| 23 Jan 2008 02:09 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 48  Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,545 OFFLINE | Skull_Kid wrote:
if evolution was real, id have been a rock in a past life... aint happenin... never did either...
This is easily one of the stupidest misconceptions about evolution that I have ever heard.
Anyway, one of the misconceptions is that evolution says we evolved from monkeys. No evolutionists says we evolved from monkeys. They say we shared a common ancestor.
--- Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | |
 |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:16 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 52  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,929 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Skull_Kid wrote:
if evolution was real, id have been a rock in a past life... aint happenin... never did either...
This is easily one of the stupidest misconceptions about evolution that I have ever heard.
Anyway, one of the misconceptions is that evolution says we evolved from monkeys. No evolutionists says we evolved from monkeys. They say we shared a common ancestor.
They just love creating strawman arguments, its the only way they can make themself feel superior.
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:19 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18  Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 1,679 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Skull_Kid wrote:
if evolution was real, id have been a rock in a past life... aint happenin... never did either...
This is easily one of the stupidest misconceptions about evolution that I have ever heard.
Anyway, one of the misconceptions is that evolution says we evolved from monkeys. No evolutionists says we evolved from monkeys. They say we shared a common ancestor.
What’s the difference? That common ancestor is implied to be a ape.
---
 | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:26 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 52  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,929 OFFLINE | Cid Highwind wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Skull_Kid wrote:
if evolution was real, id have been a rock in a past life... aint happenin... never did either...
This is easily one of the stupidest misconceptions about evolution that I have ever heard.
Anyway, one of the misconceptions is that evolution says we evolved from monkeys. No evolutionists says we evolved from monkeys. They say we shared a common ancestor.
What’s the difference? That common ancestor is implied to be a ape.
If you look at our ancestors they look more like us then todays apes.

--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:36 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18  Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 1,679 OFFLINE | Here’s your evolutionary chart.

---
 | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:46 pm |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 40  Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 20,294 ONLINE | Gplex wrote:
Demon Slayer wrote:
[youtube]C1GhYGEoRfo[youtube]
spam much?
not rlly...
---
  | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:47 pm |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 40  Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 20,294 ONLINE | Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.


---
  | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:55 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 52  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,929 OFFLINE | Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.

lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:56 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18  Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 1,679 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.

lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
That’s not a “monkey” that’s a chimpanzee, mankind’s closest living relative.
---
 | |
| 23 Jan 2008 02:57 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 52  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,929 OFFLINE | Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.
[img]http://evolutionspace.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/lay_evo_obesity.jpg[img]
lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
That’s not a “monkey” that’s a chimpanzee, mankind’s closest living relative.
They didnt exist back then.
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 23 Jan 2008 03:03 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18  Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 1,679 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.
[img]http://evolutionspace.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/lay_evo_obesity.jpg[img]
lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
That’s not a “monkey” that’s a chimpanzee, mankind’s closest living relative.
They didnt exist back then.
You can’t say that with any certainty.
Many human fossils have been found, but chimpanzee fossils were not described until 2005.
Chimpanzees existed way before 2005. They could have existed before man.
---
 | |
| 23 Jan 2008 03:04 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 52  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,929 OFFLINE | Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.
[img]http://evolutionspace.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/lay_evo_obesity.jpg[img]
lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
That’s not a “monkey” that’s a chimpanzee, mankind’s closest living relative.
They didnt exist back then.
You can’t say that with any certainty.
Many human fossils have been found, but chimpanzee fossils were not described until 2005.
Chimpanzees existed way before 2005. They could have existed before man.
Its unlikly but possible, but they would have spread out more if they had.
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 23 Jan 2008 03:05 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18  Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 1,679 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Cid Highwind wrote:
Here’s your evolutionary chart.
[img]http://evolutionspace.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/lay_evo_obesity.jpg[img]
lol well except for that monkey at the start this seems pretty accurate if you look at most americans..
That’s not a “monkey” that’s a chimpanzee, mankind’s closest living relative.
They didnt exist back then.
You can’t say that with any certainty.
Many human fossils have been found, but chimpanzee fossils were not described until 2005.
Chimpanzees existed way before 2005. They could have existed before man.
Its unlikly but possible, but they would have spread out more if they had.
Not necessarily.
But whatever. I’m through with this. I don’t even really believe in Creation or Evolution. So I don’t know why the hell I’m arguing.
---
 | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply |