| 21 Feb 2008 04:48 pm |
Regular Rep: 6 Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 329 OFFLINE | Which is it?
---
Science vs Atheism Science ******************* 75% (votes so far 6) Atheism ******* 25% (votes so far 2) Only registered users may vote.
Message me!!!!
 | |
 |
| 21 Feb 2008 07:40 pm |
The one and forever only... Rep: 39 Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,620 OFFLINE | Uh... Atheist don’t believe God
A lot of scientist do believe in god
what the fuck was the question?
---
God is evil God is pure God is neither God is God
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 21 Feb 2008 07:55 pm |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44 Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | O.O
---
 | |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:25 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 18 Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 1,826 OFFLINE | I see what he’s doing here. It’s pretty clever and shows the kind of shit Gplex is full of.
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:39 am |
The one and forever only... Rep: 39Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,620 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
I see what he’s doing here. It’s pretty clever and shows the kind of shit Gplex is full of.
What is he doing I know atheist that don’t believe they exist.
---
God is evil God is pure God is neither God is God
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 22 Feb 2008 06:24 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 12 Joined: 21 Jul 2007 Posts: 3,663 OFFLINE | yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
---
 __  Last edited 22 Feb 2008 07:27 am by seed | |
| 22 Feb 2008 07:36 am |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
Richard Dawkins addressed this. It’s quite simple, it’s not what it implies, in fact very little respected scientists don’t believe in evolution.
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:12 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 46 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,449 OFFLINE | seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
Actually a majority of scientists believe in evolution and the big bang. The ones who are creationists had little credibility to start with.
---
the21gamer wrote:
fuck that load of bullshit. i dont care if the enemy dies. not fighting back is stupid
 Last edited 22 Feb 2008 02:13 pm by ramunematt | |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:44 pm |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | ramunematt wrote:
seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
Actually a majority of scientists believe in evolution and the big bang. The ones who are creationists had little credibility to start with.
Yep. I just watched Richard Dawkins thing on that, well it is sort of like that.
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:48 pm |
Regular Rep: 1 Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
Actually a majority of scientists believe in evolution and the big bang. The ones who are creationists had little credibility to start with.
A “majority” of scientists also warned we were heading for a new Ice Age in the 70s.
Al Gore and his “majority” beg to differ.
---
 | |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:51 pm |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | Acrosurge wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
Actually a majority of scientists believe in evolution and the big bang. The ones who are creationists had little credibility to start with.
A “majority” of scientists also warned we were heading for a new Ice Age in the 70s.
Al Gore and his “majority” beg to differ.
We have come a long way since the 70’s and what credentials does Gore have? Last I checked, many scientists debunked his movie and said it was not going to happen as fast as he said. That was what I mean by debunk in case you ask.
Should I mention all the crazy Christians who said the world’s end was upon us for what? two thousand years?
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:57 pm |
Regular Rep: 1Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
We have come a long way since the 70’s and what credentials does Gore have? Last I checked, many scientists debunked his movie and said it was not going to happen as fast as he said.
You dare questions Al Gore’s credentials??? Why, a “majority” panel of UN scientists have declared that Global Warming will end us all within a century! Who are you to argue against a “majority”? The debate is over. If you argue otherwise, then you have no credibility.
Al Gore’s green van of suppression will come for you in the night. And your children. And your little dog.
*sarcasm* ^_^
---
Last edited 22 Feb 2008 03:00 pm by Acrosurge | |
| 22 Feb 2008 02:59 pm |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | Acrosurge wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
We have come a long way since the 70’s and what credentials does Gore have? Last I checked, many scientists debunked his movie and said it was not going to happen as fast as he said.
You dare questions Al Gore’s credentials??? Why, a “majority” panel of UN scientists have declared that Global Warming will end us all within a century! Who are you to argue against a UN “majority”? There is no debate. If you argue otherwise, then you have no credibility.
Al Gore’s green van of suppression will come for you in the night. And your children. And your little dog.
*sarcasm* ^_^
I was not claiming Global Warming isn’t happening, but many scientists in the field say Gore was wrong about how fast it would get us.
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 03:03 pm |
Regular Rep: 1Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Acrosurge wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
We have come a long way since the 70’s and what credentials does Gore have? Last I checked, many scientists debunked his movie and said it was not going to happen as fast as he said.
You dare questions Al Gore’s credentials??? Why, a “majority” panel of UN scientists have declared that Global Warming will end us all within a century! Who are you to argue against a UN “majority”? There is no debate. If you argue otherwise, then you have no credibility.
Al Gore’s green van of suppression will come for you in the night. And your children. And your little dog.
*sarcasm* ^_^
I was not claiming Global Warming isn’t happening, but many scientists in the field say Gore was wrong about how fast it would get us.
Many <<< Al Gore’s Majority. You and the dissenters lost all credibility by arguing. Al Gore said so.
*end sarcasm* You’re exactly right, Chibi. Many scientists also suggest that Global Climate Change is cyclical and natural. Point is, a majority of scientists said one thing in the 70s and a new “majority” say something different now. I think it wise to evaluate the evidence and form an opinion that doesn’t simply rely on a majority (not that you were suggesting this).
---
Last edited 22 Feb 2008 03:06 pm by Acrosurge | |
| 22 Feb 2008 03:59 pm |
The Aura is mine! Rep: 44Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 9,727 ONLINE | Well my whole original point was very little respected scientists believe in god.
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 04:23 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 48  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,788 OFFLINE | Atheism has never opposed science, or any facts, like a few other religions I could name. This is a pointless topic.
---
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 22 Feb 2008 04:55 pm |
Regular Rep: 1Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Atheism has never opposed science, or any facts, like a few other religions I could name. This is a pointless topic.
Would you then state that Atheism and Science are indistinguishable from one another?
---
| |
| 22 Feb 2008 04:57 pm |
The one and forever only... Rep: 39Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,620 OFFLINE | seed wrote:
yep they are some scientist beliving in god unlike athiest.
I HATE U <3<3
---
God is evil God is pure God is neither God is God
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 22 Feb 2008 05:06 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 48Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 4,788 OFFLINE | Acrosurge wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Atheism has never opposed science, or any facts, like a few other religions I could name. This is a pointless topic.
Would you then state that Atheism and Science are indistinguishable from one another?
Atheism is the result of a rational thought. No but they never conflict.
---
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 22 Feb 2008 05:13 pm |
Regular Rep: 1Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 224 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Acrosurge wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Atheism has never opposed science, or any facts, like a few other religions I could name. This is a pointless topic.
Would you then state that Atheism and Science are indistinguishable from one another?
Atheism is the result of a rational thought. No but they never conflict.
Would you then state that a scientist that is not an Atheist is not a scientist?
---
| |
|
Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Religion
» Science vs Atheism
First 
