Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Haha
When we all get our Gears 2 and enjoy the ever living fuck out of it, saying how righteous it is, I’m sure you’ll sit there bitching about gears 1 still. Hahaha
And I’m sure a pedo will still be roaming the forums.
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Haha
When we all get our Gears 2 and enjoy the ever living fuck out of it, saying how righteous it is, I’m sure you’ll sit there bitching about gears 1 still. Hahaha
If your 360 doesn’t red ring again the day before it’s release,
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Fuck that! Gears of War is what GRAWs controls should have been. I love GRAW 1 and 2 but I’d say this to my death that Gears of War is what GRAWs controls should have been. GRAW has the clunkiest, slow reacting controls I’ve ever played in a shooter.
---
Dante666 wrote:
If Xtrm ever left this site it would leave a huge gaping hole in it...keep up the good work dude!
Last edited 11 May 2008 08:18 pm by Xtrm Liability
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Then what’s the point in having a shotgun when you turn the corner or enter a room and the controls fuck up?
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Then what’s the point in having a shotgun when you turn the corner or enter a room and the controls fuck up?
DEDEDE
Actually the point of it was incase the locust rushed you... DEDEDE
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Then what’s the point in having a shotgun when you turn the corner or enter a room and the controls fuck up?
DEDEDE
Actually the point of it was incase the locust rushed you... DEDEDE
Then was the main weapon work just as well? DEDEDE
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Then what’s the point in having a shotgun when you turn the corner or enter a room and the controls fuck up?
DEDEDE
Actually the point of it was incase the locust rushed you... DEDEDE
Then was the main weapon work just as well? DEDEDE
Your phrase didn’t make any sense... re word it...
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Well maybe it was bad for running and gunning because when you go past the casual difficulty setting it was all about using cover... Hmmm DEDEDE
Then tell me why in Rainbow Six, a game with a better duck and cover system that was all about using cover, didn’t have control issues when it came to running and gunning.
Oh, and I was talking about controls and not difficulty... Hmmm
DEDEDE
Because it was designed to use both, where as gears, was designed to force the player to use cover,
And you said the controls were bad for running and gunning, which the game wasn’t even about... DEDEDE
Then what’s the point in having a shotgun when you turn the corner or enter a room and the controls fuck up?
DEDEDE
Actually the point of it was incase the locust rushed you... DEDEDE
Then why was the main weapon work just as well? DEDEDE
Your phrase didn’t make any sense... re word it...
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Haha
When we all get our Gears 2 and enjoy the ever living fuck out of it, saying how righteous it is, I’m sure you’ll sit there bitching about gears 1 still. Hahaha
And I’m sure a pedo will still be roaming the forums.
If you’re trying to imply I’m a pedo, you’re highly mistaken. Shit, I’m the only one around here that gets pussy from a woman above 25 years of age. I’d love to see you call me a pedo to my face, though. I’d be willing to knock the lights out of a lippy lil' shit in his teens and pay a couple hundred dollar fine to teach his ass a lesson.
---
Dante666 wrote:
If Xtrm ever left this site it would leave a huge gaping hole in it...keep up the good work dude!
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Haha
When we all get our Gears 2 and enjoy the ever living fuck out of it, saying how righteous it is, I’m sure you’ll sit there bitching about gears 1 still. Hahaha
And I’m sure a pedo will still be roaming the forums.
If you’re trying to imply I’m a pedo, you’re highly mistaken. Shit, I’m the only one around here that gets pussy from a woman above 25 years of age. I’d love to see you call me a pedo to my face, though. I’d be willing to knock the lights out of a lippy lil' shit in his teens and pay a couple hundred dollar fine to teach his ass a lesson.
Then you would be disappointed because I’m past my teens. “Oh, Xtrm are my daddy?" Hahahaha! Obsessed with little teenage girls Xtrm? Hhhmmmm? And you’re what? 30? And you’re balding. I detect a pedo.
Online Predator wrote:
lol They won’t kill MGS4. MGS4 has too much over it and is way too big. But they could 'kill' Resistance 2.
The game looks like crap though. The technical part is amazing but after playing the first game I don’t see any of their additions fixing the gameplay. Why can’t I shoot when I run?! Having to be against a wall or behind cover in order to get your bullets to hit was retarded. I remember all the times when 2 or more people would be in the open right by each other and running around trying hit each other. The controls really made it difficult, goofy, and annoying.
In reference to the highlighted section in the above statement... What game were you playing because I know it wasn’t GoW on the 360. I have played that game for nearly 2 yrs now and I have never had any trouble firing while I’m running, nor have I had to be “in cover” to get my bullets to connect with my targets.
It most certainly was Gears of War. I’ll tell you a secret. You never had problems because you’re a nerd. Nerds never have problems with games they like. That was 1 Gears of Wars bigger flaws. It had funky controls when it came to running and gunning.
