ramunematt wrote:
Okay, I think a thread has to be made in the feedback section that clearly states what are considered “ridiculous allegations”, because that is mostly an opinionated statement. In the eye of one religion, another religion’s beliefs could be seen as a ridiculous allegation because they don’t share the same beliefs.
There seems to be no elaboration on what a ridiculous allegation really is or what it applies to. So I think one has to be set.
"All Christians are just bible bangers” (example)
Something stereotyping a religion perhaps, or even saying a religion is bullshit. (it’s not a ridiculous allegation but it still counts with the rule)
Tyreaus wrote:
“All Christians are just bible bangers” (example)
Something stereotyping a religion perhaps, or even saying a religion is bullshit. (it’s not a ridiculous allegation but it still counts with the rule)
Tyreaus wrote:
“All Christians are just bible bangers” (example)
Something stereotyping a religion perhaps, or even saying a religion is bullshit. (it’s not a ridiculous allegation but it still counts with the rule)
A ridiculous allegation would be something like blaming Christianity/Islam/Judaism/Buddhism/etc. for the death of millions of people, merely because the religion is what it is. Or, saying atheists are heartless bastards since they have no religion.
Its basically an accusation that’s demeaning or full of bigotry to any one group/institution/etc. Saying that religion is bullshit really isn’t a ridiculous allegation, its just a rude claim.
firewolf81 wrote:
I think a good definition would be a allegation that has no real facts or theory to substantiate the claim.
Meaning religious theories in general haha.
Once again this goes back to what Matt was talking about perspective wise. The thought of “ridiculous allegations” is just too, what’s a good word, ambiguous, ect. Does not fit well.
First ]
»
Feedback
» Ridiculous Allegation Elaboration
