the21gamer wrote:
Atheism deserves as much respect as religion as it is a belief. Why does he need to give anymore reason than that?
i respect atheism
but if your a atheist jackass who cant keep to themselves i have a problem
same with atheist’s having problems with religeos jackass’s
X + -X = -X + X
A belief that God does not exist
A disbelief that God exists
All you’re doing is moving the negative notation. It’s the same thing.
Most times where you can say that you disbelieve in something, you can say you believe in the opposite.
Besides, Ram, didn’t I show you that dictionary definition already?
the21gamer wrote:
Atheism deserves as much respect as religion as it is a belief. Why does he need to give anymore reason than that?
Because atheism is NOT a belief. It is a disbelief. Honestly, you should understand this by now. A lack of X does not equal X. It’s simple logic.
It’s a belief that God does not exist. Fact.
Again you can not say just god, you need to specifiy what you mean....
Atheism is the absence of belief in deities. So a baby is a atheist, because he doesnt know about any deities, you could make up any god you want and not tell anyone and they would also be atheistic towards your new god... etc etc...
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena.
ramunematt wrote:
A lack of X is not X. Fact. Argue with that, and your legally retarded.
Can you stop calling people retarded and/or insane? You sound quite dogmatic... “Argue with me and you’re insane” it’s basically what you said on the solopist thread even though you didn’t understand it and it’s what you’re saying here, even though you don’t understand what’s being said here either. Read what Tyreaus has written.
ramunematt wrote:
A lack of X is not X. Fact. Argue with that, and your legally retarded.
Can you stop calling people retarded and/or insane? You sound quite dogmatic... “Argue with me and you’re insane” it’s basically what you said on the solopist thread even though you didn’t understand it and it’s what you’re saying here, even though you don’t understand what’s being said here either. Read what Tyreaus has written.
However, that little example he gave is right. If you have a lack of apples, you have no apples. If you argue that you have apples and you don’t then...I don’t know if your legally retarded but..
I get what you mean anyway, A disbelif is just a belief with a prefix attatched to it. I think that is what everyone was trying to say.
ramunematt wrote:
A lack of X is not X. Fact. Argue with that, and your legally retarded.
Can you stop calling people retarded and/or insane? You sound quite dogmatic... “Argue with me and you’re insane” it’s basically what you said on the solopist thread even though you didn’t understand it and it’s what you’re saying here, even though you don’t understand what’s being said here either. Read what Tyreaus has written.
However, that little example he gave is right. If you have a lack of apples, you have no apples. If you argue that you have apples and you don’t then...I don’t know if your legally retarded but..
I get what you mean anyway, A disbelif is just a belief with a prefix attatched to it. I think that is what everyone was trying to say.
It’s not “just a prefix”. A prefix can totally reverse a word’s meaning. However, I did NOT say lack of X equals X, read what Tyreaus wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
X + -X = -X + X
A belief that God does not exist
A disbelief that God exists
All you’re doing is moving the negative notation. It’s the same thing.
Most times where you can say that you disbelieve in something, you can say you believe in the opposite.
Besides, Ram, didn’t I show you that dictionary definition already?
Last edited 16 May 2008 09:55 pm by Sean of the Living
Tyreaus wrote:
X + -X = -X + X
A belief that God does not exist
A disbelief that God exists
All you’re doing is moving the negative notation. It’s the same thing.
Most times where you can say that you disbelieve in something, you can say you believe in the opposite.
Besides, Ram, didn’t I show you that dictionary definition already?
Hmmm... seems to be right here... right mod...???
---
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster —
Tyreaus wrote:
X + -X = -X + X
A belief that God does not exist
A disbelief that God exists
All you’re doing is moving the negative notation. It’s the same thing.
Most times where you can say that you disbelieve in something, you can say you believe in the opposite.
Besides, Ram, didn’t I show you that dictionary definition already?
Actually X + -X = -X, and vice versa. Its just a prefix, but that prefix can change the meaning. If you go beyond the barrier of language (that includes the dictionary) you know they mean similar things, but in the end -X + X and X + -X will still add up to -X.
--- BASED ON ACTUAL INTERVIEW
Sarah Palin wrote:
Interviewer wrote:
So what kind of magazines do you read?
ramunematt wrote:
A lack of X is not X. Fact. Argue with that, and your legally retarded.
Can you stop calling people retarded and/or insane? You sound quite dogmatic... “Argue with me and you’re insane” it’s basically what you said on the solopist thread even though you didn’t understand it and it’s what you’re saying here, even though you don’t understand what’s being said here either. Read what Tyreaus has written.
I’m not calling people retarded because they are disagreeing with me. I’m calling them retarded because they don’t know simple logic. A lack of hair is not hair, a lack of apples are not apples, a lack of reasoning is not reasoning, so why do they think a lack of belief is still belief? What do people who are arguing against me about this have to gain that they feel they have to violate this logic?
I apologize for offending anyone by calling them retarded, but this isn’t rocket science.
--- BASED ON ACTUAL INTERVIEW
Sarah Palin wrote:
Interviewer wrote:
So what kind of magazines do you read?
»
Religion
» Gplex is gone
