Ryu Vs. Liu Kang

Wannabe
Rep: 2

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 84
OFFLINE

It seems to me that you don’t care about the debate at all. You care about trying make Ryu win and that’s it. This has nothing to do with making rules. It’s about making a much better and more fair discussion.


look whos talking. youre the one whos preventing me from using the ryu version i want, restricting the versions i can use and youre not even the creator, and youre talking about fair? wow!

it has nothing to do with making rule eh? then STOP WHINING AND GET DOWN TO BUSINESS. prove liu can win. STOP WHINING LIKE A GIRL ABOUT THE VERSION OF RYU I CAN USE!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 7

Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
OFFLINE

Evil Ryu IS canon and rather it is or not is not the point. The thing is, he’s from the series.



I didn’t say anything about him being right. MvC Ryu is a mismatch and everybody knows that so obviously, he wasn’t talking that version.



I’ve been through this already.



Non canon or canon has nothing to do with it. I’m talking about from their SERIES, that’s it. Also, he’s never got stabbed in the chest nor did he beat Raiden.



Except I’m not even using these feats. I’m not using fatalities, mutalities, brutalities, animalities...



That doesn’t mean it can get messy.

Last edited 28 Jan 2008 03:03 pm by Go2movies

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 7

Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
OFFLINE

You’re using an overpowered version from another series just to make Ryu win, yes that’s unfair.



Nobody’s whining but you. Instead of trying to use the character everybody obviously means, you’re using an overpowered version just to MAKE him win and when someone tells you about this, you go crazy.

Wannabe
Rep: 2

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 84
OFFLINE

Since then, Evil Ryu has occasionally appeared in various Capcom games featuring Ryu. Nevertheless, Evil Ryu does not exist as a separate character and is only an alternate, “what if” version of Ryu. so yeah. evil ryu is not canon. and is it my fault if ryu has a lot of appearances in games that his company actually made?

yeah its a mismatch. thats why ryu will kill liu

and youre reasons regarding it is not acceptable. because youre preventing me from using a version i want to use

In Mortal Kombat: Armageddon, he accomplishes his first task by saving his friends but was unable to reunite his body and soul. However, in his ending, players learn that upon defeating Blaze, Liu Kang’s body and soul reunite, and he gains the power of a god. Liu Kang then confronted the corrupted Raiden, and reluctantly defeated him in an epic clash. With the consent of the Elder Gods, he replaced Raiden as Protector of Earthrealm.

and its obvious you never really played a lot of MK. since a lot of MK games features a weapon. and that weapon can be thrust in your opponent.

my point being i dont act like i created this thread and preventing other debaters to use any versions they want. unlike you who keeps on making rules.

Wannabe
Rep: 2

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 84
OFFLINE

uhmmm the series is made by the same company that created ryu. so, i can use it. but i cant use the crappy american version of street fighter tv series. because im not sure if its made by capcom, or the american company capcom at least. and no, thats not unfair. whats unfair is restricting other debaters to use a chracter they want as if you made the thread

im whining? tell me whos the one that keeps saying i cant use the version i want because its too powerful? and its obvious? so let me ask you again, can you read the creators mind? you know whats the version of ryu he wants to be use here?

and youre preventing me to use him just to make liu win. man, what they say in the goku vs superman thread is true. you are a stubborn fanboy

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 7

Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
OFFLINE

Evil Ryu actually appeared in the actual storyline (although briefly) so he IS canon. And the thing is you’re using an appearance where he had to be overpowered just to compete with a certain group of characters.



And you call ME a stubborn fanboy? Pathetic.



The only reason you wanna use this version is just so he can win and that’s unfair.



That was only in the ending. We still don’t know if that was canon or not.



And it’s obvious you never pay attention to what actually happened in the storyline. In MK4 characters can get their neck broken during the fight. But in the actual storyline, Liu Kang died when got his broken.



That’s because you have an overpowered version of the character you’re supporting so you’re just gonna use that just to make him win. That’s the problem. And once again, that’s not making rules.

Last edited 26 Jan 2008 12:37 am by Go2movies

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 7

Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 2,673
OFFLINE

So what if it’s made by the same company that made Ryu? That doesn’t mean everything is the same. And yes, it is unfair. You’re using an overpowered version of Ryu just to make sure he wins, even though it’s obvious the original poster wasn’t using that.



It’s not about reading peoples mind. It’s using common sense. You don’t see people talk about the MvsC version of Ryu in a versus debate and the fact that you’re using that just to make Ryu win is unfair.



Okay, tough guy. Tell me where did I use an overpowered version of Liu Kang just so he can win? Tell me where did I use a version of Ryu that’s obviously MUCH weaker than Liu Kang?

Maybe next time you’d learn to think before spouting nonsense like that.

Last edited 26 Jan 2008 12:14 am by Go2movies

Regular
Rep: 8



Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 721
OFFLINE

Supposedly Ryu became Evil Ryu for a split second when he defeated Sagat in the first Street Fighter tournament. So Evil Ryu is part of the canon storyline.

Last edited 26 Jan 2008 12:32 am by EB V3