G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Every one of the songs by those bands are ran heavily by guitar, WTF are you talking about?
Sex Pistols, Tenacious D (funny as they are, aren’t noted for their complicated guitar work), ZZ Top? They may use distortion but their stuff isn’t difficult at all, unless they add in notes that aren’t there.
It is called variety, why does the guitar have to be the most complicated shit just to be in the song?
You’re right. Why would anyone think to that putting a song that doesn’t make the guitar work the primary focus, or even challenging, into a game based around playing the guitar? yes, a game called guitar hero which is based solely around guitar work, should make room for songs whose guitar role is just the same two segments repeated over and over again.
People vary, for example, those are some of me favorite songs.
Yeah, it’s got to be really fun playing
O-O —
-O-O-
O — —
O — —
50 times until the song ends. I mean that’s what makes a game fun right? Playing the same sequence of notes until the song’s over, with maybe a slight change by moving all the notes down to the right? Yeah, that’s one fun-ass game to play.
I love it when notes repeat in Guitar Hero, it is awesome, it’s fun, and you can’t make it better.
You do realize you basically just said “I think repetitive gameplay is the best thing ever” don’t you?
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
It seems you conviniently left out Hendrix, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne and Muse :P
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
It seems you conviniently left out Hendrix, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne and Muse :P
3 bands in a sea of shit (muse is horrible).
Yep, that makes me want to buy a $100 game.
None of this really matters, becos of downloadin studio songs, which you hav convenientli ignored
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Every one of the songs by those bands are ran heavily by guitar, WTF are you talking about?
Sex Pistols, Tenacious D (funny as they are, aren’t noted for their complicated guitar work), ZZ Top? They may use distortion but their stuff isn’t difficult at all, unless they add in notes that aren’t there.
It is called variety, why does the guitar have to be the most complicated shit just to be in the song?
You’re right. Why would anyone think to that putting a song that doesn’t make the guitar work the primary focus, or even challenging, into a game based around playing the guitar? yes, a game called guitar hero which is based solely around guitar work, should make room for songs whose guitar role is just the same two segments repeated over and over again.
People vary, for example, those are some of me favorite songs.
Yeah, it’s got to be really fun playing
O-O —
-O-O-
O — —
O — —
50 times until the song ends. I mean that’s what makes a game fun right? Playing the same sequence of notes until the song’s over, with maybe a slight change by moving all the notes down to the right? Yeah, that’s one fun-ass game to play.
I love it when notes repeat in Guitar Hero, it is awesome, it’s fun, and you can’t make it better.
You do realize you basically just said “I think repetitive gameplay is the best thing ever” don’t you?
You might be confusing “easy” with “fun”.
You might be thinking wrong too. I was just agreeing and yet you are so quick to jump on my case. Please, just admit you lost.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
Oh please, yes I dont like Linkin Park but does that mean the game sucks hell no, sorry Atresac... the game has variety for all people not just you, there wont be a game in which every song fits to your liking.... You cant tell me you like every fucking song on RB....
I don’t care if I like the song, the point is will the game work for a music-based game and be fun. If a song, by any band, is the same notes over and over, the same beats over and over, it gets really boring really fast. Bands like Linkin Park and Michael Jackson excel at writing 7 seconds worth of music, and turning it into a 4 minute song. At that point, if you play the first segment of the song once, it’s just an endurance contest.
75% of songs in the world have the guitar in which you will play the same thing because that’s how the song goes until the solo, I know GH has a lot of songs in which the guitar is repetitive and so does RB, it’s music, a verse should be played the same as the last verse if they have the same beat, the buttons shouln’t just change to make it different, that is exactly what you dislike
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
It seems you conviniently left out Hendrix, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne and Muse :P
3 bands in a sea of shit (muse is horrible).
Yep, that makes me want to buy a $100 game.
None of this really matters, becos of downloadin studio songs, which you hav convenientli ignored
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
Oh please, yes I dont like Linkin Park but does that mean the game sucks hell no, sorry Atresac... the game has variety for all people not just you, there wont be a game in which every song fits to your liking.... You cant tell me you like every fucking song on RB....
