does iron site need to be used like in call of duty 4 or is it just a new addition like gta iv’s cover system where the cover system doesn’t need to be used and just adds an extra layer of depth? does it revolve around the stupid iron sites?
because in call of duty 4 i got really annoyed with the iron sites because u cant circle around your enemy while shooting them. i only liked it in medal of honor because it was only used when you were hiding behind something so being stationary wasnt so bad.
can i run and gun in bad company and still be fine?
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
is that one of the perks? thats really gay. they should have just done away with iron sites. why waste a perk on something that shouldnt have been a problem in the first place?
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
of course there is strategy and you can stay in one area and set mines to take out all the tanks going through and do other things but the last game you could choose to just run and gun if you wanted to instead of doing more strategic stuff. thats what i liked about the game.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
BF: BC is less of a run-n-gun game than COD4 was imo. And if you want to hit your enemies accuratly and not die, then yes you’ll want to use your iron sights.
thats not what im saying. im saying is is it just as easily possible in that game to run around shooting people without using the iron sites? i want to know of it revolves around the iron sites like in call of duty or if it just an additional option.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
wtf. thats fucking gay. every game needs some stupid duck and cover mechanic or some stupid iron sites mechanic. im fine with having them in some games but why all of them? every game has to be the same fucking thing these days.
i need to get my hands on a demo. i hope it still feels like the past battlefield games.
i was thinking of trying to get more money if i could just to buy this game.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
does it feel more like battlefield or call of duty 4? because if i can get enough money before june i want to buy it. i just want another battlefield 2 except enhanced for next gen. i dont want to buy another call of duty 4. i beat that game, ranked up all the way and got bored of it.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
the21gamer wrote:
does it feel more like battlefield or call of duty 4? because if i can get enough money before june i want to buy it. i just want another battlefield 2 except enhanced for next gen. i dont want to buy another call of duty 4. i beat that game, ranked up all the way and got bored of it.
It’s totally different, just the destructibility it’s self makes it much different,
and not all guns use the iron sites even if the model has them on it.
Well... It’s a bit different, a few dumb gameplay changes have been made like no crouching, and it’s hard to tell where your being shot from, but overall its still epic.
»
Games
» battlefield bad company
