| 19 Feb 2008 06:28 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
I like the part about the fat people.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
|
| 19 Feb 2008 06:31 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Animals breathe too and I don’t want to kill them, unless their delicious but thats another question.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:35 pm |
Dark God Rep: 36 Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,181 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Animals breathe too and I don’t want to kill them, unless their delicious but thats another question.
We kill cows like there is no today. (Burgers) You should see how they are slaughtered.
Slit on the throat until they bleed to death, and chop the body into pieces.
And no. Animals do not increase in population as dramatically as humans do. Most of the animals are kept at the constant rate in terms of population.
Humans, experience exponential growth. Unless another Ice Age kills them all... | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:37 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Animals breathe too and I don’t want to kill them, unless their delicious but thats another question.
We kill cows like there is no today. (Burgers) You should see how they are slaughtered.
Slit on the throat until they bleed to death, and chop the body into pieces.
And no. Animals do not increase in population as dramatically as humans do. Most of the animals are kept at the constant rate in terms of population.
Humans, experience exponential growth. Unless another Ice Age kills them all...
Then do something abot it just don’t type I want the future species of this planet to have a healthy one.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:40 pm |
Dark God Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,181 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Animals breathe too and I don’t want to kill them, unless their delicious but thats another question.
We kill cows like there is no today. (Burgers) You should see how they are slaughtered.
Slit on the throat until they bleed to death, and chop the body into pieces.
And no. Animals do not increase in population as dramatically as humans do. Most of the animals are kept at the constant rate in terms of population.
Humans, experience exponential growth. Unless another Ice Age kills them all...
Then do something abot it just don’t type I want the future species of this planet to have a healthy one.
I could technically risk my life to hack into military computer and launch tons of l453r5 at those damn southerners. >  | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:43 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Animals breathe too and I don’t want to kill them, unless their delicious but thats another question.
We kill cows like there is no today. (Burgers) You should see how they are slaughtered.
Slit on the throat until they bleed to death, and chop the body into pieces.
And no. Animals do not increase in population as dramatically as humans do. Most of the animals are kept at the constant rate in terms of population.
Humans, experience exponential growth. Unless another Ice Age kills them all...
Then do something abot it just don’t type I want the future species of this planet to have a healthy one.
I could technically risk my life to hack into military computer and launch tons of l453r5 at those damn southerners. >
Hack away,but the goverment has some very skilled hackers already working for them you think you could out hack them.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:43 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 24 Joined: 03 Apr 2007 Posts: 1,624 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
One of the main causes is respiration.
I think we should decrease human population. Somehow. Support Al Gore!
Pahahaha.
There are billions upon billions upon billions of respiring animals who put out far more CO2 than humans do through breathing.
It’s completely irrelevant: the planet has it’s own natural way of locking up carbon dioxide, albeit a slow process. The problem begins when we unload 65 million years worth of stored CO2 in 150 years. The planet can’t cope.
Breathing has fuck all to do with it.
Weapon of Mass Percussion
SoB Admin | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:45 pm |
Dark God Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,181 OFFLINE | DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
One of the main causes is respiration.
I think we should decrease human population. Somehow. Support Al Gore!
Pahahaha.
There are billions upon billions upon billions of respiring animals who put out far more CO2 than humans do through breathing.
It’s completely irrelevant: the planet has it’s own natural way of locking up carbon dioxide, albeit a slow process. The problem begins when we unload 65 million years worth of stored CO2 in 150 years. The planet can’t cope.
Breathing has fuck all to do with it.
Yes. Yes it does. It may seem insignificant at this point, but seeing how human population doubles, triples every 10 or so years, I doubt it will maintain that insignificance. (And at the same time, killing trees for land development for more space) | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:46 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
One of the main causes is respiration.
I think we should decrease human population. Somehow. Support Al Gore!
Pahahaha.
There are billions upon billions upon billions of respiring animals who put out far more CO2 than humans do through breathing.
It’s completely irrelevant: the planet has it’s own natural way of locking up carbon dioxide, albeit a slow process. The problem begins when we unload 65 million years worth of stored CO2 in 150 years. The planet can’t cope.
Breathing has fuck all to do with it.
