Stix86 wrote:
the countries mentioned were infact comunist nations not just “the name given to thier brutal dictatorships”. they were infact communist.
the sausage party is getting old. and the reason you feel the need to repeat yourself is cause you contradidcted yourself. all i said was the previously mentioned contries were comunist. and you still never admited that you were wrong about the intellect thing.
gunslang. this is an actual question, i’m not being sarcastic. could the communist system be used in any form of government? i would think that the way inwitch the government was chosen wouldn’t nessacerily cause a change in the system. so couldn’t communism be held in a dictatorship as well as a democracy?
Stix86 wrote:
and the reason you feel the need to repeat yourself is cause you contradidcted yourself. all i said was the previously mentioned contries we’re comunist.
I didn’t contradict myself anywhere, newfag.
and you still never admited that you were wrong about the intellect thing.
Firstly, fine. Intellect works. Intellectual is a far less sloppy word to use, and more grammatically accurate for what you were trying to get across.
Secondly, how can you possibly be such a pretentious little faggot when your spelling and sentence structure is appalling.
Stix86 wrote:
and the reason you feel the need to repeat yourself is cause you contradidcted yourself. all i said was the previously mentioned contries we’re comunist.
I didn’t contradict myself anywhere, newfag.
and you still never admited that you were wrong about the intellect thing.
Firstly, fine. Intellect works. Intellectual is a far less sloppy word to use, and more grammatically accurate for what you were trying to get across.
Secondly, how can you possibly be such a pretentious little faggot when your spelling and sentence structure is appalling.
Grow up.
it’s called communication. propper spelling is not necsarry on a silly discussion boared. if you want 2 waist ur tyme yousing spel check on this go ahead. i’m not trying to fool anyone here. if you feel the need to act like you’ve memorized every word in the english language go ahead. i only do that on contracts and reports. it’s also funny that the childish one of us who’s been spending all of his time trying to find ways to insult me and others is telling me to grow up. the word you’re looking for is stubborn.
the whole reason i got involved in this dicussion in the first place is cause you immiturely tried to belittle some one who made a statement or asked a question on the first page. that’s right youre imaturity is the cause of this long 24 hr trash fest.
and i already put you’re quote up once. i’m not gunna do it again. i am surprised you admitted you were wrong about the intellect thing though. i thought you were just gunna ignore it again. even though you tried to justify your mistake with more bs.
pretentiouse? you just used the word appaling...i’ve been honest, and real. i haven’t done anything to pretend to be more knowledgeable, or superior to any one in any way. but you call me pretentiose?
Most of that first paragraph was unreadable. I fail to believe that those spelling mistakes are anything other than mistakes, made by someone who obviously didn’t take in a word of his secondary education.
I came into the topic belittling you because you made an absurd statement. The fact that you couldn’t take the flaming is why this arguement has gone on for so long. You retorts of 'little drummer boy' display a deep rooted inferiority complex, and your persistance displays overwhelming arrogance. You simply couldn’t take having your opinions degraded.
Your continued posts are a testament to my success as a troll.
Pretentious is the right word, thanks. I’m not trying desperately to justify punching above my own weight.
you haven’t been able to belittle me. i’ve schooled you this entire time. you made some statement about people making comments about things they don’t understand. unfortunately he left and wasn’t able to defend himself. i’m sure he would have schooled you to. what you did to me was use a childish insult.
you’re sucsess as a troll? trolls must aspire to fail.
i never said you were trying to justify punching above you’re own weight. it’s just obvious that you are.
DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
No, fag. Punching above your own weight was aimed at you. Congratulations for misreading the post.
I obviously have been very successful since you won’t let it drop.
I’m teh winnar. Win troll is win.
i know what you ment. i was just being substaintialy wittier than you.
what the fuck do you mean by troll anyway. is it another attempt to be different? since you not a psyc major obviously, little drummer boy was me being condecending.
i’ve already repeated this once. saying you’re right and being right are two different things little drummer boy.
No, you’re right. I’m an engineering major, with college-level Modern History under my belt. I studied Marxism and it’s interpretations for two years.
So who’s going to be right about communism, oh pretentious one?
Oh, and trolling is deliberately pissing people off on the internet to illicit a response. I think you’ll find I’ve been exceptionally successful thus far.
Stix86 wrote:
the sausage party is getting old. and the reason you feel the need to repeat yourself is cause you contradidcted yourself. all i said was the previously mentioned contries were comunist. and you still never admited that you were wrong about the intellect thing.
gunslang. this is an actual question, i’m not being sarcastic. could the communist system be used in any form of government? i would think that the way inwitch the government was chosen wouldn’t nessacerily cause a change in the system. so couldn’t communism be held in a dictatorship as well as a democracy?
yes I suppose so, infact a democratic communist system might actually be closer to marxist communism than the usual fascist derivative we see.
--- I’m a Victorian metalhead, pleased to meat you.
you studied communism and modern hystery and still got schooled! you’re even less intelligent then i thought. you probably should have kept that quiet.
you told me to grow up and you troll the internet. that’s funny.
and oddly enough, you even failed at your “trolling”. i was amused by your posts. i live in the real world, and enjoyed the schooling i gave you. i do this to people in person most of the time and it’s slightly more enjoyable. i just never realized there was some lame term for it.
Stix86 wrote:
you studied communism and modern hystery and still got schooled!
Umm, how so? Gunslang and The Pain have both stated the same position as myself and pretty much every historian ever. You’re the one who is wrong. Grow the fuck up and admit it.
Stix86 wrote:
the sausage party is getting old. and the reason you feel the need to repeat yourself is cause you contradidcted yourself. all i said was the previously mentioned contries were comunist. and you still never admited that you were wrong about the intellect thing.
gunslang. this is an actual question, i’m not being sarcastic. could the communist system be used in any form of government? i would think that the way inwitch the government was chosen wouldn’t nessacerily cause a change in the system. so couldn’t communism be held in a dictatorship as well as a democracy?
yes I suppose so, infact a democratic communist system might actually be closer to marxist communism than the usual fascist derivative we see.
the “cult of personality” sounds much closer to a legislative branch of government. the executive branch is probably the least neccisary. i think the rebelion that leads to the society leaves it open for power hungry leaders. it makes sense since most world and corprate leaders show sociopathic trates.
»
Politics
» Communism
