HUEY FREEMAN wrote:
WHAT KINDA QUESTION IS THAT. I WILL SAY THIS I’M NOT WHITE, AND ALTHOUGH THEY ARE THE CAUSE OF OUR PROBLEMS DUE TO THE WHITE RULED RACIST GOVERNMENT SYSTEM IN WHICH WE LIVE, WE MUST TRY TO DIVERSIFY THE SYSTEM RATHER THAN UNIFY IT. OH, AND IF YOU ARE NOT WHITE YOU CANNOT BE RACIST. RACISM IS A SYSTEM OF ADVANTAGE BASED ON RACE, THEREFORE ONLY WHITES CAN BE RACIST. ALL WHITES ARE RACIST!! SOME WHITES ARE PASSIVE RACIST (THOSE WHO DON’T TRY TO BE CHANGE THE SYSTEM), SOME ARE ADVOCATE OR PRO RACIST (THOSE WHO TRY TO REINFORCE THE RACIST SYSTEM IN WHICH WE LIVE), THEN THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE ANTI-RACIST(THOSE WHO ARE AGAINST THE RACIST GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND TRYING TO CHANGE IT), NONE THE LESS RACIST BECAUSE THEY RECIEVE THE BENIFTS AND PRIVLEGES THAT GO ALONG WITH LIVING IN RACIST GOVERNMENT SYSTEM. WHITES ARE TO BLAME FOR THE UNEQUAL OPPORTUNITES PRESENTED IN AMERICA. IF YOU NEED ME TO EXPLAIN HOW OPPORTUNITES BASED ON RACE ARE UNEQUAL, LET ME KNOW. I CAN DO THAT! YA DIG!
You are an idiot. There is no need for explanation here. You are just a racist pillock.
My stepmums Dad was a journalist in south africa for a little while (After serving in the SAS :P)
He was asked to write an article about what would have happened if “Evil White Man” had never come to South Africa.
It went (Very roughly) like this:
“The native tribes of Africa lived happily out on the plains. They lived blissful lives without the stresses of “School” or “Government”. wars were rare, because none of the tribes lived near enough to another to fight. People starved in famine, died of disease and were killed by drought, but it was alright, because they died free.
Then, one day, people in metal birds with yellow skin arrived on the plains. They were from a place called “Chy-Na” and they brought disease and destruction with them. Many of the tribeswere destroyed, and Africa was enslaved.
But all this was OK, because the Africans had finally found what they had been looking for all these years.
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Extermination of the entire human race would do wonders for this planet :/
What’s the point of having a planet without humans anyway?
1. We arent melting it
2. We arent killing the other species
3. We arent cutting up the habitat
4. We arent buliding are bloody cities all over the place
The planet would be much better without us. Lol.
It would be boring and barbaric with no culture. Fuck animals. Humans first. The reason we should be protecting the environment is to save ourselves in the short term so we can colonize other planets, because in the long run all the one planet species on this planet will die out and we with it. Sure, at the moment we’re threats, but in the future we could be the ones who really make the universe a better place.
--- WHUT DA FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARK?
Last edited 14 Aug 2008 07:39 am by Sean of the Living
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Extermination of the entire human race would do wonders for this planet :/
What’s the point of having a planet without humans anyway?
1. We arent melting it
2. We arent killing the other species
3. We arent cutting up the habitat
4. We arent buliding are bloody cities all over the place
The planet would be much better without us. Lol.
It would be boring and barbaric with no culture. Fuck animals. Humans first. The reason we should be protecting the environment is to save ourselves in the short term so we can colonize other planets, because in the long run all the one planet species on this planet will die out and we with it. Sure, at the moment we’re threats, but in the future we could be the ones who really make the universe a better place.
Virus much? :P And when you say a “better place”... you mean better for ourselves... right?
Just a random piece of information. The majority of African slaves that were shipped to America to be sold were not exactly “captured”. The vast majority were actually sold and traded away by their own people.
Also, as for Africa being left solely to Africa without the interference of other continents. There were tons of little tribal wars going on through out all the countries. Zulus man! Don’t forget those badass Mo-Fos! Yes, Africa is huge and the boundries between tribe territories are giant, but food doesn’t stay plentiful in a single area in Africa. Most tribes have to keep moving, which causes them to eventually run into someone else’s territory that IS bountiful. This is when the skirmishes take place. Tribes were at war quite often because certain groups had to share the resources that make an area livable.
So even if it was left alone, does not mean there would be peace per-say.
I’m curious how many African Americans, if given the choice, would choose to live in the old-days “tribal Africa” rather than staying “here” in modern America.
Now I’m not saying that “here” is better, but how many people do you know that would actually choose to leave it?
Khorib wrote:
Just a random piece of information. The majority of African slaves that were shipped to America to be sold were not exactly “captured”. The vast majority were actually sold and traded away by their own people.
Also, as for Africa being left solely to Africa without the interference of other continents. There were tons of little tribal wars going on through out all the countries. Zulus man! Don’t forget those badass Mo-Fos! Yes, Africa is huge and the boundries between tribe territories are giant, but food doesn’t stay plentiful in a single area in Africa. Most tribes have to keep moving, which causes them to eventually run into someone else’s territory that IS bountiful. This is when the skirmishes take place. Tribes were at war quite often because certain groups had to share the resources that make an area livable.
So even if it was left alone, does not mean there would be peace per-say.
I’m curious how many African Americans, if given the choice, would choose to live in the old-days “tribal Africa” rather than staying “here” in modern America.
Now I’m not saying that “here” is better, but how many people do you know that would actually choose to leave it?
That’s just speculative. I mean, a person growing up in a tribal-based community may never want for a different lifestyle, just as the person growing up in a built-up city may love their way of living.
Or they could both hate where and how they live.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
There’s nothing wrong with either agreeing or disagreeing with past actions, but since they are in the past, the excerise seems somewhat futile (beyond learning from past experiances).
I think it’s more important to focus on what actions are being taken presently.
History may have shaped where we are now, but the future is still up to us.
you kno wat it is a racist comment but people act like white people are kindda being the minorties but we still run everything. all poltics are in r favor obama wins hell b dead in a month
»
Politics
» Extermination of White People?
me=destinyguy678
