| 28 May 2008 12:40 am |
|
|
| 28 May 2008 01:16 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55  Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,017 OFFLINE | ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahaha... soz couldnt help it... ---
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 29 May 2008 07:55 am |
The Mangekyou Sharingan Rep: 50 Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 10,520 OFFLINE | Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it... ---
 
“Great new ideas usually come from very small teams... don’t give up so easily." — John Kaster — | |
| 29 May 2008 08:45 am |
FUCK SUPRA Rep: 72 Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 16,788 OFFLINE | this is stupid ---
I’ll smack a bitch | |
| 29 May 2008 02:44 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63 Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it...
It refuted itself and even if the skeleton was real it would prove evolution
 | |
| 29 May 2008 02:46 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40 Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Hell if fairies were real it prove evolution. ---
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 04:54 pm |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,017 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it...
It refuted itself and even if the skeleton was real it would prove evolution
I dont know about that....
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
| 30 May 2008 05:08 pm |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it...
It refuted itself and even if the skeleton was real it would prove evolution
I dont know about that....
If giants existed and now they don’t doesn’t that signal natural selection at work?
| |
| 30 May 2008 06:32 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | 
OYG I found a shiba!
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 07:33 pm |
strong Guest | Evolution dusnt disprove God nyways. Science isnt opposed to religion, anymore than its opposed to athiesm. Science is a neutral factor, and a huge % of christians are non-creationist nyway. When u consider most of the old testament is metaphor, (e.g book of Job; all of life is a test of goodness, and noahs ark; God made things extinct (like the dinasours) so that humans could arise, and he promises not to make us extinct) genesis makes far more sense | |
| 30 May 2008 07:47 pm |
In the infinite Rep: 40Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 10,817 OFFLINE | Holy shit a guy with an education (Will MvC ever be the same find out soon Saturday at 9 am) ---
Don’t FUCK with my insanity I’ll warp your REALiTY | |
| 30 May 2008 09:00 pm |
Regular Rep: 7Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 416 OFFLINE | Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it...
You know, if you just admitted your mistake instead of lashing out at people, then you wouldn’t look so stupid. :/ | |
| 30 May 2008 09:00 pm |
Regular Rep: 7Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 416 OFFLINE | Edit: Whoops, the computer glitched and I double posted. Last edited 30 May 2008 09:01 pm by Agung | |
| 30 May 2008 09:12 pm |
strong Guest | w8 a minite, people were sayin b4 that this guy was gplex in disguise. If so, might this be deliberately to show up theists? | |
| 30 May 2008 09:17 pm |
Regular Rep: 7Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 416 OFFLINE | I don’t believe Gplex is Itachi in disguise. For one thing, his spelling is certainly better than Itachi’s though, even though English is probably Itachi’s second language. | |
| 31 May 2008 01:01 pm |
Entree Rep: 3 Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 8 OFFLINE | We can’t go around changing the definition of words simply to pacify superstitious fears. If we consider god as defined in the Big Three: Christianity, judaism, and Islam (and their respective off-shoots) then evolution does disprove the existence of god. If you believe that man and man alone has a soul, as the Big Three says, and you believe in evolution, then at what point does an animal gain a soul? Does god wait until they reach a certain moral authority? Or did He build us with some kind of soul-switch that kicks in once we begin to feel guilt for our “sins”? If, however, you believe in say Hinduism or buddhism then there’s room for evolution, but really those belief systems see “god” as an archetype, not as a consciousness concerned with judging our actions. Which is really a figurative interpretation, and hence disproves His existence anyway. | |
| 31 May 2008 08:15 pm |
strong Guest | BTMN wrote:
We can’t go around changing the definition of words simply to pacify superstitious fears. If we consider god as defined in the Big Three: Christianity, judaism, and Islam (and their respective off-shoots) then evolution does disprove the existence of god. If you believe that man and man alone has a soul, as the Big Three says, and you believe in evolution, then at what point does an animal gain a soul? Does god wait until they reach a certain moral authority? Or did He build us with some kind of soul-switch that kicks in once we begin to feel guilt for our “sins”? If, however, you believe in say Hinduism or buddhism then there’s room for evolution, but really those belief systems see “god” as an archetype, not as a consciousness concerned with judging our actions. Which is really a figurative interpretation, and hence disproves His existence anyway.
All animals have their own souls, but only humans at the moment are self aware, knowing right from wrong.(This is what the garden of Eden is a metaphor for btw, humanities change from the blissful ignorance of animals into good and evil. ) If a chimpanzee evolved so that it knew right from wrong, it would be capable of sin, and so it could go to hell (but only for deliberate and knowing murder, and without regret) | |
| 31 May 2008 09:28 pm |
Banned Rep: 51 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,808 OFFLINE | Chimps DO know whats right from wrong. In the 60’s there was an experiment that tested a chimpanzee’s morals. The chimp was hungry and there was a piece of food in front of it. However, they made it so that the chimp knew if it took the food then another chimp would get an electric shock. The chimp didn’t take the food. This has been done with other animals too.
BTW animals have also been seen to have their own culture and perform rituals. Humans and animals are not as different as you may think.
Also, what makes you think an animal can sin? Animals didn’t come from Adam and Eve, so they wouldn’t be able to inherit or know about sin. ---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”Last edited 31 May 2008 09:29 pm by ramunematt | |
| 31 May 2008 11:07 pm |
strong Guest | ramunematt wrote:
Chimps DO know whats right from wrong. In the 60’s there was an experiment that tested a chimpanzee’s morals. The chimp was hungry and there was a piece of food in front of it. However, they made it so that the chimp knew if it took the food then another chimp would get an electric shock. The chimp didn’t take the food. This has been done with other animals too.
BTW animals have also been seen to have their own culture and perform rituals. Humans and animals are not as different as you may think.
Also, what makes you think an animal can sin? Animals didn’t come from Adam and Eve, so they wouldn’t be able to inherit or know about sin.
ive said it before and ill say it again
dont assume all christians are creationist. | |
| 01 Jun 2008 03:30 am |
Addict (beyond 1337) Rep: 55Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 5,017 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Gplex wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Itachi Uchiha wrote:
Hahahaha... LOL...
Just like I said to you...
refute it...
It refuted itself and even if the skeleton was real it would prove evolution
I dont know about that....
If giants existed and now they don’t doesn’t that signal natural selection at work?
their would have to be a slow change in them over many generations, mostly because the heart would have to be completly diffrent in order for a giant human being to exist.
Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. | |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Religion
» Evolution againts the GOD...
