ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Well, There isn’t much of a debate, There is evidence for evolution. We have many transitional fossils and such and DNA type evidence and the like. The only thing creation really has going for it is those with faith, which is not evidence of creation.
Fossils doesnt mean evidence for evolution?
If you had a room or shelf full of fossils, you couldnt tell me that the earth was billions of years old or we were created by apes.
What? No. Fossils ARE evidence evolution. I’ll find the video of all the transitional forms in just humans.
petrofsky wrote:
Evolution without a doubt. Religious people need to understand that creation and evolution CAN co-exist, but I doubt there was a form of creationism that happened.
They can co-exist. Though I do belive in creationism, I do belive that both of them had happened, but at separate times.
That is exactly what I am saying. A lot of religious people though get so offended by the idea evolution could be an answer, that they fail to realize that they can co exist.
Yeah, I’m not that kind of person thankfully. Ignorance is bliss to those such as them.
I agree.
Can you name me a religion that fits in with all the evidence that points towards evolution?
I’m just saying they can coexist, I didn’t say that they did, necessarily.
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Well, There isn’t much of a debate, There is evidence for evolution. We have many transitional fossils and such and DNA type evidence and the like. The only thing creation really has going for it is those with faith, which is not evidence of creation.
Fossils doesnt mean evidence for evolution?
If you had a room or shelf full of fossils, you couldnt tell me that the earth was billions of years old or we were created by apes.
What? No. Fossils ARE evidence evolution. I’ll find the video of all the transitional forms in just humans.
Created by apes?
fossils are not.......
--- alright the clans are back!!!! Lets revive the game section!
ChibiDiscoDhaos wrote:
Well, There isn’t much of a debate, There is evidence for evolution. We have many transitional fossils and such and DNA type evidence and the like. The only thing creation really has going for it is those with faith, which is not evidence of creation.
Fossils doesnt mean evidence for evolution?
If you had a room or shelf full of fossils, you couldnt tell me that the earth was billions of years old or we were created by apes.
What? No. Fossils ARE evidence evolution. I’ll find the video of all the transitional forms in just humans.
Created by apes?
fossils are not.......
I think he means showing evolution through the shaping of Human Skulls and Animal ones over thosands of years.
basically the , the men behind the curtain set up this whole “God” like figure that makes and does everything .
the reason for a man like this is controll .
if your stupid enough to believe in a giant invisible man in the clouds , than your stupid enough to be completely manipulated
for example : did you know that god can kill a man just by thinking about it ??
“really”
yeah now go and do all my work for me so i can just sit back and chill or gods gonna be pissed
LOL
religion = spiritual slavery
money= physical slavery
education= mental slavery
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
--- alright the clans are back!!!! Lets revive the game section!
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
You’re right, Chibi. Obviously the painting occurred naturally, presumably from a meteor hitting the Earth’s surface.
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
You’re right, Chibi. Obviously the painting occurred naturally, presumably from a meteor hitting the Earth’s surface.
What I am saying is that of course we know there is a painter, we have not found any evidence to show it can be formed naturally without a painter. You know, like stalagmites or something. We don’t see paintings growing in caves.
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
I have heard that argument before. It has been disprooved somwhere on youtube. I can dig it up if ya want?
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
no evidence? how about love? if you love anything there is evidence because God loves us so much, he sent his OWN son to die on the cross for our sins.
--- alright the clans are back!!!! Lets revive the game section!
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
I have heard that argument before. It has been disprooved somwhere on youtube. I can dig it up if ya want?
ok?
--- alright the clans are back!!!! Lets revive the game section!
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
no evidence? how about love? if you love anything there is evidence because God loves us so much, he sent his OWN son to die on the cross for our sins.
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Then tell me, what “painted” God?
And don’t tell me “He is eternal," because then that proves that you cannot use that statement, because, then obviously, not everything needs a creator.
Why does a painting have to have a painter? What about the painted desert? Although beautiful, its no mystery how it could come about. What about caves and the delicate complex crystal designs that are made over hundreds of thousands of years? They are astounding sights, and yet, we know how they can be naturally made. We can fully replicate a painting, but we cannot fully replicate the caves and other scenic environments we find.
markymark wrote:
i know that had nothing to do with the “Evilution” debate.
obviously i believe in evolution
and for all those british ppl out there start correcting your speech from evilution to EVOLUTION
baby steps right
so you believe “billions of years ago” a rock came out of nowhere and randomly blew up making everything today.........wow thats so true.
I believe there was a creator.
If you we walking down a forest and saw a painting. there were no footprints or anything of anyone near by, you would automatically assume there was a painter.
same thing here. there was a creator.
Talk about a bunch of weak arguments.
So a random omnipotent “God” created everything and we have no evidence for the existance of. Yeah thats SOOOOOO true.
The painting/painter argument is the stupidest thing ever. Seriously, we assume there is a painted because we have no naturalistic explanation of one being made other than a painter.
no evidence? how about love? if you love anything there is evidence because God loves us so much, he sent his OWN son to die on the cross for our sins.
Uh no. Love is not proof of anything god related.
well it isnt anything evolution related either. I doubt a rock can give love.
--- alright the clans are back!!!! Lets revive the game section!
bugsbunny wrote:
Both creation and evolution are religous. Not science.
Science is defined as something you can test, demonstrate and observe. you can’t test evolution, you cant demonstrate it.
the only thing evolution has going for it is tax support putting it in science text books etc.
That’s what most people think its science and its not.
Ah the words of the ignorant.
Evolutionary Biology can be tested with bacteria, and insects, observed through out the fossil records.
Evolutionary study has never needed taxpayer money.. why? because evolution actually produce useful information that can be use to make vaccines, help grow crops larger and much faster.
The taxpayer money that is use to buy educational books, has nothing to do with evolution or the funding it gets from investors.. It has all to do with educating the students.
Without evolution, nothing in biology would make sense.
If evolution is a religion, then so is every branch of science.
--- Theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena.
»
Religion
» Creation vs. Evolution Debate topic
