| 01 Aug 2008 03:56 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 55  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,978 OFFLINE | Buster Sword wrote:
No you are arguing “whether it matters or not to whoever said it”, I am stating over and over that it wont change the facts.
You didnt say that, I said it, and you decided to make a strawman and later take me out of context.
Yes but you also said “it doesn’t matter because it doesn’t change facts."
I know I didn’t but you brought it up which had nothing to do with my first post, saying that I pulled a strawman was bullshit when I said nothing about anything changing facts, talk about hypocrasy.
Well at lease you admit the straw man, and I would only be a hypocrite in the part when I took you out of context but that was to prove a point.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | | 02 Aug 2008 03:59 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 31 Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 3,072 ONLINE | plex wrote:
Well at lease you admit the straw man, and I would only be a hypocrite in the part when I took you out of context but that was to prove a point.
I didn’t admit anything, actually. And how could you have took me out of context to prove a point before you complained I took you out of context? You did it with your second reply with something like “opinions don’t changes facts wtf."
Possibly the quote of the week.
seed wrote:
WOW,locking the original topic?buster sword afraid of me that’s why he request to locked that.
 | | | 04 Aug 2008 03:41 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,978 OFFLINE | Buster Sword wrote:
plex wrote:
Well at lease you admit the straw man, and I would only be a hypocrite in the part when I took you out of context but that was to prove a point.
I didn\'t admit anything, actually. And how could you have took me out of context to prove a point before you complained I took you out of context? You did it with your second reply with something like \“opinions don\'t changes facts wtf.\“
Buster Sword wrote:
Yes but you also said “it doesn’t matter because it doesn’t change facts.\“
yes = admit?
Are you trying to dispute that opinions dont change facts? I dont understand.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 04 Aug 2008 05:38 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 31Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 3,072 ONLINE | yes = admit?
Are you trying to dispute that opinions dont change facts? I dont understand.
No, you said in your previous post that you said “opinions don’t change facts”, then I said “yes” BUT you actually or also said “they don’t matter because they don’t change facts." If you though that’s what I meant then my bad for not be clear, but I do remember also saying in that same post something along the lines of “that strawman you said was bullshit."
And no, all I’m arguing is that even if an opinion is flawed and is totally bollocks, it would still matter to whoever who thought of it, was never putting it’s validity against facts, just saying it isn’t meaningless, well at least not to them.
But it doesn’t matter, nice debating with you, can call it quits if you want.
Possibly the quote of the week.
seed wrote:
WOW,locking the original topic?buster sword afraid of me that’s why he request to locked that.
Last edited 04 Aug 2008 10:29 am by Buster Sword | | | 04 Aug 2008 04:21 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,978 OFFLINE | Buster Sword wrote:
yes = admit?
Are you trying to dispute that opinions dont change facts? I dont understand.
No, you said in your previous post that you said \“opinions don\'t change facts\", then I said \“yes\" BUT you actually or also said \“they don\'t matter because they don\'t change facts.\" If you though that\'s what I meant then my bad for not be clear, but I do remember also saying in that same post something along the lines of \“that strawman you said was bullshit.\"
And no, all I\'m arguing is that even if an opinion is flawed and is totally bollocks, it would still matter to whoever who thought of it, was never putting it\'s validity against facts, just saying it isn\'t meaningless, well at least not to them.
But it doesn\'t matter, nice debating with you, can call it quits if you want.
of course not to them, but for someone to come up to me and say, Im not real.. I know they are full of shit and it doesnt matter... thats all Im getting at.. What people think does matter, but opinions shouldnt be valued as much as facts.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 05 Aug 2008 08:43 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 31Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 3,072 ONLINE | Gplex wrote:
of course not to them, but for someone to come up to me and say, Im not real.. I know they are full of shit and it doesnt matter... thats all Im getting at.. What people think does matter, but opinions shouldnt be valued as much as facts.
That was the backbone of my entire arguement. Well maybe we are all just a dream lol, but you see my point and I see yours. Well it’s not even the value tbh, it’s just acccepting it as there imo.
Possibly the quote of the week.
seed wrote:
WOW,locking the original topic?buster sword afraid of me that’s why he request to locked that.
| | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply |
|
»
Religion
» Science vs Religion
