| 07 Mar 2008 11:12 pm |
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post Guest | Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
What kind of pathetic attempt to make us look like hypocrites is this? Seriously, it’s a load of shit. Believing in ANY god, makes you Theist, it doesn’t matter which one(s). You can only be Atheist if you disbelieve in ALL of them.
Wrong
Just because Atheism is the rejection of every single God doesn’t mean Theism is acceptance of belief in every single God. Believing in one or more makes you Theist, believing in none at all makes you Atheist. If you can’t make up your mind, you’re agnostic. What the hell are you trying to do anyway?
Actually Atheist means you don’t believe in a diety or sepreme being. If your Christian do you believe in Odin?Allah?Zeus? No. Of course not, And I’m not trying to o anything besides inform you guys. It’s not like I’m trying to make theists look like idiots. | | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:15 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25  Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,023 ONLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
What kind of pathetic attempt to make us look like hypocrites is this? Seriously, it’s a load of shit. Believing in ANY god, makes you Theist, it doesn’t matter which one(s). You can only be Atheist if you disbelieve in ALL of them.
Wrong
Just because Atheism is the rejection of every single God doesn’t mean Theism is acceptance of belief in every single God. Believing in one or more makes you Theist, believing in none at all makes you Atheist. If you can’t make up your mind, you’re agnostic. What the hell are you trying to do anyway?
Actually Atheist means you don’t believe in a diety or sepreme being. If your Christian do you believe in Odin?Allah?Zeus? No. Of course not, And I’m not trying to o anything besides inform you guys. It’s not like I’m trying to make theists look like idiots.
Yeah, don’t believe in a diety or supreme being. But you seem to be confused towards whether this means any diety or all dieties. An Atheist must disbelieve in them all.
Btw, Allah just means “God” in Arabic. If you are a Christian over there you would use the word Allah also.
 Last edited 07 Mar 2008 11:16 pm by Sean of the Living | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:16 pm |
Nevae Anariva Rep: 49 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 9,975 | -sighs- Atheism is a disbelief in any deity, or “supreme being or beings."
It IS the disbelief in any god or gods, and literately any religion involving the former mentioned. ---
 | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:20 pm |
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post Guest | Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
What kind of pathetic attempt to make us look like hypocrites is this? Seriously, it’s a load of shit. Believing in ANY god, makes you Theist, it doesn’t matter which one(s). You can only be Atheist if you disbelieve in ALL of them.
Wrong
Just because Atheism is the rejection of every single God doesn’t mean Theism is acceptance of belief in every single God. Believing in one or more makes you Theist, believing in none at all makes you Atheist. If you can’t make up your mind, you’re agnostic. What the hell are you trying to do anyway?
Actually Atheist means you don’t believe in a diety or sepreme being. If your Christian do you believe in Odin?Allah?Zeus? No. Of course not, And I’m not trying to o anything besides inform you guys. It’s not like I’m trying to make theists look like idiots.
Yeah, don’t believe in a diety or supreme being. But you seem to be confused towards whether this means any diety or all dieties. An Atheist must disbelieve in them all.
Btw, Allah just means “God” in Arabic. If you are a Christian over there you would use the word Allah also.
Didn’t know Allah meant that in arabic. I just thought it was a name they gave him.
As for the point, I guess it depends on how you interpret the definition “A disbelief of a god or sepreme being" | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:22 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40 Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,811 OFFLINE | How about everyone has an X chromsome ---
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:33 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,023 ONLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
What kind of pathetic attempt to make us look like hypocrites is this? Seriously, it’s a load of shit. Believing in ANY god, makes you Theist, it doesn’t matter which one(s). You can only be Atheist if you disbelieve in ALL of them.
Wrong
Just because Atheism is the rejection of every single God doesn’t mean Theism is acceptance of belief in every single God. Believing in one or more makes you Theist, believing in none at all makes you Atheist. If you can’t make up your mind, you’re agnostic. What the hell are you trying to do anyway?
Actually Atheist means you don’t believe in a diety or sepreme being. If your Christian do you believe in Odin?Allah?Zeus? No. Of course not, And I’m not trying to o anything besides inform you guys. It’s not like I’m trying to make theists look like idiots.
Yeah, don’t believe in a diety or supreme being. But you seem to be confused towards whether this means any diety or all dieties. An Atheist must disbelieve in them all.
Btw, Allah just means “God” in Arabic. If you are a Christian over there you would use the word Allah also.
Didn’t know Allah meant that in arabic. I just thought it was a name they gave him.
