Cid Highwind wrote:
What happened, OP was calling you a pedophile, Xtrm. Because of the whole cleavage contest and you sometimes making sexual contents to some of the younger women. At the same time, he and I were discussing SanjayNethos and how he requested a nude picture of a young girl on the site.
GR must have gotten the two stories mixed up.. Or at least that’s my take on it.
That sounds about right.
It’s alright. Was probably an easy mistake to make.
Indeed, however its there to protect the children.
That sounds hilarious
How exactly.
Its a protection act to ensure that all cases are taken seriously. If there was a questioning to determine if the child is telling the truth at the start before anything was to happen, the child could be harmed or worse. Its for their protection. If a person is innocent then there is nothing to worry about.
But to accuse an innocent man and cause him unnecessary trouble which could reflect on his life is also a crime and could counter charge for legal litigation’s. Such claims are serious ones and I’m not worried because I nave never committed such a a crime nor is there any proof.
But gawd damn it pisses me off that I have to defend myself for such ridiculous nonsense. You little future-less Internet pussies really need to get a life.
Indeed, however its there to protect the children.
That sounds hilarious
How exactly.
Its a protection act to ensure that all cases are taken seriously. If there was a questioning to determine if the child is telling the truth at the start before anything was to happen, the child could be harmed or worse. Its for their protection. If a person is innocent then there is nothing to worry about.
But to accuse an innocent man and cause him unnecessary trouble which could reflect on his life is also a crime and could counter charge for legal litigation’s. Such claims are serious ones and I’m not worried because I nave never committed such a a crime nor is there any proof.
But gawd damn it pisses me off that I have to defend myself for such ridiculous nonsense. You little future-less Internet pussies really need to get a life.
Indeed, however its there to protect the children.
That sounds hilarious
How exactly.
Its a protection act to ensure that all cases are taken seriously. If there was a questioning to determine if the child is telling the truth at the start before anything was to happen, the child could be harmed or worse. Its for their protection. If a person is innocent then there is nothing to worry about.
But to accuse an innocent man and cause him unnecessary trouble which could reflect on his life is also a crime and could counter charge for legal litigation’s. Such claims are serious ones and I’m not worried because I nave never committed such a a crime nor is there any proof.
But gawd damn it pisses me off that I have to defend myself for such ridiculous nonsense. You little future-less Internet pussies really need to get a life.
It was an honest mistake. Just a mix up..
Somehow I have a feeling you’re behind the whole thing CiddyPoo. Now your acting like all innocent trying yo cover your tracks when it comes down to it, you faceless coward!
But then again, it’s all speculation at this point.
---
Last edited 21 Jun 2008 01:39 am by Xtrm Liability
Indeed, however its there to protect the children.
That sounds hilarious
How exactly.
Its a protection act to ensure that all cases are taken seriously. If there was a questioning to determine if the child is telling the truth at the start before anything was to happen, the child could be harmed or worse. Its for their protection. If a person is innocent then there is nothing to worry about.
But to accuse an innocent man and cause him unnecessary trouble which could reflect on his life is also a crime and could counter charge for legal litigation’s. Such claims are serious ones and I’m not worried because I nave never committed such a a crime nor is there any proof.
But gawd damn it pisses me off that I have to defend myself for such ridiculous nonsense. You little future-less Internet pussies really need to get a life.
I can understand your frustrations and there is the option for ounter litigation if the accusations were made in the ideal of defaming and ruining your character. However if they are made out of genuine concerns, no countr litigation is normally allowed. A appolagy perhaps, but thats just the way the law system works.
Oh and for the record, I hope you don’t think I had any part in this pedophile accusations. I dodn’t know nearly enough about your goins on with the female population of MVC to even begin to presume anything of the sort.