I would realy wish that nintendo could make new legend of zealda games faster but really you could see the strain loz puts of nintendo. When ever there makeing loz they stop preety much ever other sector. They make very few first party games and of course the next one and all loz are great and they probebly were thinking about tp way befor the wii came out mabey even before the gamecube but if thers aprocemetly 4+ yeaers in between the last big consle loz and the next and even more work be for that you could only imagin on the next loz game thats comeing. I have expesuly herd of and argge with a hyrule in between tp dry land and ww flooded land
it would be much eser if this was 16 bit like(nes) or like the loz (GBA) then we would be able to make a other four swords it would be unlikely but if it were it most likly be on the ds
I watched that video, then I thought about Twilight Princess.
It almost demolishes the theory. I think I can agree (and I read the article they quoted from Nomura too) that Hyrule splits up. However, at the end of Twilight Princess, Gandondorf, for all intents and purposes, is dead.
Maybe.
Unless he’s not actually dead, but in stasis, much like in the end of Wind Waker. He did end with the Master Sword in him in both games, after all. So, I guess there’s still another chance at explaining all of this.
Eh, I guess there’s some waiting to do.
I personally don’t think of the overall storyline when I play, just the one at hand. They never really interconnect to the point that you’re required to play a prior game, or later game, to understand the plot.
In all actuality, Twilight is based some time after the events in Ocarina and Majora’s Mask. So for them to base a game after Majora’s Mask, it would probably have to be the Link in Twilight as a child for it to fit chronologically... maybe... But I’d assume that the next Zelda would be Twilight’s sequel, based out of Hyrule, like Majora’s Mask, and other games.
You guys do know of course that WW and TP take place in alternate realms, right?
The developers said so.
One takes place in a world where the sea has swallowed up Hyrule and Ganondorf became the ruler of the doomed realm.
One takes place in a world where Ganondorf was sentenced to death after OoT but, due to how the Goddesses liked to mess with the mortals, they transported him to the twilight realm instead.
There is no time in between WW and TP
I’m just worried they’re gonna make Legend of Zelda a First Person Game.
MontyAnaconda wrote:
You guys do know of course that WW and TP take place in alternate realms, right?
The developers said so.
One takes place in a world where the sea has swallowed up Hyrule and Ganondorf became the ruler of the doomed realm.
One takes place in a world where Ganondorf was sentenced to death after OoT but, due to how the Goddesses liked to mess with the mortals, they transported him to the twilight realm instead.
There is no time in between WW and TP
I’m just worried they’re gonna make Legend of Zelda a First Person Game.
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii: 2006, GCN: 2006)
This game takes place at least a hundred years after Ocarina of Time.[41] In an interview with Japan’s Nintendo Dream Magazine, Aonuma stated that Twilight Princess occurs in a “parallel” world to The Wind Waker, following an alternate timeline in which Ganondorf does not take over Hyrule, and is instead sentenced to execution following the conclusion of Ocarina of Time.[4]
»
Games
» The Next Legend of Zelda Game: Story Speculation
