zeta_evolved wrote:
u r going to hate me for this
but that’s Rebeca, she’s the one that mods with her feelings
Etain might have had a few slips but god, I trust her more that I trust Ninja, mod-wise
specially cuz she has experience
now
so I’m the one showing the immature behavior funny u say I’m not the one supporting hatred and the idea of mocking ppl
guess if trying to keep respect alive here makes me immature so be it
I don’t care
and the thread did deserved to be locked just for the mere fact of it mocking ppl a.k.a. Racism
GN has been modding strictly by the rules..
Etain is the one that removed a signature image that didn’t need to be removed and locked a thread on her own personal feelings.. I’m not trying to be rude.. But it’s the truth. I like Etain, she does her job well.. But she’s too touchy when it comes to certain subjects.
zeta_evolved wrote:
eh...
ur opinion I respect it
but I stand straight to everything I’ve said
I respect your opinion as well.. But that doesn’t mean it’s right.
I was once a moderator here... So I know the extent of the rules fairly well, and I can say without a doubt that the thread was in violation of 0 rules and was locked on personal feelings in the subject.
zeta_evolved wrote:
eh...
ur opinion I respect it
but I stand straight to everything I’ve said
I respect your opinion as well.. But that doesn’t mean it’s right.
I was once a moderator here... So I know the extent of the rules fairly well, and I can say without a doubt that the thread was in violation of 0 rules and was locked on personal feelings in the subject.
Look Cid, don’t bring the “locked cuz of feelings” u r not in any position to do so.
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
zeta_evolved wrote:
eh...
ur opinion I respect it
but I stand straight to everything I’ve said
I respect your opinion as well.. But that doesn’t mean it’s right.
I was once a moderator here... So I know the extent of the rules fairly well, and I can say without a doubt that the thread was in violation of 0 rules and was locked on personal feelings in the subject.
Look Cid, don’t bring the “locked cuz of feelings” u r not in any position to do so.
What was that?
I don’t even know where you’re going with that remark. But it’s true. The thread was not lock for any violation of the rules. You’re the only person who seems to think it was right now too.
zeta_evolved wrote:
eh...
ur opinion I respect it
but I stand straight to everything I’ve said
I respect your opinion as well.. But that doesn’t mean it’s right.
I was once a moderator here... So I know the extent of the rules fairly well, and I can say without a doubt that the thread was in violation of 0 rules and was locked on personal feelings in the subject.
Look Cid, don’t bring the “locked cuz of feelings” u r not in any position to do so.
What was that?
I don’t even know where you’re going with that remark. But it’s true. The thread was not lock for any violation of the rules. You’re the only person who seems to think it was right now too.
yes u do Cid, I can bet I’m not the only member here that knows u’ve banned and locked by “feelings” as u call it and no I’m not the only that feels like that
Green_Ninja wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
hey hey
If I recall I said:
“I don’t want u to punish or do nothing of the sort”
No, I said talk to them
stop twisting my words, ok?
You want me to go and individually lecture everyone in the topic.
Why would I do that?
They didn’t do anything wrong.
If you hate it so much, why can’t you lecture them?
You don’t need mod powers to send a PM.
of course not, but would they listen?, they listen to the M-O-D-S
@ both of u
u just don’t want to face the truth cuz u know u’d end up looking like the bad guys, the party poopers.
u know as well as I do those were racist comments
and if I recall racism is prohibited
and I bet no one else here will say anything cuz they are afraid u will ban them like u Cid have done so before
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
I don’t find any reason the thread should have been locked, to be honest. You can look at it as if it was a joke (one which really doesn’t make sense at the best of times O.o) or you can say it’s discriminating against third-world children.
The only thing was, it wasn’t really. It wasn’t saying “third-world children deserve to starve” (As I know of, nobody said that anyways) or things like that.
Yeah, honestly, I didn’t like it either, but there are a lot of things on here I don’t like. Maybe that thread was sort of bordering on the break of rules, but as far as I could tell it never did break any.
Now, I haven’t actually looked at the ENTIRE thing, but from what I’ve seen a single rule was never broken.
zeta_evolved wrote:
yes u do Cid, I can bet I’m not the only member here that knows u’ve banned and locked by “feelings” as u call it and no I’m not the only that feels like that
and I bet no one else here will say anything cuz they are afraid u will ban them like u Cid have done so before
No, I’ve gotten pissed and banned people before. I’ll admit it. But go back, every time, every damn time, they warranted a ban. Most of the time I banned for excessive flaming and spamming when I was pissed. But I never, not one single time, abused my powers. Had I, I would have been stripped of them.
zeta_evolved wrote:
@ both of u
u just don’t want to face the truth cuz u know u’d end up looking like the bad guys, the party poopers.
u know as well as I do those were racist comments
and if I recall racism is prohibited
And those comments were not racist. Please, tell me how it was racist? He used “third world children” oohh he’s racist. If he would have said “rich american children” you wouldn’t be as pissed as you are, because you believe that third world children deserve more respect or something.
