Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
That whole post was filled with ignorance...
Why is it that I can play expert on Rock Band but not GH? Rock band was fucking easy for the most part compared to GH3!
SILVERXXX wrote:
GH doesn’t have a realism style to it Atresac, it has a cartoonish feel.... RB is meant to look real...
I know it doesn’t, but just compare GH and GHII to GHIII. The first two had bright, vibrant colors and a cartoony feel to it. Proportions were exaggerated, there were solid colors and characters actually shined and looked good, while the members of the audience danced and moved in unique ways.
GHIII has darker lighting, the cartoony feel is pretty much gone, replacing everything with chunky character models and shitty textures on the clothes, and let’s not forget the singer’s face.
All those things just made GHIII not as fun to play as the previous installments, because it didn’t have a fun look to it anymore. Not to mention, again, the songs sucked cocks.
SILVERXXX wrote:
GH doesn’t have a realism style to it Atresac, it has a cartoonish feel.... RB is meant to look real...
I know it doesn’t, but just compare GH and GHII to GHIII. The first two had bright, vibrant colors and a cartoony feel to it. Proportions were exaggerated, there were solid colors and characters actually shined and looked good, while the members of the audience danced and moved in unique ways.
GHIII has darker lighting, the cartoony feel is pretty much gone, replacing everything with chunky character models and shitty textures on the clothes, and let’s not forget the singer’s face.
All those things just made GHIII not as fun to play as the previous installments, because it didn’t have a fun look to it anymore. Not to mention, again, the songs sucked cocks.
I know this doesn’t make much since but I think the reason GH3 looked worse to you is because it was a shaped up version of the cartoon feel, the cartoon feel prolly looked better to you in gh1 and 2 because well the graphics were worse....
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
That whole post was filled with ignorance...
Why is it that I can play expert on Rock Band but not GH? Rock band was fucking easy for the most part compared to GH3!
Rock Band expert mode is on the same level as expert mode in Guitar Hero and Guitar Hero II. Want to know why things are harder in Guitar Hero 3? Because Neversoft can’t fucking make a music game, that’s why. They tried boosting the difficulty of the game too much from the previous games and it didn’t work. Things are harder in GH3 because you are quite literally playing notes that aren’t there. It’s hard to tell in solos and fast parts, which is mainly where they get away with it, but they will add notes at awkward times just to raise the difficulty setting, at the cost of actually keeping the game on time with the music.
SILVERXXX wrote:
GH doesn’t have a realism style to it Atresac, it has a cartoonish feel.... RB is meant to look real...
I know it doesn’t, but just compare GH and GHII to GHIII. The first two had bright, vibrant colors and a cartoony feel to it. Proportions were exaggerated, there were solid colors and characters actually shined and looked good, while the members of the audience danced and moved in unique ways.
GHIII has darker lighting, the cartoony feel is pretty much gone, replacing everything with chunky character models and shitty textures on the clothes, and let’s not forget the singer’s face.
All those things just made GHIII not as fun to play as the previous installments, because it didn’t have a fun look to it anymore. Not to mention, again, the songs sucked cocks.
I know this doesn’t make much since but I think the reason GH3 looked worse to you is because it was a shaped up version of the cartoon feel, the cartoon feel prolly looked better to you in gh1 and 2 because well the graphics were worse....
They tried adding too much to something that didn’t need adding. The first two games didn’t have textures and the pants were basically a solid color save for the shadows, but it looked 10x better and things weren’t nearly as blocky and ugly.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
That whole post was filled with ignorance...
Why is it that I can play expert on Rock Band but not GH? Rock band was fucking easy for the most part compared to GH3!
Rock Band expert mode is on the same level as expert mode in Guitar Hero and Guitar Hero II. Want to know why things are harder in Guitar Hero 3? Because Neversoft can’t fucking make a music game, that’s why. They tried boosting the difficulty of the game too much from the previous games and it didn’t work. Things are harder in GH3 because you are quite literally playing notes that aren’t there. It’s hard to tell in solos and fast parts, which is mainly where they get away with it, but they will add notes at awkward times just to raise the difficulty setting, at the cost of actually keeping the game on time with the music.
At least they mix it up a lot with different notes, RB relies on speed to much for difficulty.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
That whole post was filled with ignorance...
Why is it that I can play expert on Rock Band but not GH? Rock band was fucking easy for the most part compared to GH3!
Rock Band expert mode is on the same level as expert mode in Guitar Hero and Guitar Hero II. Want to know why things are harder in Guitar Hero 3? Because Neversoft can’t fucking make a music game, that’s why. They tried boosting the difficulty of the game too much from the previous games and it didn’t work. Things are harder in GH3 because you are quite literally playing notes that aren’t there. It’s hard to tell in solos and fast parts, which is mainly where they get away with it, but they will add notes at awkward times just to raise the difficulty setting, at the cost of actually keeping the game on time with the music.
At least they mix it up a lot with different notes, RB relies on speed to much for difficulty.
Were you not listening? By adding notes and chords that aren’t really there in the first place, they make it so you might as well not even be playing a music game anymore, and just simon says with background noise. At least with speed there’s still the musical aspect to it, instead of just tapping away without rhythm in the hopes that you get the note that’s not even actually in the song.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
Oh I agree the library on GH3 was great, Atresac just didn’t like it and he thinks it means the library is automatically bad just because he didn’t like it....
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
That whole post was filled with ignorance...
Why is it that I can play expert on Rock Band but not GH? Rock band was fucking easy for the most part compared to GH3!
Rock Band expert mode is on the same level as expert mode in Guitar Hero and Guitar Hero II. Want to know why things are harder in Guitar Hero 3? Because Neversoft can’t fucking make a music game, that’s why. They tried boosting the difficulty of the game too much from the previous games and it didn’t work. Things are harder in GH3 because you are quite literally playing notes that aren’t there. It’s hard to tell in solos and fast parts, which is mainly where they get away with it, but they will add notes at awkward times just to raise the difficulty setting, at the cost of actually keeping the game on time with the music.
At least they mix it up a lot with different notes, RB relies on speed to much for difficulty.
Were you not listening? By adding notes and chords that aren’t really there in the first place, they make it so you might as well not even be playing a music game anymore, and just simon says with background noise. At least with speed there’s still the musical aspect to it, instead of just tapping away without rhythm in the hopes that you get the note that’s not even actually in the song.
The reason I didn’t worry too much about your last post is because it is fucking arrogant, show me these “Notes that arent really in the fucking song” I dont know what the fuck you are talking about. I loved both GH2 and 3 and if I liked 3 without Harmonix then I am not worried about WT. I mean have you seen it?
The main reason why GH4 pwns all is something RB2 has no answer 4. Thers gonna be versions of every single song ever online. Paranoid? Yep. Hallowed Be Thy Name? Yep. Thunderstruck? Yep.
Enter Sandman? Yep.
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Every one of the songs by those bands are ran heavily by guitar, WTF are you talking about?
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Sorry, im still waiting for the “In my opinion” bit, hater
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
You haven’t even played World Tour. Stop judging, well anyway, I won, it’s over, World Tour will make you gay, you lose, phail.
»
Games
» Rock Band 2 and Guitar Hero: World Tour Everlong Gameplay Comparison
