Also, the hacking was ripped off an old cell phone game. (Can’t remember what it’s called, but will when I get to see what it is when parents get back).
SILVERXXX wrote:
Seriously.....after you have experienced a Wii FPS, the two analog games seem less exciting despite the looks of the game....
They really do. They just don’t feel as solid and fluent. Wii FPS is just better. Not to mention more intense. Trust me going back to play H3 with a few friends, I can tell how much better Wii FPS is.
Yet they still don’t score quite as high on the ranks.
SILVERXXX wrote:
Seriously.....after you have experienced a Wii FPS, the two analog games seem less exciting despite the looks of the game....
They really do. They just don’t feel as solid and fluent. Wii FPS is just better. Not to mention more intense. Trust me going back to play H3 with a few friends, I can tell how much better Wii FPS is.
Yet they still don’t score quite as high on the ranks.
Reviewers are hardcore gamers and techie whores. They hate change. That’s why its so hard for anything new to get rated highly unless it’s a game that’s exactly like previous games before it, ala most people’s GOTY, Bioshock.
Control wise, Wii FPS dominates anything dual analog. It’s quicker, more precise, and more involved. It also has a knack of seperating the good and the bad, as it’s not something everyone can do extremely well. If you are a really good shot, it’ll show up. If you aren’t then your weakness will be shown. Because it’s a more realistic play style it’ll have more realistic after effects. Fact of the matter is FPS on Wii is better control wise, more intense, and provides a more real feeling to it. It’s hard going back to dual analog, especially after MOHH2.
Demon Slayer wrote:
aiming is bttr on wii...sometimes.
i beg to differ... most of the time
yea that’s what i meant. When i was typing on the PS3 though....well when u first type a letter it estimates a word and sometimes it picks it. So it kinda messed me up. Then i got off PS3 and now i’m on PC . I was gonna say “seriosuly” becuase i knew Xtrm would find it funny (me saying Wii aiming was good).
SILVERXXX wrote:
Seriously.....after you have experienced a Wii FPS, the two analog games seem less exciting despite the looks of the game....
They really do. They just don’t feel as solid and fluent. Wii FPS is just better. Not to mention more intense. Trust me going back to play H3 with a few friends, I can tell how much better Wii FPS is.
Yet they still don’t score quite as high on the ranks.
Reviewers are hardcore gamers and techie whores. They hate change. That’s why its so hard for anything new to get rated highly unless it’s a game that’s exactly like previous games before it, ala most people’s GOTY, Bioshock.
Control wise, Wii FPS dominates anything dual analog. It’s quicker, more precise, and more involved. It also has a knack of seperating the good and the bad, as it’s not something everyone can do extremely well. If you are a really good shot, it’ll show up. If you aren’t then your weakness will be shown. Because it’s a more realistic play style it’ll have more realistic after effects. Fact of the matter is FPS on Wii is better control wise, more intense, and provides a more real feeling to it. It’s hard going back to dual analog, especially after MOHH2.
Well it looks like I dont need to make my post anymore, well said Zucas
the high reviews for halo 3 were kinda pressured out of the reviewers cus it was so incredibly hyped (biggest launch in entertainment history) but yeah the game wasn’t breath taking, everything in the game has been done before and better.
i didn’t think there was much hype for bioshock tho, i thought it was very impressive. but call of duty 4 definatlly deserves it, good work!
»
Games
» IGN Game of the Year For Xbox 360 Goes To Call Of Duty 4
. I was gonna say “seriosuly” becuase i knew Xtrm would find it funny (me saying Wii aiming was good).