As for the point, I guess it depends on how you interpret the definition “A disbelief of a god or sepreme being”
Why are you Atheists so picky with the EXACT definition for the word someone uses? I mean, once in a while when Gplex’s argument makes as much sense as Donnie Darko I’ll point out a spelling mistake, but this is ridiculous...
Last edited 07 Mar 2008 11:33 pm by Sean of the Living | | | 07 Mar 2008 11:36 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,811 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos guest post wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
What kind of pathetic attempt to make us look like hypocrites is this? Seriously, it’s a load of shit. Believing in ANY god, makes you Theist, it doesn’t matter which one(s). You can only be Atheist if you disbelieve in ALL of them.
Wrong
Just because Atheism is the rejection of every single God doesn’t mean Theism is acceptance of belief in every single God. Believing in one or more makes you Theist, believing in none at all makes you Atheist. If you can’t make up your mind, you’re agnostic. What the hell are you trying to do anyway?
Actually Atheist means you don’t believe in a diety or sepreme being. If your Christian do you believe in Odin?Allah?Zeus? No. Of course not, And I’m not trying to o anything besides inform you guys. It’s not like I’m trying to make theists look like idiots.
Yeah, don’t believe in a diety or supreme being. But you seem to be confused towards whether this means any diety or all dieties. An Atheist must disbelieve in them all.
Btw, Allah just means “God” in Arabic. If you are a Christian over there you would use the word Allah also.
Didn’t know Allah meant that in arabic. I just thought it was a name they gave him.
As for the point, I guess it depends on how you interpret the definition “A disbelief of a god or sepreme being”
Why are you Atheists so picky with the EXACT definition for the word someone uses? I mean, once in a while when Gplex’s argument makes as much sense as Donnie Darko I’ll point out a spelling mistake, but this is ridiculous...
Atheists you judgemental prick
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:41 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,014 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Atheism: disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.
Definition encompasses all supreme beings that can be classified as gods.
I have seen a cat, does this mean I have seen every cat. No. a god is 1 god not all.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:44 am |
The Pendragon Rep: 34 Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 48,244 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Atheism: disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.
Definition encompasses all supreme beings that can be classified as gods.
I have seen a cat, does this mean I have seen every cat. No. a god is 1 god not all.
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
-={Amin Wile Ilyamenie Liy End Rimmi Llie}=-
 Last edited 08 Mar 2008 12:44 am by Tyreaus Rhade | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:47 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,014 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
Why are you Atheists so picky with the EXACT definition for the word someone uses? I mean, once in a while when Gplex’s argument makes as much sense as Donnie Darko I’ll point out a spelling mistake, but this is ridiculous...
You mean once and a while when I am debating with 10 people at once... alright try to make me look like a donnie darko, what ever that is.
But the fact is everyone including thiest, that have quoted from a source as made basicly the same difinition.
You are a idiot who actually thinks that because someone misspelled a word that makes them retarted. This is a freaken forum not a some science thesis that you need to hand in tommorow.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:49 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50 Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | I have seen a cat, does this mean I have seen every cat. No. a god is 1 god not all.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
Have you seen ghost with naked eyes...???
Can sciences catch such ghosts...???
If can then I want proof... ---
 
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:51 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,014 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
Why should it be? You want it like this : “disbelief in the existence of deities”
atheism : Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:53 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,014 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
I have seen a cat, does this mean I have seen every cat. No. a god is 1 god not all.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
Have you seen ghost with naked eyes...???
Can sciences catch such ghosts...???
If can then I want proof...
Ghost are not real? How can I claim this... because I can claim this because it is in the same situation as the invisible untangable unicorn that follows me around all day but not night, and not when people are watching... the same goes for your god.
Next time try to stick to the topic.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:53 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 1,404 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
I have seen a cat, does this mean I have seen every cat. No. a god is 1 god not all.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
Have you seen ghost with naked eyes...???
Can sciences catch such ghosts...???
If can then I want proof...
Well I have seen some stuff on tv where a guy anilizes footage and we see his analisys. Pretty wierd stuff. But...Hey I do believe in ghosts, I don’t believe there are nesicarrily dead people. More like...something unexplanable for now. Perhaps they exist in other diminsions, perhaps you know, in the future there is time travel and some criminals like fucking with us. Who knows whats going on. | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:58 am |
The Pendragon Rep: 34Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 48,244 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
Why should it be? You want it like this : “disbelief in the existence of deities”
atheism : Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
I’m just going to say this on a personal note: I think this has to be the most redundant and idiotic discussion to ever take place. I will not give reason why I think this, as I am sure many people already know.
