| 22 Feb 2008 01:48 am |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | bant car dice wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Out of all the religions in the world your is the right one the only right one.
that is how lots of people think
i thought of that back when i was a christian
every single person is convinced beyond a doubt that there religion is right
and now they can’t all be right...
pretty ignorant people out there
Yes their is...Gooodnight I just got done sending itachi packing.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
|
| 22 Feb 2008 01:56 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25 Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,034 OFFLINE | Hey, here’s one you left out:
Argumentum ad logicam
This is the “fallacy fallacy” of arguing that a proposition is false because it has been presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument. Remember always that fallacious arguments can arrive at true conclusions.
“Take the fraction 16/64. Now, canceling a six on top and a six on the bottom, we get that 16/64 = 1/4."
“Wait a second! You can’t just cancel the six!"
“Oh, so you’re telling us 16/64 is not equal to 1/4, are you?" ---
 | |
| 22 Feb 2008 01:59 am |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
Hey, here’s one you left out:
Argumentum ad logicam
This is the “fallacy fallacy” of arguing that a proposition is false because it has been presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument. Remember always that fallacious arguments can arrive at true conclusions.
“Take the fraction 16/64. Now, canceling a six on top and a six on the bottom, we get that 16/64 = 1/4."
“Wait a second! You can’t just cancel the six!"
“Oh, so you’re telling us 16/64 is not equal to 1/4, are you?“
Goodnight  or morning 
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 22 Feb 2008 07:38 am |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63 Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
Hey, here’s one you left out:
Argumentum ad logicam
This is the “fallacy fallacy” of arguing that a proposition is false because it has been presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument. Remember always that fallacious arguments can arrive at true conclusions.
“Take the fraction 16/64. Now, canceling a six on top and a six on the bottom, we get that 16/64 = 1/4."
“Wait a second! You can’t just cancel the six!"
“Oh, so you’re telling us 16/64 is not equal to 1/4, are you?“
This doesn’t always work obviously
 | |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:11 pm |
Banned Rep: 51 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,808 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Go outside and look around you. Theres your proof.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
All I see just atheist...
Ignorance is not bliss.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | |
| 22 Feb 2008 03:17 pm |
Regular Rep: 2 Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Ignorance is not bliss.
Is that a fallacy? In my observation, the simple-minded can be some of the most contented folks around. People who don’t live among lions and haven’t heard them don’t fear them. People who don’t live in crime and don’t have TV to inform them of it don’t fear getting mugged.
I don’t think I need to bring up the Cypher reference from the Matrix, do I? I kind of wanna. I like that movie!
 | |
| 22 Feb 2008 03:28 pm |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,017 OFFLINE | Acrosurge wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Ignorance is not bliss.
Is that a fallacy? In my observation, the simple-minded can be some of the most contented folks around. People who don’t live among lions and haven’t heard them don’t fear them. People who don’t live in crime and don’t have TV to inform them of it don’t fear getting mugged.
I don’t think I need to bring up the Cypher reference from the Matrix, do I? I kind of wanna. I like that movie!
Yes Im sure he has never seen nature before.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 22 Feb 2008 03:40 pm |
Regular Rep: 2Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Yes Im sure he has never seen nature before.
*is tempted to plunge into a Green Hippie tirade about the purity of nature*
... Simplify, man...
*decides against it*
| |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply |
»
Religion
» Common fallacies.