I said that already but you put the facts behind it 
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:48 pm |
Regular Rep: 5 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 646 OFFLINE | We could always freexe ourselves and wait for the earth to repair itself ---
  | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:49 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Zeldafreak wrote:
We could always freexe ourselves and wait for the earth to repair itself
What does “freexe"mean?
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:53 pm |
Regular Rep: 5Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 646 OFFLINE | I meant freeze.... ---
| |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:54 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 24Joined: 03 Apr 2007 Posts: 1,624 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
One of the main causes is respiration.
I think we should decrease human population. Somehow. Support Al Gore!
Pahahaha.
There are billions upon billions upon billions of respiring animals who put out far more CO2 than humans do through breathing.
It’s completely irrelevant: the planet has it’s own natural way of locking up carbon dioxide, albeit a slow process. The problem begins when we unload 65 million years worth of stored CO2 in 150 years. The planet can’t cope.
Breathing has fuck all to do with it.
Yes. Yes it does. It may seem insignificant at this point, but seeing how human population doubles, triples every 10 or so years, I doubt it will maintain that insignificance. (And at the same time, killing trees for land development for more space)
No, you’re a moron.
Overconsumption is a problem. Breathing is not.
Weapon of Mass Percussion
SoB Admin | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:58 pm |
Regular Rep: 5Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 646 OFFLINE | When we breathe out the trees take in the carbon monoxide we breathe out using it to make more oxygen breathing isn’t the problem ---
| |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:58 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
Dhem92 wrote:
No we get rid of cars.
Over weight people would be forced to walk to where they’re going. - Obesity/ world hunger
No cars polluting the air - Air pollution
This may not count, but people wouldn’t get mad at each other on the road. - Rudeness
Car accidents kill thousands, but no car equals no car accidents. - Car deaths/ injuries.
You forget respiration. There should be less humans. Not more. More deaths=Needed
Wouldn’t car accidents help decrease the population.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:58 pm |
Dark God Rep: 36Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5,181 OFFLINE | Zeldafreak wrote:
When we breathe out the trees take in the carbon monoxide we breathe out using it to make more oxygen breathing isn’t the problem
Not if deforestation continues. | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:59 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 31 Joined: 23 Nov 2006 Posts: 4,456 OFFLINE | DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
DrumIntoTheNight wrote:
LordMarluxia wrote:
One of the main causes is respiration.
I think we should decrease human population. Somehow. Support Al Gore!
Pahahaha.
There are billions upon billions upon billions of respiring animals who put out far more CO2 than humans do through breathing.
It’s completely irrelevant: the planet has it’s own natural way of locking up carbon dioxide, albeit a slow process. The problem begins when we unload 65 million years worth of stored CO2 in 150 years. The planet can’t cope.
Breathing has fuck all to do with it.
Yes. Yes it does. It may seem insignificant at this point, but seeing how human population doubles, triples every 10 or so years, I doubt it will maintain that insignificance. (And at the same time, killing trees for land development for more space)
No, you’re a moron.
Overconsumption is a problem. Breathing is not.
Haha..I’m surprised you even bothered to comment.
Anyway, I did leave a response in the_pains topic about arctic melting 2013.
but I got to go now.
Click HERE and vote for the SOTW! | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:59 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | LordMarluxia wrote:
Zeldafreak wrote:
When we breathe out the trees take in the carbon monoxide we breathe out using it to make more oxygen breathing isn’t the problem
Not if deforestation continues.
Then do something already!!!
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 19 Feb 2008 06:59 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 24Joined: 03 Apr 2007 Posts: 1,624 OFFLINE | Zeldafreak wrote:
When we breathe out the trees take in the carbon monoxide we breathe out using it to make more oxygen breathing isn’t the problem
Precisely. The planet can deal with small amounts of CO2 (and believe me, the amounts we respire are so minute compared to what we expel every day from industry and energy).
Weapon of Mass Percussion
SoB Admin | |
| 19 Feb 2008 07:01 pm |
Regular Rep: 5Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 646 OFFLINE | Then we plant 2 trees for every tree cut ---
| |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Off-Topic
» I figured out a way to end Global Warming.