I don’t care if I like the song, the point is will the game work for a music-based game and be fun. If a song, by any band, is the same notes over and over, the same beats over and over, it gets really boring really fast. Bands like Linkin Park and Michael Jackson excel at writing 7 seconds worth of music, and turning it into a 4 minute song. At that point, if you play the first segment of the song once, it’s just an endurance contest.
75% of songs in the world have the guitar in which you will play the same thing because that’s how the song goes until the solo, I know GH has a lot of songs in which the guitar is repetitive and so does RB, it’s music, a verse should be played the same as the last verse if they have the same beat, the buttons shouln’t just change to make it different, that is exactly what you dislike
Verses don’t excuse a repetitive song. Just because you’re in a verse doesn’t excuse only 5 notes repeated over and over. Some changes are required to make the song not boring to play.
GH had things like the Ramones, which was one of the most boring songs to play in the game. But guess what? It was on the first tier. So pretty much it had a reason to be depressingly easy. Not like, what was it, Disturbed in the second-to-last tier?
G’NR
Iron Maiden
Metallica
Black Sabbath
SRV
Santana
Dragonforce
Foghat
Cream
Tenacious D
Living Colour
Pearl Jam (Even Flow was very good for a grunge song)
Sex Pistols
Final boss song was pretty good
The Who
ZZ Top
Aerosmith
Whoeva did Mississipi Queen
And more
A good half of the bands there, as well as the majority of the songs on the game, are either boring or don’t focus on guitar work enough to warrant being in a guitar hero game.
Every one of the songs by those bands are ran heavily by guitar, WTF are you talking about?
Sex Pistols, Tenacious D (funny as they are, aren’t noted for their complicated guitar work), ZZ Top? They may use distortion but their stuff isn’t difficult at all, unless they add in notes that aren’t there.
It is called variety, why does the guitar have to be the most complicated shit just to be in the song?
You’re right. Why would anyone think to that putting a song that doesn’t make the guitar work the primary focus, or even challenging, into a game based around playing the guitar? yes, a game called guitar hero which is based solely around guitar work, should make room for songs whose guitar role is just the same two segments repeated over and over again.
People vary, for example, those are some of me favorite songs.
Yeah, it’s got to be really fun playing
O-O —
-O-O-
O — —
O — —
50 times until the song ends. I mean that’s what makes a game fun right? Playing the same sequence of notes until the song’s over, with maybe a slight change by moving all the notes down to the right? Yeah, that’s one fun-ass game to play.
I love it when notes repeat in Guitar Hero, it is awesome, it’s fun, and you can’t make it better.
You do realize you basically just said “I think repetitive gameplay is the best thing ever” don’t you?
You might be confusing “easy” with “fun”.
You might be thinking wrong too. I was just agreeing and yet you are so quick to jump on my case. Please, just admit you lost.
First of all: what are you even talking about with “lost”? Lost what? This isn’t a contest or a game, it’s soem people on the internet arguing over which music-based video game is better. So please, stop acting like you’ve “won” anything.
And second, you realize you were agreeing with sarcasm don’t you?
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
Oh please, yes I dont like Linkin Park but does that mean the game sucks hell no, sorry Atresac... the game has variety for all people not just you, there wont be a game in which every song fits to your liking.... You cant tell me you like every fucking song on RB....
I don’t care if I like the song, the point is will the game work for a music-based game and be fun. If a song, by any band, is the same notes over and over, the same beats over and over, it gets really boring really fast. Bands like Linkin Park and Michael Jackson excel at writing 7 seconds worth of music, and turning it into a 4 minute song. At that point, if you play the first segment of the song once, it’s just an endurance contest.
75% of songs in the world have the guitar in which you will play the same thing because that’s how the song goes until the solo, I know GH has a lot of songs in which the guitar is repetitive and so does RB, it’s music, a verse should be played the same as the last verse if they have the same beat, the buttons shouln’t just change to make it different, that is exactly what you dislike
Verses don’t excuse a repetitive song. Just because you’re in a verse doesn’t excuse only 5 notes repeated over and over. Some changes are required to make the song not boring to play.
GH had things like the Ramones, which was one of the most boring songs to play in the game. But guess what? It was on the first tier. So pretty much it had a reason to be depressingly easy. Not like, what was it, Disturbed in the second-to-last tier?
