| 30 May 2008 10:10 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 28  Joined: 06 May 2008 Posts: 1,432 OFFLINE | strong wrote:
refute it then. Show me some proof instead of claiming its wrong.
Twat.
The thing is, you are assuming that “god” is a default answer if we have not yet discovered proof of an alternative. We have been studying for some time now possible causes of the “Big Bang” that do not require a god. I suggest you look into “String” and “M” Theory. Of course, none of these theories have proof per say, but they are mathematically close (still not perfect though).
Did you know that before telescopes and astronomy (not astrology) people considered “God” to a be a real physical being watching over the Earth living in the sky, like the roman gods. However, after we looked around the sky and found nothing in the advancement of new technology, it was determined that God must live in a different form of existence (spiritual). This allowed the people to continue believing, even in the face of new discovery. ---
 | |
|
| 30 May 2008 10:10 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right? --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:11 pm |
strong Guest | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
I thougt strong was smart I’m proven wrong.
And you know whats really crazy? There is no winning against a theist. They are to damn stubborn.
ironically, i could say the exact same about you. We have different ideas, yet you have not shown anything that is reasonable.
ill say it slowly this time. God is om-ni-po-tent he is above physics, as he is above everything. He does not need to be composed of matter, or obey time. He does not need to be anything humans can understand | |
| 30 May 2008 10:11 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:12 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | I like my friends theory better it involves strings  --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:14 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | strong wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
I thougt strong was smart I’m proven wrong.
And you know whats really crazy? There is no winning against a theist. They are to damn stubborn.
ironically, i could say the exact same about you. We have different ideas, yet you have not shown anything that is reasonable.
ill say it slowly this time. God is om-ni-po-tent he is above physics, as he is above everything. He does not need to be composed of matter, or obey time. He does not need to be anything humans can understand
PROVE IT. Or else, I can just make up some bullshit to. The magical hamster is above everything, even all the gods of every religion put together. He does not follow gods laws because if god disobeys him he sends him to hell.
Now, I just made up something above all powerful. Logically by what your saying, It’s possible because the magical hamster does not need to follow logic or reason thus he>>>>>>>>>>>>>x infinity infinity times omnipotent. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:15 pm |
strong Guest | you still cannot refute causality. As i said everything has a cause. the creation of causality must be beyond science and physics. even if the beginning is not the big bang. | |
| 30 May 2008 10:15 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | strong wrote:
you still cannot refute causality. As i said everything has a cause. the creation of causality must be beyond science and physics. even if the beginning is not the big bang.
So because of this, God is true? That makes no sence. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:15 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose.
So hypothetically their is a certain amount of energy in the universe(and others if their are any)? --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:16 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose.
So hypothetically their is a certain amount of energy in the universe(and others if their are any)?
Yes, the universe is finite technically so energy is finite. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:20 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose.
So hypothetically their is a certain amount of energy in the universe(and others if their are any)?
Yes, the universe is finite technically so energy is finite.
So their a certain amount of everything in the universe there can only be so much of one thing and still exist right? --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:20 pm |
strong Guest | thats also my point. Faith does not require proof. We do not need to prove the existance of God, as i mentioned at the top. And are you still having a hard time understanding omnipotence? Because it seems that you are bullshitting without understanding my point. Omnipotence > everything, physics included. attempt to refute that point again and my respect for you will drop. | |
| 30 May 2008 10:22 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose.
So hypothetically their is a certain amount of energy in the universe(and others if their are any)?
Yes, the universe is finite technically so energy is finite.
So their a certain amount of everything in the universe there can only be so much of one thing and still exist right?
Yes. Think of the universe as a poptart box. There can only be so many poptarts in the box without overflowing. Thus space in a poptart box=finite. Same for the universe and energy and stuff. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:22 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Omnipotence is just another word for infinity. --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:23 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Created nor destroyed but can be controlled right?
I suppose.
So hypothetically their is a certain amount of energy in the universe(and others if their are any)?
Yes, the universe is finite technically so energy is finite.
So their a certain amount of everything in the universe there can only be so much of one thing and still exist right?
Yes. Think of the universe as a poptart box. There can only be so many poptarts in the box without overflowing. Thus space in a poptart box=finite. Same for the universe and energy and stuff.
I know that already (damn you science channel!) --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:23 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | 1indainfinite wrote:
Omnipotence is just another word for infinity.
infinity is just a concept it’s not a real number. COunt to infinity squaring the numbers starting from
9 trillion googleplexes. Square the numbers you get until you get to infinity. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:24 pm |
strong Guest | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
strong wrote:
you still cannot refute causality. As i said everything has a cause. the creation of causality must be beyond science and physics. even if the beginning is not the big bang.
So because of this, God is true? That makes no sence.
ffs NO i was stating that there is a possibility that there is a God, and that there is proof as such. Gods sake  just because someone posts something that disagrees with you theres no need to be a prick | |
| 30 May 2008 10:28 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63  Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | strong wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
strong wrote:
you still cannot refute causality. As i said everything has a cause. the creation of causality must be beyond science and physics. even if the beginning is not the big bang.
So because of this, God is true? That makes no sence.
ffs NO i was stating that there is a possibility that there is a God, and that there is proof as such. Gods sake  just because someone posts something that disagrees with you theres no need to be a prick
I apologize, I got in to a bit of a fight and such with a couple people at school.
Anyways, yes there is a possiblity that a diety exists. But heres the problem, you can’t just ASSUME it is YOUR god. Why does it have to be your god? Why can’t it be some goddess named Sherry, or a half lion half flamingo, or Allah? You cannot deny that those are possiblities either. ---
 | |
| 30 May 2008 10:44 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40  Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
1indainfinite wrote:
Omnipotence is just another word for infinity.
infinity is just a concept it’s not a real number. COunt to infinity squaring the numbers starting from
9 trillion googleplexes. Square the numbers you get until you get to infinity.
I hail from ten years of your future can I stop now? --- Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 10:47 pm |
strong Guest | we dont deny them (were not supposed too anyway) but God is most likely entirely beyond our understanding. We know that he is benevolent, and believe that he has revealed some of his nature to us, but a lot of the prophets could be described as... dodgy. Christians should include other religions in their thoughts, as we believe that all religions show aspects of him. The exception is Satanism i suppose, but thats downright wierd | |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |