| 28 Oct 2007 12:47 am |
KAXSH Guest | I’m just saying why the hell must we sit through that class {this class we’ve taken sence kindergarden} whats the point of taking it again in high school.
| |
 |
| 28 Oct 2007 12:49 am |
OWNED BY SA-X Rep: 62  Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 13,669 OFFLINE | To learn to read and write.
---
 | |
| 28 Oct 2007 12:50 am |
Ace of 'Nades Rep: 60  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,841 OFFLINE | To perfect reading and writing.
---
 | |
| 28 Oct 2007 01:03 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 27  Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 3,730 OFFLINE | Because many Americans have horrible grammar and spellings.
---
 | |
| 29 Oct 2007 11:36 am |
Maggot NLI Guest | To attempt to make English speakers not look like TOTAL morons.
| |
| 29 Oct 2007 08:21 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 14  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,392 OFFLINE | Because you probably don’t know what appositives, prepositional phrases, or adverbial phrases are. You would do terribly if you were told to underline the verb in a sentence and not even realize the verb is more than one word. You probably would identify a noun as the direct object if it were in a prepositional phrase. Do even know what part of speech “tomorrow” is without looking it up?
Our English teacher is showing us how terrible we are at English grammar. All of her classes-standard, honors, and even AP-know shit about grammar.
---
Haruhi demands you join the MvC Otakus | |
| 29 Oct 2007 08:22 pm |
Ace of 'Nades Rep: 60  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,841 OFFLINE | Is tomorrow a pronoun?
---
 | |
| 29 Oct 2007 08:28 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 14  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,392 OFFLINE | Red_Calibur9 wrote:
Is tomorrow a pronoun?
No.
Adverb.
It identifies when you did something. It modifies a verb.
---
Haruhi demands you join the MvC Otakus | |
| 31 Oct 2007 09:40 pm |
SQUiP? Rep: 58  Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 10,229 OFFLINE | I don’t needs to takes no langage artz. Me spelling an gramar are perfict alredy.
---
 | |
| 04 Nov 2007 11:15 pm |
bahaha--its me Guest | why do we have to take british literature(english 12)? fukin im not british!!
| |
| 04 Nov 2007 11:25 pm |
Ace of 'Nades Rep: 60  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,841 OFFLINE | omg... british literature?
---
 | |
| 05 Nov 2007 01:10 am |
OWNED BY SA-X Rep: 62  Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 13,669 OFFLINE | Because they tell you to..
Now just do what you’re told.
---
 | |
| 05 Nov 2007 01:13 am |
MvC's Vampiric Sovereign Rep: 48  Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 14,841 OFFLINE | no, stick it to the man!!!!!!
---

Endrance wrote:
I don’t want to be alone anymore. I don’t want to lose anything. Ever again!
| |
| 05 Nov 2007 01:17 am |
OWNED BY SA-X Rep: 62  Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 13,669 OFFLINE | SHUT UP AND DO YOUR WORK!
Rebel for life.
---
 | |
| 28 Nov 2007 12:50 pm |
Becca Guest | I just stumbled across this accidentally on Google and thought I’d add that you’re living proof of why you need these lessons You think that 'why do we have to take language arts for' is an acceptable sentence! Also, you don’t appear to know how to use apostrophes, or spell the words 'since' or 'kindergarten'.
I think you need to start paying more attention in those classes!
| |
| 28 Nov 2007 12:52 pm |
Becca Guest | Also, sorry for double posting but 'tomorrow' a pronoun? I fear for the intelligence of my generation.
| |
| 01 Dec 2007 03:40 am |
bahaha--its me Guest | my english teacher thinks “century” is a concrete noun. i am the only person in my class, hell i think im her only student that says its abstract.
im all for better grammar but british lit? so boring.
| |
| 03 Dec 2007 06:18 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 14  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,392 OFFLINE | Why in God’s name would century, which defines a period of 100 years, be abstract?
Unless you want to debate the nature of time, but that’s not really something you’d do in literature.
---
Haruhi demands you join the MvC OtakusLast edited 03 Dec 2007 06:19 pm by RageOverdose | |
| 03 Dec 2007 06:22 pm |
Ace of 'Nades Rep: 60  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,841 OFFLINE | Why are we not allowed to use “theirselves” and “hisself/herself”? It makes more sense than “themselves” many times.
---
 | |
| 03 Dec 2007 06:39 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 14  Joined: 26 Aug 2005 Posts: 4,392 OFFLINE | Red_Calibur9 wrote:
Why are we not allowed to use “theirselves” and “hisself/herself”? It makes more sense than “themselves” many times.
“Herself” is actually correct because her is objective, but hers is the possessive form. “Hisself” wouldn’t make sense because “his” is possessive.
In fact, what you said makes no sense, because you don’t actually know why.
When you say “He hurt himself," you aren’t using “himself” as a possessive noun, but rather as a direct object. “His” is a possessive pronoun, not an object. “Him” is an objective pronoun, and since the one being hurt is him, but he’s doing to his being, then its a direct object, the noun being “himself."
There was probably a simpler way to explain it, and more proper names for it, but there you go.
---
Haruhi demands you join the MvC OtakusLast edited 03 Dec 2007 06:45 pm by RageOverdose | |
|
Post Reply - Next Page |