Next Gameboy

Zucas wrote: Nervin- yes so now they can start thinking about other things to make games better instead of just giving it a graphical overhaul. I’d very much appreciate it haha.

NEREVAR117 wrote:

I want enemies that can actually think, rather then following scripts. They use real logic. I want destructible environments. (ala Alan wake) And I want thousands of enemies on screen in massive LOTR style games.

Some day we will have games like this, sadly not today.

NEREVAR117 wrote:

I want enemies that can actually think, rather then following scripts. They use real logic. I want destructible environments. (ala Alan wake) And I want thousands of enemies on screen in massive LOTR style games.

Some day we will have games like this, sadly not today.

The Dahaka wrote: And I want a good action game where you can actually get something out of it. I mean, really smart A.I., who can virtually match you in a swordfight, or in a race or any other kind of thing in a game. I want to have a blast when I play a game, and unexpecting things to happen so I can enjoy the game for what it is.

Zucas wrote: I really want game that has realistic physics. Cause if this happens, the run and gun shooters, the unreal action games have to be taken to new levels. Now I love the unrealistic ones, but I think this is what the shooter genre needs. Some realism in your decisions. Where really getting shot once will kill you or at least wound you. Where really the lives of your squad mates matter to the success of your mission or something like that. I think this is what the shooter genre needs to really turn it around give a new perspective of it.

the21gamer wrote:

Ai will get really smart but I dont think that will ever happen. Humans are too unpredictable sometimes.

The Dahaka wrote:

I know, but it would make for a very decent game.

the21gamer wrote:

It would.

the21gamer wrote: The only emotion I have when I play games is running someone over and being happy.

Nothing can change that for me unless it’s an interactive more and not really a game.

the21gamer wrote: Nerevar- You know the PSP Slim has a smaller battery but lasts as long as the PSP phat battery. Use a phat battery on a slim and it’s double that. The PSP was a technological marvel when it came out because of all the power it had. Battery life was a concern but they handled it pretty well. I think in 3 or 4 years time they can pull off the same thing for the PSP2.

The PSP Slim has power save options too and different screen brightnesses that can increase battery life.

The iphone I was reading up on and it is roughly 3x or 5x more powerful than the PSP and the battery can last a day on the internet. It probably wont last as long playing games because it was designed for music, movies, and a phone but that shows what can be done.

Zucas wrote:

I thought Twilight Princess’s ending was very emotional. I mean the story just brought you in so much that by the time you got to the end of the game, what happened with teh characters really did matter.


I mean it’s things that I see like that what I see most lacking in games. I mean I’ve seen Wall-E twice now, and the emotion captured in something that is so lifeless by nature and had barely any speaking parts was incredibly done in that movie. If you’ve seen Wall E then you know what I mean. That movie was simply amazing because by the end of the movie you were so drawn in emotionally that you were on edge by what was going on with the characters.

And those are CG animations. So it can be done in games, especially which will use voice acting, although that sometimes ruins it I suppose haha. This is what I want to see in games mostly. I think the best games are the one that draws you in. Whether by gameplay or story, it’s what makes those games the best. When you are emotionally attached to what goes on in the game, you’ll enjoy it so much more. It’s just most games don’t do that becasue they try to attach you to characters that really just aren’t believable or built up well.