| 03 Jul 2008 03:22 pm |
Regular Rep: 12 Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 561 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kinda suck now. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying. ---
 Last edited 03 Jul 2008 03:28 pm by MOO555 | |
|
| 03 Jul 2008 03:31 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kidna suck. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying.
I know but no matter what they have to be connected to you in some way.
You can’t just host a match and people can go through a list and click on one they want to join.
I loved the new additions but I noticed quickly that every map has the same exact weapon and vehicle set.
They slowed down the warthog so it is literally useless. It’s all about the stupid quad they added in.
I like the quad but why did they pretty much replace the warthog with that stupid vehicle? Warthogs were the standard vehicle. Now it’s weaponless quads.
Every map is obsessed with the Spartan Laser, which gets dull after a while. I miss the rocket launcher. What’s the point in having a weapon you can never use?
The level editing is so limited. Far Cry had better level editing. You can’t even spawn and deleted elephants.
Air combat is kind of poor. There should have been another human vehicle more akin to the Banshee. The Hornet is just too overpowered. when I had the game it was 10 on one and I blew them all up the second the respawned. My kill count was fucking high. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:40 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kinda suck now. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying.
custom games is the worst part of halo 3 matchmaking is where its at ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:44 pm |
Regular Rep: 12 Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 561 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kidna suck. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying.
I know but no matter what they have to be connected to you in some way.
You can’t just host a match and people can go through a list and click on one they want to join.
I loved the new additions but I noticed quickly that every map has the same exact weapon and vehicle set.
They slowed down the warthog so it is literally useless. It’s all about the stupid quad they added in.
I like the quad but why did they pretty much replace the warthog with that stupid vehicle? Warthogs were the standard vehicle. Now it’s weaponless quads.
Every map is obsessed with the Spartan Laser, which gets dull after a while. I miss the rocket launcher. What’s the point in having a weapon you can never use?
The level editing is so limited. Far Cry had better level editing. You can’t even spawn and deleted elephants.
Air combat is kind of poor. There should have been another human vehicle more akin to the Banshee. The Hornet is just too overpowered. when I had the game it was 10 on one and I blew them all up the second the respawned. My kill count was fucking high.
Yeah i see what u mean, and no DIsturbed matchmaking gets too repetetive. ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:50 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kidna suck. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying.
I know but no matter what they have to be connected to you in some way.
You can’t just host a match and people can go through a list and click on one they want to join.
I loved the new additions but I noticed quickly that every map has the same exact weapon and vehicle set.
They slowed down the warthog so it is literally useless. It’s all about the stupid quad they added in.
I like the quad but why did they pretty much replace the warthog with that stupid vehicle? Warthogs were the standard vehicle. Now it’s weaponless quads.
Every map is obsessed with the Spartan Laser, which gets dull after a while. I miss the rocket launcher. What’s the point in having a weapon you can never use?
The level editing is so limited. Far Cry had better level editing. You can’t even spawn and deleted elephants.
Air combat is kind of poor. There should have been another human vehicle more akin to the Banshee. The Hornet is just too overpowered. when I had the game it was 10 on one and I blew them all up the second the respawned. My kill count was fucking high.
Yeah i see what u mean, and no DIsturbed matchmaking gets too repetetive.
Well you are the minority in that one  ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:56 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36  Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol. ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:57 pm |
Regular Rep: 12 Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 561 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
MOO555 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Honestly i have to say H3 does kidna suck. The only good thing about it is Forge and Custom Games. Oh and ur not stuck to playing custom games with ur firends only 21, u can have others join who aren’t on ur friends list. Just saying.
I know but no matter what they have to be connected to you in some way.
You can’t just host a match and people can go through a list and click on one they want to join.
I loved the new additions but I noticed quickly that every map has the same exact weapon and vehicle set.
They slowed down the warthog so it is literally useless. It’s all about the stupid quad they added in.
I like the quad but why did they pretty much replace the warthog with that stupid vehicle? Warthogs were the standard vehicle. Now it’s weaponless quads.
Every map is obsessed with the Spartan Laser, which gets dull after a while. I miss the rocket launcher. What’s the point in having a weapon you can never use?
The level editing is so limited. Far Cry had better level editing. You can’t even spawn and deleted elephants.
Air combat is kind of poor. There should have been another human vehicle more akin to the Banshee. The Hornet is just too overpowered. when I had the game it was 10 on one and I blew them all up the second the respawned. My kill count was fucking high.
Yeah i see what u mean, and no DIsturbed matchmaking gets too repetetive.
Well you are the minority in that one 
Oh well. If i wanted to play a game for rank i’d play BF: BC or COD4. ---
 Last edited 03 Jul 2008 03:57 pm by MOO555 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:57 pm |
Regular Rep: 12 Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 561 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
He didn’t have a 360 when avalanche released so he prbly didn’t know. ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 03:59 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:03 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:03 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:04 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters? ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:05 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:05 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36  Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies? you have to look into the game to see that it’s actually a system hog.
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core) ---
 Last edited 03 Jul 2008 04:07 pm by CPO Fraser | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:06 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:07 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
dont be bullshitting all games use all the cores...GEars of war used 1 core for graphics other for PHYSICS and other for A.I and the others for miscellaneous stuff ---
 Last edited 03 Jul 2008 04:07 pm by Di5turbed | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:08 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways.
LOL@not interested at ps3s top game lmfao ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:08 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36  Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
dont be bullshitting all games use all the cores...GEars of war used 1 core for graphics other for PHYSICS and other for A.I
each one used about 30% of a core, which would be 90% of a single core if it was all on a single core. ---
 | |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:10 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways.
LOL@not interested at ps3s top game lmfao
lol
I don’t know what MGS games are like. My ignorance is at fault with MGS4. ---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 03 Jul 2008 04:11 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36  Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game. ---
 Last edited 03 Jul 2008 04:12 pm by CPO Fraser | |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |