| 11 Jan 2008 10:32 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15  Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | RageOverdose wrote:
No, its children in countries which are economically distraught. It just so happens many third world countries are African or Asian. But I don’t see it as third world children being African or Asian, but being children in poverty stricken countries.
“just so happens”
it just so happens ? well .. it HAS happened aight. and the fact STAYS.
RageOverdose wrote:
You sir, are a racist. In fact, anyone, no matter what they believe, is a racist when they mention race as a reasoning.
You are rather too prejudiced to argue on that. Human’s are racists. Would you be true to your soul that no 'white man' ever differentiates between a another 'white man' and one of african origin.
Racism is ingrained into us, but racial discrimination, persecution and segregation are evils we 'can' and must try to do away with.
For instance, in India (the streets), white/black/chinese.. EVERYONE is mocked at and made fun of, due to their race.
But few do it on their faces
Racism is rampant, but its civility that gives men the choice to NOT do it.
When a dark skinned friend of mine went to Austria (yes wolfie land of your fathers and also of Herr Hitler) he was STARED at for ETERNITY.
When the Austrian guy came to India, it was the same.
There i hope I’ve made my point.
George Bush to Mandela to Mother Teresa to the KKK.. WE ALL ARE RACIALLY PREJUDICED , but some of us choose to remain HUMAN, some don’t. period
RageOverdose wrote:
And I can agree with the rational logic here, it was in bad taste, but shouldn’t be locked because no intent in it was malicious. It was only a joke. And taking a joke too seriously causes problems. Malicious intent should be attacked, not jokes.
The Jews aren’t a RACE. Joking about paedophilia isn’t 'malicious' and definitely not worse than 'eating' children.
Swear to your soul and tell me a thread How would you fuck molest Jewish children would arouse the same 'lulz' as the one we speak of?
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos...Last edited 11 Jan 2008 10:33 am by THE_PAIN | |
 |
| 11 Jan 2008 10:36 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | Tyreaus wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
how is not discriminating children!!!
it’s implying TO HAVE SEX WITH A CHILD!!!!
It doesn’t break the rules though...I checked...
now that my boy is a motherfucking JOKE !
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 11 Jan 2008 10:39 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | Green_Ninja wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
how is not discriminating children!!!
it’s implying TO HAVE SEX WITH A CHILD!!!!
Implying to have sex with a child, by a child.
Besides, in some third world countries, as soon as they hit puberty, they’re supposed to start having sex and children.
And in most first world countries children start doing it on their OWN , even when they know they AIN’t sposed to do it.
So is it that first world children are as evil as THIRD world parents ?
Thats a crock of shite... tell me teenage/premature sex and pregnancy isn’t a problem in the first world and i’d put my fist to the open mouth that says it for a handshake.
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 11 Jan 2008 10:48 am |
Ty NLI Guest | THE_PAIN wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
how is not discriminating children!!!
it’s implying TO HAVE SEX WITH A CHILD!!!!
It doesn’t break the rules though...I checked...
now that my boy is a motherfucking JOKE !
Would you like me to magically make up a new rule forbidding such topics with my lovely moderating powers that allow me to do any dandy thing I so wish?
Yes, it’s disgusting and disturbing, but on paper held no premises for being locked.
| |
| 11 Jan 2008 10:49 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | Ty NLI wrote:
THE_PAIN wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
how is not discriminating children!!!
it’s implying TO HAVE SEX WITH A CHILD!!!!
It doesn’t break the rules though...I checked...
now that my boy is a motherfucking JOKE !
Would you like me to magically make up a new rule forbidding such topics with my lovely moderating powers that allow me to do any dandy thing I so wish?
Yes, it’s disgusting and disturbing, but on paper held no premises for being locked.
yeah the joke’s on 'THE RULE MAKER'
not on you boytoy
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 11 Jan 2008 10:58 am |
Endriago Mercenario Rep: 38 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 8,254 | THE_PAIN wrote:
Ty NLI wrote:
THE_PAIN wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
how is not discriminating children!!!
it’s implying TO HAVE SEX WITH A CHILD!!!!
