thin. Think of him as the ultimate Boeing 747.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
| |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:10 pm |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 47Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,736 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
The probability of god existing is very thin. Think of him as the ultimate Boeing 747.
yep
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:11 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | the117gamer wrote:
I don’t understand how holding two of every single animal on a ship for 40 days and 40 nights is logical. That means that Noahs ark would have had to hold about at LEAST 5,000 thousand species of animals, with enough fresh water and food to last them 40 days and 40 nights.
That is quite illogical.
Haha, 1115 illogical absurdities when you look at Skeptic’s Annotated Bible.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
| |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:27 pm |
Evil incarnate Rep: 26Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 6,239 ONLINE | I went into the whole logic thing previously. Matt disregarded it because I made a point against his argument.
---
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me.
(Psalm 23:4) | |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:54 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 20 Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 3,403 OFFLINE | I think the problem with this question is that it is inherently based on a few assumptions:
All peoples of the same faith follow and believe the same things
All peoples of “no faith” follow and believe the same things.
But we know that’s just not true. People choose to follow their religion in a way that meets their spiritually and logical needs.
Not every Christian believes literally in the Noah’s ark story.
Not every scientist believes in evolution.
Albert Einstein is a good example of science and religion mixing together if only because everybody knows who he is;
Einstein was very much a believer in God; but I doubt anyone can say he didn’t contribute a great deal to science.
I’ve just started reading a book by the Dalai Lama entitled: The Universe in a Single Atom...the convergence of science and spirituality.
I do see the need for separation though. Given that religion is so personal and not held to empirical evidence, I don’t think it’s a good idea for spirituality to try and make scientific “truths”.
But can they co-exist? Yes: they have, do, and probably will for a long time.
---
You hear that? It’s the sound of Godzilla! Vote Now!!!! | |
| 18 Sep 2007 11:57 pm |
The Stampede Rep: 70 Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 43,567 OFFLINE | I believe they can coexist together. The reason they don’t is because of the extremist FROM BOTH SIDES.
I myself believe in both science and religion. I combine the two in order to gain a better understanding of the universe around me.
---
^ made by Skittles <3 | |
| 19 Sep 2007 02:22 am |
King of MVC Rep: 23Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 8,475 OFFLINE | zeta_evolved wrote:
for those who say totally yes
not u maggot
if u consider your self a man of science or woman
u will have to make a choice
to believe that life was created by god
or to follow the scientific way
u can’t be both
Define the “scientific way”, because if you really want to be critical the scientific way is testing theories under various conditions using the scientific formula, and using this method to discover things about the universe.
I think by Scientific Way you are talking about blanket belief in all broad scientific idea’s, which in a way is a religion unto itself. I’m sorry if I’m a little bit skeptical of Evolution, but if you dig deep, if you actually think about it for a nanosecond before blindly accepting it, you will realize there are as many holes and flaws as there are in religion. So I’m sorry if I disagree with some of your beliefs, but that in no way means you can tell me I am not a man of science.
---
THE KING HAS RETURNED! | |
|
Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Religion
» Can Science and Religion Co-exist?
First 