Oh wow help me now...... you are now tslking about a song you disliked compared to a song you liked in a later tier, I bet that disturbed song was repetitive but you just didn;t notice it due to the fact that you uhhh actually enjoyed the song...worthless...
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
Oh please, yes I dont like Linkin Park but does that mean the game sucks hell no, sorry Atresac... the game has variety for all people not just you, there wont be a game in which every song fits to your liking.... You cant tell me you like every fucking song on RB....
I don’t care if I like the song, the point is will the game work for a music-based game and be fun. If a song, by any band, is the same notes over and over, the same beats over and over, it gets really boring really fast. Bands like Linkin Park and Michael Jackson excel at writing 7 seconds worth of music, and turning it into a 4 minute song. At that point, if you play the first segment of the song once, it’s just an endurance contest.
75% of songs in the world have the guitar in which you will play the same thing because that’s how the song goes until the solo, I know GH has a lot of songs in which the guitar is repetitive and so does RB, it’s music, a verse should be played the same as the last verse if they have the same beat, the buttons shouln’t just change to make it different, that is exactly what you dislike
Verses don’t excuse a repetitive song. Just because you’re in a verse doesn’t excuse only 5 notes repeated over and over. Some changes are required to make the song not boring to play.
GH had things like the Ramones, which was one of the most boring songs to play in the game. But guess what? It was on the first tier. So pretty much it had a reason to be depressingly easy. Not like, what was it, Disturbed in the second-to-last tier?
Oh wow help me now...... you are now tslking about a song you disliked compared to a song you liked in a later tier, I bet that disturbed song was repetitive but you just didn;t notice it due to the fact that you uhhh actually enjoyed the song...worthless...
...What? No, I know the Disturbed song was repetitive (also: I don’t like Disturbed at all). I was saying that in GH, they at least had the decency to put the repetitive, easy songs in the first tiers. But in GHIII, they still have repetitive easy songs in the later tiers which should be for songs that are harder and more challenging.
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
Oh please, yes I dont like Linkin Park but does that mean the game sucks hell no, sorry Atresac... the game has variety for all people not just you, there wont be a game in which every song fits to your liking.... You cant tell me you like every fucking song on RB....
I don’t care if I like the song, the point is will the game work for a music-based game and be fun. If a song, by any band, is the same notes over and over, the same beats over and over, it gets really boring really fast. Bands like Linkin Park and Michael Jackson excel at writing 7 seconds worth of music, and turning it into a 4 minute song. At that point, if you play the first segment of the song once, it’s just an endurance contest.
75% of songs in the world have the guitar in which you will play the same thing because that’s how the song goes until the solo, I know GH has a lot of songs in which the guitar is repetitive and so does RB, it’s music, a verse should be played the same as the last verse if they have the same beat, the buttons shouln’t just change to make it different, that is exactly what you dislike
Verses don’t excuse a repetitive song. Just because you’re in a verse doesn’t excuse only 5 notes repeated over and over. Some changes are required to make the song not boring to play.
GH had things like the Ramones, which was one of the most boring songs to play in the game. But guess what? It was on the first tier. So pretty much it had a reason to be depressingly easy. Not like, what was it, Disturbed in the second-to-last tier?
Oh wow help me now...... you are now tslking about a song you disliked compared to a song you liked in a later tier, I bet that disturbed song was repetitive but you just didn;t notice it due to the fact that you uhhh actually enjoyed the song...worthless...
...What? No, I know the Disturbed song was repetitive (also: I don’t like Disturbed at all). I was saying that in GH, they at least had the decency to put the repetitive, easy songs in the first tiers. But in GHIII, they still have repetitive easy songs in the later tiers which should be for songs that are harder and more challenging.
Okay idk what you are talking about but the late tiers were impossible in GH3 and you just said that Disturbed song was repetitive and in a late tier then you dare to say GH3 put reperitive songs in their late tiers......what?