Now, theism is the belief in a deity or deities. The A- prefix is used to denote, in the word atheism, that one lacks the item that is being talked about, lit. the belief in a deity or deities.
A theist would need one or more, where an atheist would need zero.
I am sure this has been stated before, by who I can remember not.
If you wished to get technical from a psychological standpoint, religious people would be atheist to a person of a belief that does not believe in the same or a similar deity, since they would not believe in the deity the other worshipped. Yet, religious people still believe in a deity, meaning we have a technical theism.
-={Amin Wile Ilyamenie Liy End Rimmi Llie}=-
| | | 08 Mar 2008 12:59 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | Ghost are not real? How can I claim this... because I can claim this because it is in the same situation as the invisible untangable unicorn that follows me around all day but not night, and not when people are watching... the same goes for your god.
Next time try to stick to the topic.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
You eat your own words... You said you believe snakes comes out from someones mouth can you explain me with sciences... or something...???
Evolution... Geez thats boring nothing else can be claimed by those evolutionist except assumptions...
If the monkey skull were founded 10000 years after it will be said human evolution...
Simple as that... ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | | | 08 Mar 2008 12:59 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 1,404 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
Why should it be? You want it like this : “disbelief in the existence of deities”
atheism : Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
I’m just going to say this on a personal note: I think this has to be the most redundant and idiotic discussion to ever take place. I will not give reason why I think this, as I am sure many people already know.
Now, theism is the belief in a deity or deities. The A- prefix is used to denote, in the word atheism, that one lacks the item that is being talked about, lit. the belief in a deity or deities.
A theist would need one or more, where an atheist would need zero.
I am sure this has been stated before, by who I can remember not.
If you wished to get technical from a psychological standpoint, religious people would be atheist to a person of a belief that does not believe in the same or a similar deity, since they would not believe in the deity the other worshipped. Yet, religious people still believe in a deity, meaning we have a technical theism.
The fact is your still atheistic to other religions that are not your own. | | | 08 Mar 2008 01:00 am |
The Pendragon Rep: 34Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 48,244 OFFLINE | RebornChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
Why should it be? You want it like this : “disbelief in the existence of deities”
atheism : Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
I’m just going to say this on a personal note: I think this has to be the most redundant and idiotic discussion to ever take place. I will not give reason why I think this, as I am sure many people already know.
Now, theism is the belief in a deity or deities. The A- prefix is used to denote, in the word atheism, that one lacks the item that is being talked about, lit. the belief in a deity or deities.
A theist would need one or more, where an atheist would need zero.
I am sure this has been stated before, by who I can remember not.
If you wished to get technical from a psychological standpoint, religious people would be atheist to a person of a belief that does not believe in the same or a similar deity, since they would not believe in the deity the other worshipped. Yet, religious people still believe in a deity, meaning we have a technical theism.
The fact is your still atheistic to other religions that are not your own.
That’s why I said from the psychological standpoint, but in writing and most other standpoints we are theistic because of our belief in our own God.
-={Amin Wile Ilyamenie Liy End Rimmi Llie}=-
| | | 08 Mar 2008 01:02 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | God is exist... hell you even not belief about the proof... ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | | | 08 Mar 2008 01:02 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 1,404 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
RebornChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Gplex wrote:
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
The part of the definition I feel you should more specifically look at is “or beings." If it was just “disbelief in the existence of a supreme being," such a statement would prove true, yet the latter part does exist.
Why should it be? You want it like this : “disbelief in the existence of deities”
atheism : Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
I’m just going to say this on a personal note: I think this has to be the most redundant and idiotic discussion to ever take place. I will not give reason why I think this, as I am sure many people already know.
Now, theism is the belief in a deity or deities. The A- prefix is used to denote, in the word atheism, that one lacks the item that is being talked about, lit. the belief in a deity or deities.
A theist would need one or more, where an atheist would need zero.
I am sure this has been stated before, by who I can remember not.
If you wished to get technical from a psychological standpoint, religious people would be atheist to a person of a belief that does not believe in the same or a similar deity, since they would not believe in the deity the other worshipped. Yet, religious people still believe in a deity, meaning we have a technical theism.
The fact is your still atheistic to other religions that are not your own.
That’s why I said from the psychological standpoint, but in writing and most other standpoints we are theistic because of our belief in our own God.
Well when I made this topic I was going at a psychological standpoint. But yes, you are right at the last point,when we are not on a psychological standpoint. | | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
|
»
Religion
» Everyone is atheist
