| 19 Jun 2008 02:15 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 33  Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 4,794 OFFLINE | does anybody know? ---
  | |
|
| 19 Jun 2008 02:16 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 26 Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 3,105 OFFLINE | The speed of light. <.< ---
1outofDAinfinite wrote:
Everyday I think people can’t get any more stupid everyday I’m proven wrong.
 | |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:17 am |
Thanatos, God of Death Rep: 63 Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 14,451 OFFLINE | The Dahaka wrote:
The speed of light. <.<
we really can’t see the light particles moving though. We can see the light but
 | |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:19 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 33Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 4,794 OFFLINE | but what speed in particular such as the human eye cant see stuff moving faster than sound or something? ---
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:19 am |
Scriptor of Alacritas Rep: 63 Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 17,101 OFFLINE | 60fps? 
It Puts the Lotion on It’s Skin or Else it Gets the Hose Again...
 | |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:20 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 26Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 3,105 OFFLINE | ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
The Dahaka wrote:
The speed of light. <.<
we really can’t see the light particles moving though. We can see the light but
I see light. <.<
1outofDAinfinite wrote:
Everyday I think people can’t get any more stupid everyday I’m proven wrong.
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:30 am |
SpeedofSound Guest | It depends on the size, color of the object, and how far away you are from it really. But you can clearly see a Nascar Stock car and they travel at speeds close to 200 mph. A fighter jet, which can break the sound barrier can be seen easily.
I’d honestly put a rough estimate of around 1000 mph for a man sized object, if it doesn’t stick out like a sore thumb. For something wearing bright red clothing against a dark background, it’d be a lot easier to track it’s movements than if it was wearing black against the dark background.
So it’s relative. But I’d put an average at 1000 mph.
You could probably come up with a more solid number though, but using the maximum frame rate in which the mind processing images. And that’s around 100 fps. | |
| 19 Jun 2008 02:31 am |
FUCK SUPRA Rep: 72 Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 16,788 OFFLINE | The Dahaka wrote:
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
The Dahaka wrote:
The speed of light. <.<
we really can’t see the light particles moving though. We can see the light but
I see light. <.<
lol
I’ll smack a bitch | |
| 19 Jun 2008 03:42 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 33Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 4,794 OFFLINE | SpeedofSound wrote:
It depends on the size, color of the object, and how far away you are from it really. But you can clearly see a Nascar Stock car and they travel at speeds close to 200 mph. A fighter jet, which can break the sound barrier can be seen easily.
I’d honestly put a rough estimate of around 1000 mph for a man sized object, if it doesn’t stick out like a sore thumb. For something wearing bright red clothing against a dark background, it’d be a lot easier to track it’s movements than if it was wearing black against the dark background.
So it’s relative. But I’d put an average at 1000 mph.
You could probably come up with a more solid number though, but using the maximum frame rate in which the mind processing images. And that’s around 100 fps.
thanks nice answer
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 04:46 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44 Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | Christian Gold Saint of Aries wrote:
does anybody know?
over 200 fps
 | |
| 19 Jun 2008 04:53 pm |
FUCK SUPRA Rep: 72Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 16,788 OFFLINE | the speed of love and the speed of pain ---
I’ll smack a bitch | |
| 19 Jun 2008 05:08 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54 Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,095 OFFLINE | 24 fps ---
 
  | |
| 19 Jun 2008 05:09 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
24 fps
wow retard alert
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 05:42 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,095 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
Zucas wrote:
24 fps
wow retard alert
Well from what I know its about 24 frames per second. After that speed you don’t clearly see every frame. You’ll see bits of every frame but not every frame indeed. You can visibly see 200 FPS, as you said, but you see blurs. About 24 FPS is fastest speed the human eye will see without not seeing every frame which we see as a blur.
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 06:10 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 33Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 4,794 OFFLINE | wow thanks you guys ---
| |
| 19 Jun 2008 07:09 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
Zucas wrote:
24 fps
wow retard alert
Well from what I know its about 24 frames per second. After that speed you don’t clearly see every frame. You’ll see bits of every frame but not every frame indeed. You can visibly see 200 FPS, as you said, but you see blurs. About 24 FPS is fastest speed the human eye will see without not seeing every frame which we see as a blur.
Yes Blurs is what makes everything go sooo smooth...If you have ever seen a hi def video at 60 fps it looks like its stuttering but its not it just that it doesnt have blur which makes it look a lot slower...but the human eye can see the big diff between 60 fps and 30 fps
Last edited 19 Jun 2008 07:10 pm by Di5turbed | |
| 19 Jun 2008 07:36 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,095 OFFLINE | I know it has to be adjusted for the human eye to see it “clearly” per se. I mean have you ever wondered why you play a game at 60 FPS for long periods of times your eyes start to hurt. One reason is lack of blinking. But another reason is the eye’s inability to read all 60 frames in a second, causing kind of an overload. Thus it strains them to view it causing irritation and pain. Same reason why you get headaches from playing them as it overloads the brain. And the same reason why there are seizure warnings for video games. ---
| |
| 22 Jul 2008 11:11 pm |
pokerrace Guest | Christian Gold Saint of Aries wrote:
but what speed in particular such as the human eye cant see stuff moving faster than sound or something?
It depends on how far away it is. I could easily see a planet moving through the sky at several times the speed of sound without it seeming like it was moving at all, but I couldn’t make out a bullet whizzing past my face at mach 1.
Speed is entirely relative and perceived speed is relative to how far away something is from the observer. | |
|
|
Post Reply |
First ]
»
Off-Topic
» whats the fastest speed the human eye can see?
