rather than “sinking to his level”, why don’t you just ask him why religion bothers him so much. If you are nice enough about it, he may actually tell you.
There are many personal reasons of my own that cause me to have a grudge against religion. I imagine it may be the same for Gplex. If you care at all...
Khorib wrote:
rather than “sinking to his level”, why don’t you just ask him why religion bothers him so much. If you are nice enough about it, he may actually tell you.
There are many personal reasons of my own that cause me to have a grudge against religion. I imagine it may be the same for Gplex. If you care at all...
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
Khorib wrote:
rather than “sinking to his level”, why don’t you just ask him why religion bothers him so much. If you are nice enough about it, he may actually tell you.
There are many personal reasons of my own that cause me to have a grudge against religion. I imagine it may be the same for Gplex. If you care at all...
It’s been done before. I’m not bother. I don’t care if people give him shit or not. he deserves it anyways.
You, I can understand why you would have a problem with religion but you don’t act like Gplex and you’re respectful about it.
I’m an atheist and believe in atheism and making fun of it all. If he can’t take it that’s his problem. No reason for us to all get butthurt.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
--- I’m watching you...
Last edited 14 May 2008 03:06 pm by Online Predator
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
No, there is no evidence for or against the existance of God. I don’t believe in God but I can at least admit that. It’s all belief.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
No, there is no evidence for or against the existance of God. I don’t believe in God but I can at least admit that. It’s all belief.
So your saying that some of the evidences we have don’t sometimes contridict the bible? or some religious text?
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
No, there is no evidence for or against the existance of God. I don’t believe in God but I can at least admit that. It’s all belief.
So your saying that some of the evidences we have don’t sometimes contridict the bible? or some religious text?
It contracts the Bible but contradicting the Bible does not prove whether or not God exists. It just proves the Bible was written by man and man’s beliefs ABOUT God or what happened are wrong or at least partially wrong. There is a BIG difference between the two.
Don’t assume that proving the Bible has flaws means that you just proved God does not exist. It just proves that the Bible is not perfect or always right.
I am emphasizing again that I DO NOT believe in God.
Just throwing this in even though its completely off topic, the Bible was actually re-written several times throughout history and it changed each time it was re-written. A main contributor to changing the Bible was the Catholic Church back between the Dark Ages to the late Medieval Ages.
Demon Slayer wrote:
Just throwing this in even though its completely off topic, the Bible was actually re-written several times throughout history and it changed each time it was re-written. A main contributor to changing the Bible was the Catholic Church back between the Dark Ages to the late Medieval Ages.
Who told you to learn!!!!
--- God is evil God is pure God is neither God is God
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
No, there is no evidence for or against the existance of God. I don’t believe in God but I can at least admit that. It’s all belief.
So your saying that some of the evidences we have don’t sometimes contridict the bible? or some religious text?
It contracts the Bible but contradicting the Bible does not prove whether or not God exists. It just proves the Bible was written by man and man’s beliefs ABOUT God or what happened are wrong or at least partially wrong. There is a BIG difference between the two.
Don’t assume that proving the Bible has flaws means that you just proved God does not exist. It just proves that the Bible is not perfect or always right.
I am emphasizing again that I DO NOT believe in God.
I never said it disproves god. Just it can condridict the words of a supposed 'perfect' god.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
I have seen Gplex overeact before, but telling him to “Shut the fuck up” or try any censoring or cuss him, it’s just going to make it worse. Of course, ignorance works just the same with him as cussing him.
Which is understandable. Think of this. If you were arguing with someone and you brought up hard evidence to back yourself up and then the person you are arguing with just says “Thats not true” or “Thats not evidence” or something along those lines, your going to get pissed off.
lol We can’t censor him. Only the mods can.
No, Gplex has never showed any RELEVANT 'evidence'
Evolution for example, that’s not proof there is no God.
And your point? Who said he was trying to disprove god?
Why don’t you go read through the topics yourself. There have been topics where he tried to disprove God through irrelevant 'evidence'.
The point is if he shows irrelevant evidence that has nothing to do with what’s being argued then obviously people are going to say that it’s not proof. It’s his fault, not theirs.
ah but there is SOME evidences that disprove or make one god from a religion kinda false.
No, there is no evidence for or against the existance of God. I don’t believe in God but I can at least admit that. It’s all belief.
So your saying that some of the evidences we have don’t sometimes contridict the bible? or some religious text?
It contracts the Bible but contradicting the Bible does not prove whether or not God exists. It just proves the Bible was written by man and man’s beliefs ABOUT God or what happened are wrong or at least partially wrong. There is a BIG difference between the two.
Don’t assume that proving the Bible has flaws means that you just proved God does not exist. It just proves that the Bible is not perfect or always right.
I am emphasizing again that I DO NOT believe in God.
I never said it disproves god. Just it can condridict the words of a supposed 'perfect' god.
Then why were you arguing? I never did say it didn’t contradict the words of “God”.
»
Religion
» What Is With All The Hate Towards GPlex????
First 