It doesn’t break the rules though...I checked...
now that my boy is a motherfucking JOKE !
Would you like me to magically make up a new rule forbidding such topics with my lovely moderating powers that allow me to do any dandy thing I so wish?
Yes, it’s disgusting and disturbing, but on paper held no premises for being locked.
yeah the joke’s on 'THE RULE MAKER'
not on you boytoy
Then should that not be discussed in the proper thread?
http://lounge.moviecodec.com/topics/16931p1.html
Now, as it is, there were no actual, written grounds for the topic to have been locked, so the problem of the entire thing lies in the rules, and Bjarne isn’t going to consider changing them if the debate continues here, as it won’t garner his attention much.
---
| |
| 11 Jan 2008 11:02 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | Well he tends to it or not, its a sad joke on the site’s attitude towards paedophilia. Thats all. I’m not here to “change” things matey, i know i CANT.
I’m just standing up for what i think is right.
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 11 Jan 2008 04:38 pm |
why so ser- shut the fuck up. Rep: 38 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 15,697 ONLINE | there’s no pedophilia involved in eating 3rd world children.
It wasn’t racist, since 3rd world does not mean a certain race.
It was just funny.
---
  | |
| 11 Jan 2008 04:58 pm |
Live like an angel, die like a devil Rep: 20 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 12,759 OFFLINE | Yeah!! I was the only one joking about pedophilia!!
What do you expect from fucker?
---
 | |
| 11 Jan 2008 05:03 pm |
is causing chaos. Rep: 26 Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,135 OFFLINE | THE_PAIN: BAWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!
| |
| 11 Jan 2008 06:25 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 26 Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 14,937 OFFLINE | THE_PAIN wrote:
kev360 wrote:
its not racist you dumbasses, its simply discussing eating children. now we have it for all cultures, so you can’t even call it racist. it shouldn’t have been locked in the first place. that is simply ridiculous.
“3rd world” is NOT all cultures ..
but 3rd world, second world, and first world are. there is a thread for each.
ANYWAYS, its not discriminating. its asking a simple question. the point WASN’T that they were third world children. the point was that they were asking how to EAT CHILDREN! that was the focus. the humor has interesting taiste, but thats it. it is no worse then dead baby jokes.
---
 | |
| 13 Jan 2008 03:50 am |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | kev360 wrote:
THE_PAIN wrote:
kev360 wrote:
its not racist you dumbasses, its simply discussing eating children. now we have it for all cultures, so you can’t even call it racist. it shouldn’t have been locked in the first place. that is simply ridiculous.
“3rd world” is NOT all cultures ..
but 3rd world, second world, and first world are. there is a thread for each.
ANYWAYS, its not discriminating. its asking a simple question. the point WASN’T that they were third world children. the point was that they were asking how to EAT CHILDREN! that was the focus. the humor has interesting taiste, but thats it. it is no worse then dead baby jokes.
tell me i wouldn get a similar laughter out of a thread named “how would you eat Jewish children” ?
any why is eating babies a LESSER evil than pedophilia ?
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 13 Jan 2008 03:51 am |
|
| 14 Jan 2008 08:43 pm |
why so ser- shut the fuck up. Rep: 38Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 15,697 ONLINE | THE_PAIN wrote:
kev360 wrote:
THE_PAIN wrote:
kev360 wrote:
its not racist you dumbasses, its simply discussing eating children. now we have it for all cultures, so you can’t even call it racist. it shouldn’t have been locked in the first place. that is simply ridiculous.
“3rd world” is NOT all cultures ..
but 3rd world, second world, and first world are. there is a thread for each.
ANYWAYS, its not discriminating. its asking a simple question. the point WASN’T that they were third world children. the point was that they were asking how to EAT CHILDREN! that was the focus. the humor has interesting taiste, but thats it. it is no worse then dead baby jokes.
tell me i wouldn get a similar laughter out of a thread named “how would you eat Jewish children” ?
any why is eating babies a LESSER evil than pedophilia ?
