| 05 Mar 2008 04:27 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 6  Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3,602 OFFLINE | If an atheist commits murder in a completely secular world should he be let off the hook because we have a problem with over population and he’s doing us a favor any way?
I’m just trying to figure out what type of world matt wants for us. ---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it." | |
|
| 05 Mar 2008 04:34 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63 Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,450 ONLINE | Weasel 16 wrote:
If an atheist commits murder in a completely secular world should he be let off the hook because we have a problem with over population and he’s doing us a favor any way?
I’m just trying to figure out what type of world matt wants for us.
What the fuck? What kind of world do YOU want us to live in?
 | |
| 05 Mar 2008 10:22 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40 Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,811 OFFLINE | Is it a supervillain world? ---
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 06 Mar 2008 12:30 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25 Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,026 ONLINE | It wouldn’t be this bad. There’s a difference between Atheism and a kind of Darwainist Anarchy... ---
 | |
| 06 Mar 2008 12:44 am |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,811 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
It wouldn’t be this bad. There’s a difference between Atheism and a kind of Darwainist Anarchy...
 I didn’t know their was a Darwainist Anarchy.
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 06 Mar 2008 05:47 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 6Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3,602 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Weasel 16 wrote:
If an atheist commits murder in a completely secular world should he be let off the hook because we have a problem with over population and he’s doing us a favor any way?
I’m just trying to figure out what type of world matt wants for us.
What the fuck? What kind of world do YOU want us to live in?
A completely peaceful one where people are tolerant of different people and different ways of looking at things and try to better them selves, a world with out radicals.
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it." | |
| 06 Mar 2008 05:52 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50 Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | Matt want people to leave their religions since he think atheism is the right way... ---
 
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 06 Mar 2008 05:55 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | I think they want world with no religion and system...
they can do everything withouit rules bonding them... ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 06 Mar 2008 10:07 pm |
Banned Rep: 51 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | 1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion. ---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | |
| 07 Mar 2008 12:54 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,026 ONLINE | ramuenmatt wrote:
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Ramuenmatt wrote:
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion.
^ That’s what I was trying to say...
Why the hell are you all so fussy about the exact term we use for something? If you can’t translate that into something you’re more comfortable with then change it to “Anything goes” “Survival of the fittest” or “Social Darwainism"
| |
| 07 Mar 2008 06:01 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 6Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3,602 OFFLINE | 1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
when have you not?
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Clearly no imagination, typical really.
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
would I be tolerant by continuing to do this to you? or would i be anoyoing?
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
Just what every dulled down bumble would say
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
so as long as they are not as out spoken as you they’re fine?
There’s a reason for me doing this, can’t wait till you find it. ---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it." | |
| 07 Mar 2008 07:09 am |
Banned Rep: 51Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | Sean of the Living wrote:
ramuenmatt wrote:
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Ramuenmatt wrote:
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion.
^ That’s what I was trying to say...
Why the hell are you all so fussy about the exact term we use for something? If you can’t translate that into something you’re more comfortable with then change it to “Anything goes” “Survival of the fittest” or “Social Darwainism”
Just so you know, Social Darwinism is not affiliated with biological evolution.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”Last edited 07 Mar 2008 03:49 pm by ramunematt | |
| 07 Mar 2008 07:14 am |
Banned Rep: 51Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | Weasel 16 wrote:
1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
when have you not?
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Clearly no imagination, typical really.
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
would I be tolerant by continuing to do this to you? or would i be anoyoing?
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
Just what every dulled down bumble would say
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
so as long as they are not as out spoken as you they’re fine?
There’s a reason for me doing this, can’t wait till you find it.
1. Never. If you think otherwise then find a quote and link to prove it.
2. Well then would you be so kind as to explain it yourself?
3. Both
4. Dulled down bumble? This is reality. There will never be world peace if we continue to have so many differences.
5. So long as they don’t push their relgion on me is basically what I’m saying
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | |
| 07 Mar 2008 06:21 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 6Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3,602 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Weasel 16 wrote:
1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
when have you not?
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Clearly no imagination, typical really.
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
would I be tolerant by continuing to do this to you? or would i be anoyoing?
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
Just what every dulled down bumble would say
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
so as long as they are not as out spoken as you they’re fine?
There’s a reason for me doing this, can’t wait till you find it.
1. Never. If you think otherwise then find a quote and link to prove it.
2. Well then would you be so kind as to explain it yourself?
3. Both
4. Dulled down bumble? This is reality. There will never be world peace if we continue to have so many differences.
5. So long as they don’t push their relgion on me is basically what I’m saying
1. Go thing you went back and edited you posts no doubt
2. Anything mixes with dictatorship
3. Both? So I can continue with this totally irreverent live of questioning with you at every turn and I’m still being tolerant?
4. Just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it can’t be done!
5. But you can push yours all you want.
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it." | |
| 07 Mar 2008 11:09 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 25Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 2,026 ONLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Sean of the Living wrote:
ramuenmatt wrote:
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
Ramuenmatt wrote:
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion.
^ That’s what I was trying to say...
Why the hell are you all so fussy about the exact term we use for something? If you can’t translate that into something you’re more comfortable with then change it to “Anything goes” “Survival of the fittest” or “Social Darwainism”
Just so you know, Social Darwinism is not affiliated with biological evolution.
I’m speaking of people acting dog-eat-dog, is that clear enough or do you need me to get a fucking picture book for you?
| |
| 08 Mar 2008 01:29 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | 1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
— -> Yes you did... You said atheism is like free will.
Gplex also mention that... Killing is allowed in evolution
in order to survive
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
— -> Hmmm... You still dont know the concepts of free will that gplex mention to me...
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
— -> Do you tolerate theist since you said you belive in islam since you want fuck with 72 virgins...???
Is that tollerance for you...???
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
— -> Evolution make it worst...
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
— -> Then what atheist do to this world...???
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion.
— -> Matt stop being ignorant... proves please... ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 08 Mar 2008 01:34 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 1,404 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
1. When have I ever supported killing because of over population?
— -> Yes you did... You said atheism is like free will.
Gplex also mention that... Killing is allowed in evolution
in order to survive
WRONG. Gplex mentioned Natural selection...He NEVER mentioned killing to survive.
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
— -> Hmmm... You still dont know the concepts of free will that gplex mention to me...
concepts of free will? what would they be?
3. There is a difference between tolerance and acceptance. I can tolerate religion and criticize, even bash it at the same time.
— -> Do you tolerate theist since you said you belive in islam since you want fuck with 72 virgins...???
Is that tollerance for you...???
Yes. He does tolerate from what I see.
4. A “completely peaceful” world will never exist so long as we have our differences and weapons.
— -> Evolution make it worst...
So does blowing up 'infidels'
5. I could care less what people believe just as long as they don’t subvert science, try to influence the government/politics/freedoms/laws, try to impose their beliefs on me such as putting their god in my country’s pledge of allegiance or trying to teach a part of their religion in public schools as a scientific curriculum, among other things that organized religion, especially Christianity, has done that they really have no right in this country to do.
— -> Then what atheist do to this world...???
Many scientific discoveries probably.
6. Itachi, stop being ignorant. Rules and laws aren’t exclusive to religion.
— -> Matt stop being ignorant... proves please...
Are you an idiot. It’s blatently obvious. | |
| 08 Mar 2008 03:05 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | WRONG. Gplex mentioned Natural selection...He NEVER mentioned killing to survive.
2. A “Darwinist Anarchy”... what exactly does that mean? That evolution is anarchy? I’m not completely sure what your trying to say but I don’t see a “Darwinist Anarchy” as any different from a “Gravity Anarchy” or an “Atom Anarchy”
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
He said so... ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 08 Mar 2008 03:06 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 1,404 OFFLINE | I’m giving Gplex the benifit of the doubt and say he mentioned how the creatures adapted to the environment survive. | |
| 08 Mar 2008 03:09 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,508 OFFLINE | Killing others is natural selection... So by this point you accept killing for survive...??? ---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
|
|
Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Religion
» in a completely secular world
