| 01 Feb 2008 04:28 pm |
Beyond omnipotence and highest rank Rep: 43  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,338 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
Gplex = dumb
the judeo-christian god is the same DUH!!
catholics are VERY different from protestants. its almost become like two different religions.
Besides a few little practice differences, there really isnt any difference.
They read the same bible, they believe the same shit, except, protestants are a little more literal in their translation.
They are still diffrent.
The beliefs are but the god isn’t. Don’t ask me to explain why they make different claims, it’s based on how they interpret I assume
---
 | |
 |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:29 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 24  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 14,858 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Gplex wrote:
All mainstream Protestants generally trace their separation from the Roman Catholic Church to the 16th century. So what makes your god more true then a Roman Catholic God? - I need to find out what and why you believe. Make if so I dont have to adress 100% of every claim because that would take quite a bit of typing.
we don’t vote for a person who has so much power HIS word is more important then Gods. we don’t go against the bible by praying to false gods (saints). we don’t make idles to gods (saints). want me to go on?
So you dont go against the bible.
i don’t go against the new pact with God that was made through jesus. or, at least, i try not to. i’ll admit, i don’t know everything that there is to know.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:29 pm |
Live like an angel, die like a devil Rep: 20  Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 12,757 OFFLINE | kev360 wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
Gplex = dumb
the judeo-christian god is the same DUH!!
catholics are VERY different from protestants. its almost become like two different religions.
Besides a few little practice differences, there really isnt any difference.
They read the same bible, they believe the same shit, except, protestants are a little more literal in their translation.
nope. look up apocrypha.
Protestant believes jesus saved us and read bible
Catholic believes jesus saved us and reads bible.
Difference?
For the record, Catholiscism has not really prayed to statues or saints in a while. I was never told to, in any of the catholic churches Ive been to. Very minor practice differences.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:31 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 24  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 14,858 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Gplex wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
zeta_evolved wrote:
Gplex = dumb
the judeo-christian god is the same DUH!!
catholics are VERY different from protestants. its almost become like two different religions.
Besides a few little practice differences, there really isnt any difference.
They read the same bible, they believe the same shit, except, protestants are a little more literal in their translation.
They are still diffrent.
The beliefs are but the god isn’t. Don’t ask me to explain why they make different claims, it’s based on how they interpret I assume
the catholics took a part of the bible where jesus said that he would build the church on one of his deciples as meaning that the church needs a human leader, and thus the pope came about. from there, all the differences are from the pope. the pope’s word is treated like scripture, so obviously things get changed around a bit.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:32 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 24  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 14,858 OFFLINE | ugh, i’m gonna go take a shower. just trust me, catholics are very different from protestants.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:33 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 48  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,773 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
The beliefs are but the god isn’t. Don’t ask me to explain why they make different claims, it’s based on how they interpret I assume
But if one says my god is this and the other says my god is that, is that not a diffrent god?
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:33 pm |
Live like an angel, die like a devil Rep: 20  Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 12,757 OFFLINE | kev360 wrote:
ugh, i’m gonna go take a shower. just trust me, catholics are very different from protestants.
Ive been to both masses, and talked to both kinds, and no, not really.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:35 pm |
Beyond omnipotence and highest rank Rep: 43  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,338 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
The beliefs are but the god isn’t. Don’t ask me to explain why they make different claims, it’s based on how they interpret I assume
But if one says my god is this and the other says my god is that, is that not a diffrent god?
I’m just talking about the Jewish,Hebrew, and Christian God. It’s technically the same god. But like Hindus, they have different gods.
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:36 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46  Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:38 pm |
Beyond omnipotence and highest rank Rep: 43  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,338 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Sprry color 64 oes not illogically prove god, you would have to use color 99.R
---
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 04:41 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 48  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,773 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Sprry color 64 oes not illogically prove god, you would have to use color 99.R
We can not see the full spectrum of light, so illogically that disproves god I think I like thinking like a thiest to a thiest, for a thiest.