Haha
The controls were a little strange at first, but once you got hang of it, they were actually very innovative 3rd Person Shooter controls which were in fact very innovative for the genre.
I’m not talking about the overall the controls.
I’m talking about the controls when it came to running and gunning. That part was far from innovative. In fact, it was dinoshit. Except the chainsaw. That was the best part.
The controls were fine but not 'innovative'. 007 and Rainbow Six did it before Gears of War or better.
Haha
When we all get our Gears 2 and enjoy the ever living fuck out of it, saying how righteous it is, I’m sure you’ll sit there bitching about gears 1 still. Hahaha
And I’m sure a pedo will still be roaming the forums.
If you’re trying to imply I’m a pedo, you’re highly mistaken. Shit, I’m the only one around here that gets pussy from a woman above 25 years of age. I’d love to see you call me a pedo to my face, though. I’d be willing to knock the lights out of a lippy lil' shit in his teens and pay a couple hundred dollar fine to teach his ass a lesson.
Then you would be disappointed because I’m past my teens. “Oh, Xtrm are my daddy?" Hahahaha! Obsessed with little teenage girls Xtrm? Hhhmmmm? And you’re what? 30? And you’re balding. I detect a pedo.
Actually I’m 29 and 20 year old hotties still think I’m cute. Soo, basically if you’re ever not nerdy enough to go the a club, That chick you want would want me over you. But I’d have to turn her down because I have a woman... a very jealous woman at that. Besides the point, Gears 2 kills anything on PS3 and I win.
---
Dante666 wrote:
If Xtrm ever left this site it would leave a huge gaping hole in it...keep up the good work dude!
What chick I want? Are you pulling this out of your ass?
That and a baldy getting any real chicks. lol
There is difference between a 29 year old doing shit like that with 20 year olds and a 29 year old doing that crap with teenagers on the internet.
No, I don’t care about PS3 vs 360. I just like to stir things up a bit.
Online Predator wrote:
What chick I want? Are you pulling this out of your ass?
That and a baldy getting any real chicks. lol
There is difference between a 29 year old doing shit like that with 20 year olds and a 29 year old doing that crap with teenagers on the internet.
No, I don’t care about PS3 vs 360. I just like to stir things up a bit.
Okay, go to N4G.com and chat on there. The adult gamers are the majority on that site (but they’re mostly nerds and 40 year old PS3 Fans). Dude, If I want to play a game every once in awhile at my age, then I will. That does’nt make me a nerd. But that has nothing to do with the fact that Gears 2 blows MGS, RE2 and KZ2 out of the water which are both facts.
---
Dante666 wrote:
If Xtrm ever left this site it would leave a huge gaping hole in it...keep up the good work dude!
Online Predator wrote:
What chick I want? Are you pulling this out of your ass?
That and a baldy getting any real chicks. lol
There is difference between a 29 year old doing shit like that with 20 year olds and a 29 year old doing that crap with teenagers on the internet.
No, I don’t care about PS3 vs 360. I just like to stir things up a bit.
Okay, go to N4G.com and chat on there. The adult gamers are the majority on that site (but they’re mostly nerds and 40 year old PS3 Fans). Dude, If I want to play a game every once in awhile at my age, then I will. That does’nt make me a nerd. But that has nothing to do with the fact that Gears 2 blows MGS, RE2 and KZ2 out of the water which are both facts.
I never said you were a nerd. I’m not interested in MGS4. Gears will probably blow Resistance and RE2 out of the water but it is highly unlikely that it will blow MGS4 out of the water. I’m not a fan of MGS4 and I know this. It’s just not going to happen.
Online Predator wrote:
What chick I want? Are you pulling this out of your ass?
That and a baldy getting any real chicks. lol
There is difference between a 29 year old doing shit like that with 20 year olds and a 29 year old doing that crap with teenagers on the internet.
No, I don’t care about PS3 vs 360. I just like to stir things up a bit.
Okay, go to N4G.com and chat on there. The adult gamers are the majority on that site (but they’re mostly nerds and 40 year old PS3 Fans). Dude, If I want to play a game every once in awhile at my age, then I will. That does’nt make me a nerd. But that has nothing to do with the fact that Gears 2 blows MGS, RE2 and KZ2 out of the water which are both facts.
I never said you were a nerd. I’m not interested in MGS4. Gears will probably blow Resistance and RE2 out of the water but it is highly unlikely that it will blow MGS4 out of the water. I’m not a fan of MGS4 and I know this. It’s just not going to happen.
I think it will mainly because even Kojima is disappointed with the final product of MGS4... and that’s sad
true, but shouldn’t he be happy with the majority of it though?
I know it will be a great game, but how good is it gonna be if he’s not very thrilled about it?
»
Games
» Gears 2 First Gameplay Footage
