Zucas wrote:
LittleBigPlanet is simply a combo of numerous ideas before it but in a very cool way.
Yep and what I am saying is when people notice the graphics the very first thing they will prolly say is wow look at how real that skateboard looks When people play Galaxy it is wow look at those textures and how do they do those artistic designs with the planets?
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^^^^^You fail to realize that SMG graphics aren’t supposed to look photo realistic, it is supposed to be art of a cartoon and how it is done, it looks amazing! SMG isn’t supposed to be very technical with its looks, with LBP.....graphics are like the huge point in how the game works....
So? LBP Still looks better.
Thats the point with LBP.......so you say wow that looks so real
I never said it looks real.
Then what the hell else is there to say about it LMAO?
It looks better then SMG. And has better physics, and is more interactive, etc.
Over_Lord92 wrote:
This game could be done on the Wii. What if we steal it!
No it couldn’t.
It could it just wouldn’t have as many animations. It looks like it could have a better anti-aliasing mechanism in place since all the pics including the one above, of little big planet, look very jagged. You really can’t compare R and C for PS3 looks much better than SMG and I think SMG is one of the best looking games this year.
PS. Halo 3 should not have gotten a 10 in any review.
the wii outstands particually in one area. lighting. the lighting is almost as capable as the 360s. thats why smg has such incredible lighting. but the rest of the wii is pretty much last gen so thats why smg had to go with that style
P. Moore wrote:
the wii outstands particually in one area. lighting. the lighting is almost as capable as the 360s. thats why smg has such incredible lighting. but the rest of the wii is pretty much last gen so thats why smg had to go with that style
LOL
Do you honestly think the Wii can perform as many shaders as the 360?