You would get laughter.
Because it’s funny. It doesn’t say “I HATE JEWS” nor does it even come close to implying that. Anyone with a sense of humor can appreciate it. Most people on this site are from first world countries and voted in the first world children poll.
Eating babies is considered lesser than pedophilia because no one really eats babies.
---
| |
| 15 Jan 2008 02:22 pm |
I created "The Pain Series". Now u die Rep: 15Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 7,720 OFFLINE | Atresac wrote:
You would get laughter.
.
NO YOU WONT. WWII GUILT IS SO STRONG, The jews get away with murder in palestine.
You make the thread and we’ll see.
Atresac wrote:
Because it’s funny. It doesn’t say “I HATE JEWS” nor does it even come close to implying that. Anyone with a sense of humor can appreciate it.
You cant make Jewish jokes unless you’re a Jew , FACE IT.
Atresac wrote:
Eating babies is considered lesser than pedophilia because no one really eats babies.
Thats not very logical, and most definitely not a rational explanation.
Nobody fucks anyone’s dead wife. Tell a joke about it to someone who’s just lost his wife.
---
“A few more “victories” and the U.S. will be bankrupt.“
Es ist hoffnungslos... | |
| 15 Jan 2008 02:28 pm |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 48 Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,754 OFFLINE | I’ve seen that Kev likes to generalize cultures by the world they belong to, really Kev u should do some research first and stop making those generalizations, if I got the memo wrong tell me I’ll appreciate it.
---
 
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
| 15 Jan 2008 04:54 pm |
why so ser- shut the fuck up. Rep: 38Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 15,697 ONLINE | zeta_evolved wrote:
I’ve seen that Kev likes to generalize cultures by the world they belong to, really Kev u should do some research first and stop making those generalizations, if I got the memo wrong tell me I’ll appreciate it.
actually you’re the one who seems to think that all children in 3rd world countries are suffering for us. Third world means under-developed countries. That’s it. There’s no definition further than that. Any country can be considered underdeveloped.
The Pain- will do.
---
| |
| 15 Jan 2008 05:15 pm |
Coco Chanel - My Queen Rep: 48Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 9,754 OFFLINE | Atresac wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
I’ve seen that Kev likes to generalize cultures by the world they belong to, really Kev u should do some research first and stop making those generalizations, if I got the memo wrong tell me I’ll appreciate it.
actually you’re the one who seems to think that all children in 3rd world countries are suffering for us. Third world means under-developed countries. That’s it. There’s no definition further than that. Any country can be considered underdeveloped.
The Pain- will do.
Wrong:
The third world is the one that was isolated during the cold war, meaning those countries that didn’t interfere with it, those who weren’t dominated by capitalist and communist goverments...
Your definition would apply to China: “China is third world cuz it’s under development”, wrong:
China is second world why? cuz it’s a communist country and was communist during the cold war:
Russia now it’s a developed country but due to it being communist during the cold war, it’s consider second world...
Cuba, a under-developed country is second world why? well let’s say Castro...
Now you say, “Brazil, it’s a capitalist country it’s first world," wrong, even tho it’s now a developed country, during the cold war it remained isolated from the cold war that named it a third world country...
The first world uses the term third world wrong, it has never been officially giving the “under-development country” definition by any country, when it does I’ll know I’m wrong.
---
Anonymousface. wrote:
To Mr. samus suks my balls:
Learn to spell. And she can’t suck anything that isn’t there.
| |
| 15 Jan 2008 06:03 pm |
why so ser- shut the fuck up. Rep: 38Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 15,697 ONLINE | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_world#Definition
In academic circles, the countries of the Third World are known as the “Global South”, the “developing countries”, and the “under-developed countries”.
By the way, so are you admitting defeat on the “racist behaviors” argument you had earlier in the thread since you have since learned that third world does not denote a specific race?
---
| |
| 15 Jan 2008 06:08 pm |
Tree at school Guest | ^^^^^^^^
humph, I was just about to do that
| |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
»
On-Topic
» Lock thread happy? - A discussion on poor taste
