| 06 Jan 2008 12:30 am |
Regular Rep: 2 Joined: 03 Nov 2007 Posts: 520 OFFLINE | Uninvited wrote:
Green_Ninja wrote:
Eragon was a horrid book. There were so many things wrong with it, I can’t even begin to explain..
For one, a 15 yr old wrote it, and I was 15 when I read it. It was CLEARLY written by a child. So many problems, no detail, no creativity.. It was basically a bunch of books crammed together. Come on, dude.. Write an original, it’s exactly the same as all the other mainstream Fantasy out there.
Harry Potter was good as a child fantasy story.. When I was younger I loved it.. Now, though.. My taste has changed a bit.. I no longer crave a simple plot that always turns out the same in every book. I don’t like predictable. and I DEFIANTLY don’t like writing for money. Which is EXACTLY what JKR did after the 4th book. =/
So actually, both suck. 
You are all to true with Eragon... but you forgot to mention that it was BORING!!!! I honestly fell asleep in the first 10 pages... the only reason people liked it was that there was a lot of hype, and that a 15 year old wrote a book! ooooh... look at me... i’m 15 and i can write a crappy book! yay!!! whatever, i even liked harry potter better than that... and i’m not a huge fan... i really only liked the last book...
Acuttally alot of people like it because all the blood and gore and violence.you have to read the prolouge.Also read up to the part where Eragon learns to sword fight and learn to use magic.
| |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply |
Moderated by: Admins, Superusers
First Last ]
»
Literature
» Wich is better eragon or harry potter?