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 01 Feb 2008 06:54 pm |
NO EXCEPTIONS Rep: 56  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,202 ONLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Nope, I still believe in God. 
--- You’re My Best Friend
 | |
| 01 Feb 2008 09:30 pm |
bahaha--its me Guest | why no science? this isnt fair. i mean, its not like they can disprove God with science, but it just isnt fair taking science away from them. when ur trying to disprove God ur gonna need all the help u can get.
| |
| 01 Feb 2008 11:39 pm |
Regular Rep: 6 Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 329 OFFLINE | Yes, I do equal dumb. I dum dum in my num nums.
--- Message me!!!!
 | |
| 02 Feb 2008 12:32 am |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46  Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | Red_Calibur9 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Nope, I still believe in God. 
I wasn’t expecting you to stop believing in god. For one, belief is not a choice. You can’t instantly choose whether or not you believe in god, or whether you believe that special someone is “the one” and so on. If you made this topic to tell us to try and disprove god, then you are using the argument from ignorance. If you made this topic because you want to stop believing in god, then you have to do it yourself by observing the world around you and all the evidence from both sides until your mind comes to a conclusion of belief or disbelief, which takes a while BTW.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
 | |
| 02 Feb 2008 12:44 am |
NO EXCEPTIONS Rep: 56  Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 15,202 ONLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Red_Calibur9 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Nope, I still believe in God. 
I wasn’t expecting you to stop believing in god. For one, belief is not a choice. You can’t instantly choose whether or not you believe in god, or whether you believe that special someone is “the one” and so on. If you made this topic to tell us to try and disprove god, then you are using the argument from ignorance. If you made this topic because you want to stop believing in god, then you have to do it yourself by observing the world around you and all the evidence from both sides until your mind comes to a conclusion of belief or disbelief, which takes a while BTW.
Well, I daresay belief is a choice, but I didn’t plan on changing my beliefs anyway.
--- You’re My Best Friend
 | |
| 02 Feb 2008 03:19 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 43  Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 9,291 OFFLINE | catholics are VERY different from protestants. its almost become like two different religions.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
Yes they are... Even catholics diff to anglican and orthodoks...
---

“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 02 Feb 2008 11:11 am |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46  Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,433 OFFLINE | Red_Calibur9 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Red_Calibur9 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Your asking us to disprove god without science
logic is part of science
therefore we can’t use logic
therefore you want us to illogically disprove god
the sky is the color 64, therefore god does not exist.
Your argument phails.
Nope, I still believe in God. 
I wasn’t expecting you to stop believing in god. For one, belief is not a choice. You can’t instantly choose whether or not you believe in god, or whether you believe that special someone is “the one” and so on. If you made this topic to tell us to try and disprove god, then you are using the argument from ignorance. If you made this topic because you want to stop believing in god, then you have to do it yourself by observing the world around you and all the evidence from both sides until your mind comes to a conclusion of belief or disbelief, which takes a while BTW.
Well, I daresay belief is a choice, but I didn’t plan on changing my beliefs anyway.
You think belief is a choice eh? Do me a favor. Convert to Hinduism and try to believe in all of their gods. After you’ve attempted that, tell me if you still think belief is a choice.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
 Last edited 02 Feb 2008 11:13 am by ramunematt | |
| 02 Feb 2008 12:49 pm |
is causing chaos. Rep: 25  Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 8,135 OFFLINE | Red_Calibur9 wrote:
Try to disprove God to me. Make me believe that God doesn’t exist.
1 rule: You can’t use science.
Go.
Problem hither. It’s the theist’s job to prove God exists. Not the atheist’s job to disprove.
| |
| 02 Feb 2008 05:12 pm |
Beyond omnipotence and highest rank Rep: 43  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,338 OFFLINE | Totalitus wrote:
Red_Calibur9 wrote:
Try to disprove God to me. Make me believe that God doesn’t exist.
1 rule: You can’t use science.
Go.
Problem hither. It’s the theist’s job to prove God exists. Not the atheist’s job to disprove.
Is it? Is it because disproving is impossible?
---
 | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |