That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
firewolf81 wrote:
I was pondering the extinction of the plague on mother nature that is the human race but was trying to steer away from mass genocide seeing as I have become quite attached to a few of this irritatingly destructive species and I realized the way to destroy the human race without killing a single person was obvious.
Infertility.
If i could render the human race as a whole infertile, then we would die out in a few generations and blam....mission accomplished.
he delivery system would have to be a staged process with the effects culminating after a year or so otherwise someone would find out the delivery system and ruin everything:/
and we can’t have that.......
So yeah.....time to nut out the entire process and get cracking.
nahh!!! **gives kisses on the forehead** now now baby you go to bed and forget about all this nonsens
That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
And ya! I want to have kids. So...no dice!
Ahhh but its ot just Humans that care about the enviroment, nature itself cares, the animals care, its just that humans are far o self absorbed and ignorant to see it.
I appreciate that not all of the human race is bad and not all people are happy with the idea of not having children, but something must be done to stop the downwards spiral.
Oh and rendering the human race infertile is not genocide seeing as genocide is by definition 'Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group' so seeing as I would be merely halting the reproduction of the species without discrimination it wouldn’t be genocide.
Oh and on your interesting sugestion on ending my life, I already done that and came back. Someone didn’t want me dead and since then I have had a ever increasing kinship with nature, much stronger than the one I had in my previous life.
Sure I could end my life and reduce our biological footprint a little but it wouldn’t be enough. Something needs to be done on a global scale and trust me, if taking my own life again would cure all that ails the earth I would do so in a heart beat, but it won’t.
Humans as a species are a destructive obnoxious race that seeks to conquer and convert everything for their own gain with little regard of keeping the balance with nature that almost every other species seems to have no trouble doing.
We have committed a great many acts of genocide on a great many species without any thought to the environmental impact we have had.
That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
And ya! I want to have kids. So...no dice!
Ahhh but its ot just Humans that care about the enviroment, nature itself cares, the animals care, its just that humans are far o self absorbed and ignorant to see it.
I appreciate that not all of the human race is bad and not all people are happy with the idea of not having children, but something must be done to stop the downwards spiral.
Oh and rendering the human race infertile is not genocide seeing as genocide is by definition 'Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group' so seeing as I would be merely halting the reproduction of the species without discrimination it wouldn’t be genocide.
Oh and on your interesting sugestion on ending my life, I already done that and came back. Someone didn’t want me dead and since then I have had a ever increasing kinship with nature, much stronger than the one I had in my previous life.
Sure I could end my life and reduce our biological footprint a little but it wouldn’t be enough. Something needs to be done on a global scale and trust me, if taking my own life again would cure all that ails the earth I would do so in a heart beat, but it won’t.
Humans as a species are a destructive obnoxious race that seeks to conquer and convert everything for their own gain with little regard of keeping the balance with nature that almost every other species seems to have no trouble doing.
We have committed a great many acts of genocide on a great many species without any thought to the environmental impact we have had.
In short we are a blight against nature.
Doesn’t change the fact that I want to, and plan on, having children. Lest my spouse disagrees.
The easiest way to do any real damage would be distributing some kind of chemical through the water, but that’d be pretty hard to pull off due to the amount of security in water processing plants. And even if you got it past that stage, household water filters could be a hindrance.
You could try taking the plan airborn, but then you risk the very animals you’re fighting to protect.
It’d be nigh impossible to put such a plan into motion. You should probably just try to take care of problems locally and fight to get others to realize that they need to change.
I shall keep you informed as developments arise...without giving too much away.
There are a great many people in power that would seek to halt my plan for the human race all in the name of self preservation, however there are those in power that share my concerns and we shall converse on the matter at hand.
That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
And ya! I want to have kids. So...no dice!
Ahhh but its ot just Humans that care about the enviroment, nature itself cares, the animals care, its just that humans are far o self absorbed and ignorant to see it.
I appreciate that not all of the human race is bad and not all people are happy with the idea of not having children, but something must be done to stop the downwards spiral.
Oh and rendering the human race infertile is not genocide seeing as genocide is by definition 'Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group' so seeing as I would be merely halting the reproduction of the species without discrimination it wouldn’t be genocide.
Oh and on your interesting sugestion on ending my life, I already done that and came back. Someone didn’t want me dead and since then I have had a ever increasing kinship with nature, much stronger than the one I had in my previous life.
Sure I could end my life and reduce our biological footprint a little but it wouldn’t be enough. Something needs to be done on a global scale and trust me, if taking my own life again would cure all that ails the earth I would do so in a heart beat, but it won’t.
Humans as a species are a destructive obnoxious race that seeks to conquer and convert everything for their own gain with little regard of keeping the balance with nature that almost every other species seems to have no trouble doing.
We have committed a great many acts of genocide on a great many species without any thought to the environmental impact we have had.
In short we are a blight against nature.
Doesn’t change the fact that I want to, and plan on, having children. Lest my spouse disagrees.
The easiest way to do any real damage would be distributing some kind of chemical through the water, but that’d be pretty hard to pull off due to the amount of security in water processing plants. And even if you got it past that stage, household water filters could be a hindrance.
You could try taking the plan airborn, but then you risk the very animals you’re fighting to protect.
It’d be nigh impossible to put such a plan into motion. You should probably just try to take care of problems locally and fight to get others to realize that they need to change.
We are a nation founded on consumable and disposable products.
Toothpaste, hairspray, vitamins, bottled water, chewing gum, shampoos ect...the list goes on.
The right chemicals formulated to be part of these products would ensure that the virus/bacteria/chemicals would reach their intended target.
Much simpler as security on factories is much more lax and seeing as there are a sheer number of variables, it would be hard to track down the source of the contamination until it was too late, especially when it could be a number of chemicals found in different products that when combined over the years have a cumulative effect resulting in infertility.
firewolf81 wrote:
I was pondering the extinction of the plague on mother nature that is the human race but was trying to steer away from mass genocide seeing as I have become quite attached to a few of this irritatingly destructive species and I realized the way to destroy the human race without killing a single person was obvious.
Infertility.
If i could render the human race as a whole infertile, then we would die out in a few generations and blam....mission accomplished.
he delivery system would have to be a staged process with the effects culminating after a year or so otherwise someone would find out the delivery system and ruin everything:/
and we can’t have that.......
So yeah.....time to nut out the entire process and get cracking.
to manny big wordss so i have no clue what u just said
That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
And ya! I want to have kids. So...no dice!
Ahhh but its ot just Humans that care about the enviroment, nature itself cares, the animals care, its just that humans are far o self absorbed and ignorant to see it.
I appreciate that not all of the human race is bad and not all people are happy with the idea of not having children, but something must be done to stop the downwards spiral.
Oh and rendering the human race infertile is not genocide seeing as genocide is by definition 'Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group' so seeing as I would be merely halting the reproduction of the species without discrimination it wouldn’t be genocide.
Oh and on your interesting sugestion on ending my life, I already done that and came back. Someone didn’t want me dead and since then I have had a ever increasing kinship with nature, much stronger than the one I had in my previous life.
Sure I could end my life and reduce our biological footprint a little but it wouldn’t be enough. Something needs to be done on a global scale and trust me, if taking my own life again would cure all that ails the earth I would do so in a heart beat, but it won’t.
Humans as a species are a destructive obnoxious race that seeks to conquer and convert everything for their own gain with little regard of keeping the balance with nature that almost every other species seems to have no trouble doing.
We have committed a great many acts of genocide on a great many species without any thought to the environmental impact we have had.
In short we are a blight against nature.
Doesn’t change the fact that I want to, and plan on, having children. Lest my spouse disagrees.
The easiest way to do any real damage would be distributing some kind of chemical through the water, but that’d be pretty hard to pull off due to the amount of security in water processing plants. And even if you got it past that stage, household water filters could be a hindrance.
You could try taking the plan airborn, but then you risk the very animals you’re fighting to protect.
It’d be nigh impossible to put such a plan into motion. You should probably just try to take care of problems locally and fight to get others to realize that they need to change.
We are a nation founded on consumable and disposable products.
Toothpaste, hairspray, vitamins, bottled water, chewing gum, shampoos ect...the list goes on.
The right chemicals formulated to be part of these products would ensure that the virus/bacteria/chemicals would reach their intended target.
Much simpler as security on factories is much more lax and seeing as there are a sheer number of variables, it would be hard to track down the source of the contamination until it was too late, especially when it could be a number of chemicals found in different products that when combined over the years have a cumulative effect resulting in infertility.
Oh and before you say anything....money talks..
All of those products undergo a quality control test before being packaged. And before that, the things that go into the product are tested before they’re shipped out.
Companies aren’t as careless as you might think. If it were that simple, it would have been done already through bio terrorism .
That would mean a mass genocide and plus nukes have a negative impact on the earth and thats what I am trying to eliminate...
You see, I hate the human species with a hatred that burns hotter than the depths of hell itself.
I love mother nature and this earth more han life itself, so yeah...nukes....NO WAY!
wouldn’t killing yourself solve this problem? (NOT an actual suggestion...only a hypothetical one) (an unrealistic option for an unrealistic suggestion) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
p.s. eliminating the ability to reproduce is still a form of mass genocide (of the species) isn’t it?
And what does it matter what form the earth is in if all the humans are gone? The “environment” doesn’t care...it’s just there. It’s only humans that put a value on it...
And ya! I want to have kids. So...no dice!
Ahhh but its ot just Humans that care about the enviroment, nature itself cares, the animals care, its just that humans are far o self absorbed and ignorant to see it.
I appreciate that not all of the human race is bad and not all people are happy with the idea of not having children, but something must be done to stop the downwards spiral.
Oh and rendering the human race infertile is not genocide seeing as genocide is by definition 'Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group' so seeing as I would be merely halting the reproduction of the species without discrimination it wouldn’t be genocide.
Oh and on your interesting sugestion on ending my life, I already done that and came back. Someone didn’t want me dead and since then I have had a ever increasing kinship with nature, much stronger than the one I had in my previous life.
Sure I could end my life and reduce our biological footprint a little but it wouldn’t be enough. Something needs to be done on a global scale and trust me, if taking my own life again would cure all that ails the earth I would do so in a heart beat, but it won’t.
Humans as a species are a destructive obnoxious race that seeks to conquer and convert everything for their own gain with little regard of keeping the balance with nature that almost every other species seems to have no trouble doing.
We have committed a great many acts of genocide on a great many species without any thought to the environmental impact we have had.
In short we are a blight against nature.
Doesn’t change the fact that I want to, and plan on, having children. Lest my spouse disagrees.
The easiest way to do any real damage would be distributing some kind of chemical through the water, but that’d be pretty hard to pull off due to the amount of security in water processing plants. And even if you got it past that stage, household water filters could be a hindrance.
You could try taking the plan airborn, but then you risk the very animals you’re fighting to protect.
It’d be nigh impossible to put such a plan into motion. You should probably just try to take care of problems locally and fight to get others to realize that they need to change.
We are a nation founded on consumable and disposable products.
Toothpaste, hairspray, vitamins, bottled water, chewing gum, shampoos ect...the list goes on.
The right chemicals formulated to be part of these products would ensure that the virus/bacteria/chemicals would reach their intended target.
Much simpler as security on factories is much more lax and seeing as there are a sheer number of variables, it would be hard to track down the source of the contamination until it was too late, especially when it could be a number of chemicals found in different products that when combined over the years have a cumulative effect resulting in infertility.
Oh and before you say anything....money talks..
All of those products undergo a quality control test before being packaged. And before that, the things that go into the product are tested before they’re shipped out.
Companies aren’t as careless as you might think. If it were that simple, it would have been done already through bio terrorism .
And you think bio terrorism doesn’t happen?
Its just covered up well.
Whos to stop me from making my own set of products with a like minded famous individual and negate or falsify the quality control procedures or mix it into certain batches?
You have to realize that this would be effective across the entire world so sub divisions of companies spread across all parts of the globe would be targeted.
Quality control can be compromised with the right person and the right amount of money thrown at the situation. politicians and famous people have been buying their way out of trouble for years and there is also the aspect of the church and their influence on people and organizations too.
You would be surprised as to how many people think the same way I do.
Its just a matter of organization and influence to get the job done.
As much as you fear it, it might just happen and like I said, there are ways of staggering the chemical loading to effect the time frame that the chemical and biological reaction take place, meaning that thew final dose of product could be administered years down the track after all other traces of tainted product has been lost and forgotten, hence completing the reaction and rendering millions of people infertile.
It would take months for patterns to emerge on the fertility rates of individuals and at least a year for the world to realize there is a world wide threat of infertility.
Not to mention there is also the fail safe kill switch of killing off individuals that have developed a awareness to our plans and seek to prevent the rightful extinction of the human race.
It is humane in the fact that yall can still fuck like animals, eat, kill each other and live to a ripe old age, however there will be no more children born to carry on mankind’s legacy of destruction and pollution.
Even if it was used in small doses on certain groups of individuals to serve as a warning initially to amend our ways or face extinction...we are just delaying the inevitable destruction of our entire species.
Our way is humane, the rest of the world would see us bur to death in a hail of nuclear warfare that would wipe out a majority of species of animals on this earth and create another iceage.
Why should the rest of the earth suffer for our lack of control?
»
Off-Topic
» I figured out a way to end the human race.
) (and this suggestion simply eliminates one human from the earth, but more importantly means that you no longer have to live in a world such as this one...however it does not solve the problem that you wish to address...but it still sorta does...indirectly.)
. So...no dice!
agreed...better sleep on it Wolfy