Dhem92 wrote:
Can we stop doing this fact thing now? I see no problem in graphics, layout, and Aerosmith has nothing to do with World Tour. You are making up excuses to make yourself feel better. You just phailed. End of discussion
The FACT, is that neversoft has completely fucked up Guitar Hero as a franchise and ruined any fun it had to begin with. Guitar Hero III sucked, Guitar Hero Aerosmith was terrible and a bad idea to start, Guitar Hero 4 will suck just as well. Neversoft can’t do anything right.
SILVERXXX wrote:
^^^^ Exactly, Atresac, Studio is only for those people who are creative and want to make their own song, what is the problem with that? Do you know how many guitar sound they have in Studio? Activision went all out on this shit man!
You mean for those people who want to work instead of play?
Hey if you want to waste hours tediously making your own songs with a guitar controller with 5 buttons go ahead.
Guitar Hero III was awesome. I loved the battle mode and new songs. And at least support why it wasn’t good.
Guitar Hero III was the worst in the series. Especially as far as presentation, with shotty graphics, low framerates, and the whole layout being terrible.
Not to mention the song list was full of shitty nu metal songs and other songs that don’t focus on guitar at all. I mean come on, Weezer? The entirety of GHIII was a shit sandwich.
Presentation, graphics, low framerates, and the layout do not make a game where you can barely see that image or cannot at all effect the game. There you go again, trying to make up some bull shit that has nothing to do with the gameplay. To me, all I see in Rock Band 2 are more songs. I don’t see any improvement at all. World Tour is a huge jump from GHIII. Admit it, we both can see it.
How about the fact that there is virtually no difference between Hard and Expert mode in GHIII? Or the fact that all the songs, as said before, pretty much suck. Maybe the fact that presentation DOES effect the game, since the lack of the vibrant colors in GHIII that GH and GHII had just made it depressing to look at.
GH4 is a huge jump from GHIII, yeah, about as much of a jump as Rock Band was from GHII. Actually, it’s about the exact same amount of a jump since GH4 is a carbon copy of Rock Band with garage band tossed in for kicks. Except it lacks that whole “not depressing looking” aspect of it.
Oooh, on Hard and Expert have no difference, lets call it the worst GH game. GHIII had an absolutely awesome track, best in any GH game. But now, we’re not talking about GHIII or Rock Band, we are talking about World Tour and Rock Band 2. Virtually the same, but World Tour just looks better at this point. A lot better. You can make up minor excuses to why GHIII is bad, or admit that you were wrong.
The fact is Neversoft sucks at making music games, and GHIII had the worst tracks ever.
Now if you want to lap up the shit they keep churning out and calling “Guitar Hero” now, which is basically Rock band but not as fun, go ahead. I’ll be playing a game with a decent setlist and an original idea that wasn’t jacked from some hacks who are only good for Tony Hawk games.
Did you even listen to what I said.
Yes, did you listen to what I said? Neversoft can’t make music games for shit. I guarantee you the track listing will suck and you’ll get bored of how tedious the song maker is in about a week.
But I guess you won’t have lost much, since you’ve basically bought a watered down carbon copy of Rock Band.
Have you seen the songs they have already confirmed? Why are you fucking complaning?
Michael Jackson, Linkin Park, Smashing Pumpkins, Foo Fighters, Sublime...
yep, just as I suspected, shitty-ass songs by shitty-ass bands.
It seems you conviniently left out Hendrix, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne and Muse :P
3 bands in a sea of shit (muse is horrible).
Yep, that makes me want to buy a $100 game.
None of this really matters, becos of downloadin studio songs, which you hav convenientli ignored
c yas nyway
RB2 has downloading songs too?
Wow, what, maybe 100 songs?
GH4 will have 100s of 1000s, if not millions to choose from.
You are correct Sean, some people will be so creative that they will make like exact replicas of songs, it will be great to download them because they will be free.
SILVERXXX wrote:
You are correct Sean, some people will be so creative that they will make like exact replicas of songs, it will be great to download them because they will be free.
Well Atresac got told off pretty bad, it was me, Dhem, and Sean owning him lol But seriously I dont mind peoples opinions but when people get arrogant and talk shit that is incorrect I step in
»
Games
» Rock Band 2 and Guitar Hero: World Tour Everlong Gameplay Comparison
But seriously I dont mind peoples opinions but when people get arrogant and talk shit that is incorrect I step in