The modding decision was poor, Treeplanter, Green_Ninja, Tyreaus, and I all agree on that.
zeta_evolved wrote:
eh...
ur opinion I respect it
but I stand straight to everything I’ve said
I respect your opinion as well.. But that doesn’t mean it’s right.
I was once a moderator here... So I know the extent of the rules fairly well, and I can say without a doubt that the thread was in violation of 0 rules and was locked on personal feelings in the subject.
Look Cid, don’t bring the “locked cuz of feelings” u r not in any position to do so.
What was that?
I don’t even know where you’re going with that remark. But it’s true. The thread was not lock for any violation of the rules. You’re the only person who seems to think it was right now too.
yes u do Cid, I can bet I’m not the only member here that knows u’ve banned and locked by “feelings” as u call it and no I’m not the only that feels like that
Green_Ninja wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
hey hey
If I recall I said:
“I don’t want u to punish or do nothing of the sort”
No, I said talk to them
stop twisting my words, ok?
You want me to go and individually lecture everyone in the topic.
Why would I do that?
They didn’t do anything wrong.
If you hate it so much, why can’t you lecture them?
You don’t need mod powers to send a PM.
of course not, but would they listen?, they listen to the M-O-D-S
@ both of u
u just don’t want to face the truth cuz u know u’d end up looking like the bad guys, the party poopers.
u know as well as I do those were racist comments
and if I recall racism is prohibited
and I bet no one else here will say anything cuz they are afraid u will ban them like u Cid have done so before
I’m not going to ban people for hating me or going against me.
And it wasn’t racist.
And no, members don’t listen to mods.
And it wouldn’t matter, they’d just laugh..
“Please pay respect to third world children and don’t eat them."
the term third world children is not racist it slef because it has a very different meaning of wat u ppl think it is
it’s the way it was used, like Ty said to discriminate these poor children and I saw it and knew that was the meaning of the comments, Squipple didn’t do it, I know he was doing it for plain fun, fine many other could have done so too, but still some comments really escalated,
go look and read this
“after u have sex with them”
wow that’s so acceptable
and of course you all agree, let me tell u y
u want to end up looking good in the eyes of each other that’s y I can bet you all are agreeing without giving it logical thought just for the reason of u guys being close friends
THAT’S IT
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
zeta_evolved wrote:
the term third world children is not racist it slef because it has a very different meaning of wat u ppl think it is
it’s the way it was used, like Ty said to discriminate these poor children and I saw it and knew that was the meaning of the comments, Squipple didn’t do it, I know he was doing it for plain fun, fine many other could have done so too, but still some comments really escalated,
go look and read this
“after u have sex with them”
wow that’s so acceptable
and of course you all agree, let me tell u y
u want to end up looking good in the eyes of each other that’s y I can bet you all are agreeing without giving it logical thought just for the reason of u guys being close friends
THAT’S IT
None of it breaks rules though. As bad as it may be, there wasn’t a single breach of the rules through whatever loophole you want to try and shove it through.
zeta_evolved wrote:
watever, too pointless to argue with u ppl
matter of fact is
u all agree cuz u want to look “good” in each other eyes
that’s it
and I’m not giving up, I swear, another thread like that I won’t keep my mouth shut.
cuz honestly I think all of u do a lousy job, no offense, my apologies if someone is offended...
and like I said this was a lost battle since the start u can’t fight someone that agrees without no logical background
Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s shit and a half what other people think of me, I don’t care if I look “good” in someone else’s eyes or bad.
Just look at that first part of that sentence right there and tell me if someone who’d want to be a “good little two-shoes” person would say something like that.
I based it off my own look of the thread, I checked everything over and, as I said, as much as I didn’t like it I didn’t find a single rule broken.
Now you want to call that “looking good in someone else’s eyes” go right on ahead and be like that, but frankly I know exactly where my motives lie.
zeta_evolved wrote:
I’m gonna stop, right here cuz I know if I move on this will end up in a fight
and I’m not talking about “someone” u know exactly who I’m talking about
now everyone says they don’t give a crap about how others think of 'em
trust me we all do we don’t like to admit it but we all do
There were no rules broken.
Hell, I even tried to find loopholes to shove it through to see if anything could be found, I got nowhere. (I may not have tried really hard but I Was busy with other stuff too)
I don’t care about looking good. If I really wanted to look good, I would act happy all the time and try and help everyone instead of being like I am.
For that example anyways.
I’m not trying to look good in anyone’s eyes.
Plus, if you were to think about it, the same could be said for the opposite opinion.
So this whole “we just want to look good” is a load of B.S. frankly, because if you really wanted the same card could be played on the other end of the table.
»
On-Topic
» Lock thread happy? - A discussion on poor taste
