| 05 Feb 2008 06:20 pm |
Regular Rep: 0  Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 381 OFFLINE | I’d go with either one of these
 | |
|
| 05 Feb 2008 06:33 pm |
Guardian of MvC Rep: 85  Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 44,452 OFFLINE | 
or
For me.
BTW, would you mind making the image in your sig smaller? Maybe around 400 pixels in height?
 Last edited 05 Feb 2008 06:33 pm by Cid | |
| 05 Feb 2008 06:40 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 23 Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 4,121 ONLINE | | |
| 05 Feb 2008 06:41 pm |
SAMOŠ Rep: 34 Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 15,713 ONLINE | ---
 | |
| 05 Feb 2008 07:05 pm |
|
| 05 Feb 2008 07:20 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 31 Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 3,253 OFFLINE | Ulver-Natten’s Madrigal
Slayer-Reign In Blood
Pink Floyd-Dark Side Of The Moon
  | |
| 05 Feb 2008 09:06 pm |
you are smart Rep: 50 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 16,700 ONLINE | ---
 | |
| 05 Feb 2008 09:42 pm |
Oderint Dum Metuant Rep: 105 Joined: 07 Jan 2008 Posts: 37,486 ONLINE | Bob James-Three
Herbie Hancock-Headhunters
 | |
| 05 Feb 2008 09:45 pm |
Knight of Ratatosk Rep: 36 Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,179 ONLINE | Cid wrote:
or
For me.
BTW, would you mind making the image in your sig smaller? Maybe around 400 pixels in height?
Your sig is not any smaller, Cid. Even though you have two pictures. You can take out one.
 | |
| 05 Feb 2008 09:56 pm |
Guardian of MvC Rep: 85Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 44,452 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
Your sig is not any smaller, Cid. Even though you have two pictures. You can take out one.
Correction Marluxia. My signature amounts to around 400 pixels in height. John’s signature was just over 500 pixels.
| |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:00 pm |
Knight of Ratatosk Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,179 ONLINE | Cid wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
Your sig is not any smaller, Cid. Even though you have two pictures. You can take out one.
Correction Marluxia. My signature amounts to around 400 pixels in height. John’s signature was just over 500 pixels.
It’s still big for a sig. (Based on my opinion) 
And I don’t see why your first sig is necessary.
| |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:04 pm |
Knight of Ratatosk Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,179 ONLINE | John’s sig is 360 px by 360 px.
Yours are 359 px by 189 px and 350 px by 180 px. Total height= 369 px
Unless my computer is being a bitch again, I believe your sig is bigger. (Since I assume you are basing the sig size by height) ---
| |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:09 pm |
Guardian of MvC Rep: 85Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 44,452 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
John’s sig is 360 px by 360 px.
Yours are 359 px by 189 px and 350 px by 180 px. Total height= 369 px
Unless my computer is being a bitch again, I believe your sig is bigger. (Since I assume you are basing the sig size by height)
He changed his signature after I asked him to change it.
The other signature was about as large as this.
We’re allowed to have youtube videos in our signatures here. So my definition of too large is anything taller than a youtube video.
Last edited 05 Feb 2008 10:10 pm by Cid | |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:11 pm |
Guardian of MvC Rep: 85Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 44,452 OFFLINE | Actually, he has the image in his profile now. This is what he had before.
| |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:11 pm |
Knight of Ratatosk Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,179 ONLINE | Cid wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
John’s sig is 360 px by 360 px.
Yours are 359 px by 189 px and 350 px by 180 px. Total height= 369 px
Unless my computer is being a bitch again, I believe your sig is bigger. (Since I assume you are basing the sig size by height)
He changed his signature after I asked him to change it.
The other signature was about as large as this.
The we’re allowed to have youtube videos in our signatures here. So my definition of too large is anything taller than a youtube video.
I see. My bad.
Then again, Youtube video for a sig is ridiculous. I understand links, but... Video? That’s going little overboard with 'expressing yourself through a sig.' Well, I guess that’s how things are here.
| |
| 05 Feb 2008 10:42 pm |
|
| 06 Feb 2008 03:50 am |
Regular Rep: 0Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 381 OFFLINE | | |
|
|
Post Reply |
First ]
»
Music
» Best CD Cover
