| 03 Jul 2008 04:11 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44  Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways.
LOL@not interested at ps3s top game lmfao
lol
I don’t know what MGS games are like. My ignorance is at fault with MGS4.
Eh you dont need to OTHER MGS games were way different than this one...Old ones were about stealth this one is about shooting and gunsblazing with like 80 different guns with a kikass story and complex online
 | | | | 03 Jul 2008 04:14 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38 Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:15 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways.
LOL@not interested at ps3s top game lmfao
lol
I don’t know what MGS games are like. My ignorance is at fault with MGS4.
Eh you dont need to OTHER MGS games were way different than this one...Old ones were about stealth this one is about shooting and gunsblazing with like 80 different guns with a kikass story and complex online
Sounds alright.
I still think Bad Company is better despite how badly its single player sucks.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:16 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36 Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
 | | | 03 Jul 2008 04:16 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Just like MGS4 ps3s biggest game
I don’t like MGS4.
Why? you dont like third person shooters?
I never played it and I’m not interested enough to buy buy it.
I’m getting Civ Rev anyways.
LOL@not interested at ps3s top game lmfao
lol
I don’t know what MGS games are like. My ignorance is at fault with MGS4.
Eh you dont need to OTHER MGS games were way different than this one...Old ones were about stealth this one is about shooting and gunsblazing with like 80 different guns with a kikass story and complex online
Sounds alright.
I still think Bad Company is better despite how badly its single player sucks.
:/
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:16 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
wow please KAMEO had better textures than halo 3s POS textures
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:18 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
wow please KAMEO had better textures than halo 3s POS textures
:O you’re right!
*slits wrists*
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:21 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
wow please KAMEO had better textures than halo 3s POS textures
:O you’re right!
*slits wrists*
PDZ AND KAMEO I think has the best textures this gen...wait no fact... 
*slits next*
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:21 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
wow please KAMEO had better textures than halo 3s POS textures
:O you’re right!
*slits wrists*
PDZ AND KAMEO I think has the best textures this gen...wait no fact...
*slits next*
PDZ’s looked pretty.
*slits wrists*
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:23 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:25 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
You obviously knew what I meant by messed up, I meant unusual and unique, something you don’t often encounter in halo 3 or any game.
Lighting effects is a part of graphics, so are textures, polygons etc etc.
Last edited 03 Jul 2008 04:27 pm by CPO Fraser | | | 03 Jul 2008 04:29 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | Lighting is the biggest part in graphics...HI RES TEXTURES mean shit if it has crappy lighting while low textures can look mazing with awesome lighting ---
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:30 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
You obviously knew what I meant by messed up, I meant unusual and unique, something you don’t often encounter in halo 3 or any game.
Lighting effects is a part of graphics, so are textures, polygons etc etc.
I have to admit that is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Not you but just the whole lighting thing.
The messed up lighting is pointless and pretty much ANY game can do that. They just need to update a game with a patch allowing that. It’s just stupid.
The polgygons and textures are last gen too. lol
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:32 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | ---
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:33 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Is that Half-Life 2? ---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:34 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | halo 3 ---
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:34 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
You obviously knew what I meant by messed up, I meant unusual and unique, something you don’t often encounter in halo 3 or any game.
Lighting effects is a part of graphics, so are textures, polygons etc etc.
I have to admit that is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Not you but just the whole lighting thing.
The messed up lighting is pointless and pretty much ANY game can do that. They just need to update a game with a patch allowing that. It’s just stupid.
The polgygons and textures are last gen too. lol
Now I know you’re over exaggerating, textures in halo 3 are crazy and I know many would agree with me on this, every one into saved film and zoomed in on a thrown grenade? zoomed in on a traffic cone? zoomed in on armor?
And I guess you’ve counted all the polygons right? you should know there are 4 times more per object in halo3 then there were in Halo 2 average.
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:34 pm |
Taking noobs to school Rep: 44Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 16,040 OFFLINE | CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
You obviously knew what I meant by messed up, I meant unusual and unique, something you don’t often encounter in halo 3 or any game.
Lighting effects is a part of graphics, so are textures, polygons etc etc.
I have to admit that is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Not you but just the whole lighting thing.
The messed up lighting is pointless and pretty much ANY game can do that. They just need to update a game with a patch allowing that. It’s just stupid.
The polgygons and textures are last gen too. lol
Now I know you’re over exaggerating, textures in halo 3 are crazy and I know many would agree with me on this, every one into saved film and zoomed in on a thrown grenade? zoomed in on a traffic cone? zoomed in on armor?
And I guess you’ve counted all the polygons right? you should know there are 4 times more per object in halo3 then there were in Halo 2 average.
Actually bungie said it was only 1.5 more...and that was in the original OMFGWTFBBQ halo 3 trailer...
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:36 pm |
------SSDD------ Rep: 36Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 12,726 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Like a new map will fix how lame the game is. You can never drive a tank or shoot a rocket launcher in ranked games.
You have to manually fix Bunjie’s screw ups and then you still can only play with thos maps with friends.
Uh... yeah you can... there is a tank on Avalanche, rockets are all over ranked matches...
dude you’re allowed to have an opinion on a game but don’t straight up lie, lol.
I sold it before Avalanche and one map hardly changes a thing.
The game could have easily been on the xbox. It doesn’t take advantage of any of the 360 hardware for gameplay. Alright visuals and water. It was a disappointment.
Did you zoom in on textures? see how every single grenade doesn’t trigger a script it triggers actual lighting effects that are different depending on how geometry effects it? the Artificial intelligence? huge ass enviroments and buckets of enemies?
:/ no way in hell, this game was more processor heavy then GeoW (Halo 3 took 2 cores where as gears took 90% of a single core)
That’s funny because it still looks like shit compared to other games.
Maybe if you go into it already thinking “omg it looks like shiet” and not actually look into it to see the amount of detail put into the game, it’s easily one of the better looking games this generation due to it’s amazing lighting.
This is a totally ingame unphotoshoped screenshot, made possible by the fact that if you throw a power drainer or some lighting emitting object, then throw a grenade which also emits light, it creates a unique look.
Maybe you should have payed closer attention to the game and not judged it without actually looking into the game.
Lighting does not make up for poor graphics.
I was really hyped about the game when I went in.
Look who is making up bullshit now.
Wtf? That is the gayest screenshot I’ve ever seen. The graphics are terrible. Wtf was the point in that bullshit?
LIGHTING IS A PART OF GRAPHICS.
as well are the textures, which are unbelievable for a console game in Halo 3.
And you clearly don’t understand what I said about the screenshot, thats lighting from grenades and other weapons ingame that emit light creating a messed up lighting effect that makes the colors look interesting, a result of how complicated the lighting in the game is.
That’s a result of how gay the lighting is. You admitted yourself that the lighting messes up so you can take your light and shove it up your ass. Then you can take you head and do the same with your head so you can see the wonderful lighting up there.
Lighting is graphics. It’s similar but not the same thing.
You obviously knew what I meant by messed up, I meant unusual and unique, something you don’t often encounter in halo 3 or any game.
Lighting effects is a part of graphics, so are textures, polygons etc etc.
I have to admit that is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Not you but just the whole lighting thing.
The messed up lighting is pointless and pretty much ANY game can do that. They just need to update a game with a patch allowing that. It’s just stupid.
The polgygons and textures are last gen too. lol
Now I know you’re over exaggerating, textures in halo 3 are crazy and I know many would agree with me on this, every one into saved film and zoomed in on a thrown grenade? zoomed in on a traffic cone? zoomed in on armor?
And I guess you’ve counted all the polygons right? you should know there are 4 times more per object in halo3 then there were in Halo 2 average.
Actually bungie said it was only 1.5 more...and that was in the original OMFGWTFBBQ halo 3 trailer...
Nope, 4X in all except master chiefs armor as his armor is the one real thing that looks like shit in the game.
| | | 03 Jul 2008 04:36 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Di5turbed wrote:
halo 3
lol
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
|
»
Games
» New Halo 3 Map Cold Storage is a Freebie, July 7th
