Now, a hammer, thats a winners right there. Small and light, but packs a punch. The heavy metal on the end of the axis allows for the energy to be transfered at the top, where it hits.
Not to mention the hooks on the back. Hit it with the head and you can cause tremendous brain damage, hit them with the hooks and you may just crack through the skull and kill them.
That’s right, the baseball bat generated about 25x more force than the hockey stick.
Reference = Sport Science on the National Geographic Channel...Watch it
Iunno man..
Ive seen my share of nasty confrintations with both.
I mean the bat has more mass but the hockey sticks got a blade. And if the sticks blade is medal.. its like a knife man.
Not necessarily. The blade would make a nasty cut through the skin but the blow won’t generate enough force to crack the skull. It has to do with the elasticity in the stick which allows for it to bend thus not delivering one single blow with full momentum like the bat. Here’s a better explanation...
---
Last edited 25 Jan 2008 10:21 am by Xtrm Liability
The baseball bat is more dense then the hockey stick so it would have a more powerful blow. But the hockey stick has elements like a blade..
The video focused all the attention on the strike. So yea the bats going to win.. (Easier to break a stick then a bat..). And they used a composite stick that is made to flex.. Hmm?
If you had a regular wooden hockey stick with a medal blade that would hands down kill you.
--- "It feels great when alot of losers are around.."
.R.E.A.L.l.T.Y. wrote:
Thats a composite stick.. Easton S11 thats like 75 flex.. weak stick man. Im talking a medal blade.
Still, a hockey stick needs to average about 19 ounces in weight. Even with a metal blade, the shaft will have elasticity. Either way, you can’t argue with 25x more force from the bat.
»
Off-Topic
» What delivers more damage to the head?
two of them. That be ill.
