SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
Well assuming you have photoshop, you can look up tutorials on how to rip a render out of an image. Or you can ask for the help of somebody that’s not entering.
SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
Well assuming you have photoshop, you can look up tutorials on how to rip a render out of an image. Or you can ask for the help of somebody that’s not entering.
I know how to render I am just not that good at it yet. I tried to render an image today it took me about 10 hours then it messed up and I could not fix it.. o.o
I am not going to break the rules but, I know someone is going to, and is going to IM someone on MSN and chit chat about theirs..its obvious..
SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
Well assuming you have photoshop, you can look up tutorials on how to rip a render out of an image. Or you can ask for the help of somebody that’s not entering.
I know how to render I am just not that good at it yet. I tried to render an image today it took me about 10 hours then it messed up and I could not fix it.. o.o
I am not going to break the rules but, I know someone is going to, and is going to IM someone on MSN and chit chat about theirs..its obvious..
Well then if anything you can look at it at an opportunity to better your ability to make a render.
And yeah, it’s obvious people COULD share their sigs on AIM or something if winning a contest based around editing a picture in photoshop to look shiny and stuff on a forum site that hardly ranks on alexis if they really WANTED to, but we’re going on the assumption people will respect the honesty we’re trying to bring to the contest, as well as have something better to do with their time than try and cheat.
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
Well assuming you have photoshop, you can look up tutorials on how to rip a render out of an image. Or you can ask for the help of somebody that’s not entering.
I know how to render I am just not that good at it yet. I tried to render an image today it took me about 10 hours then it messed up and I could not fix it.. o.o
I am not going to break the rules but, I know someone is going to, and is going to IM someone on MSN and chit chat about theirs..its obvious..
Well then if anything you can look at it at an opportunity to better your ability to make a render.
And yeah, it’s obvious people COULD share their sigs on AIM or something if winning a contest based around editing a picture in photoshop to look shiny and stuff on a forum site that hardly ranks on alexis if they really WANTED to, but we’re going on the assumption people will respect the honesty we’re trying to bring to the contest, as well as have something better to do with their time than try and cheat.
This is MVC we are talking about, newbs and assholes.. need I say more..
SKITTLES666 wrote:
I was just stating my opinion, not my fault if I am the only one that thinks that. There are not as many renders for the images one may wont as you may think..
People on here already know other peoples sig styles and will continue to vote for that person because they can tell by the person sig style, like yours, treeplanter.
In my opinion, less people will enter the competition, and less people will vote, but that is just my two cents.
Well this is a trial of this new method. No saying it’s going to stay.
Yes, people can still vote for an easily-identified style, but just as easily people can mimic another’s style without anyone else knowing.
However, this new spin is by no means perfect, and we (being myself and Cid) hope that even though it’s fairly easy to bypass this new anonymity, people will go with the flow and play the game to actually be honest about what sig they find to be the best.
I’ll probably do this for another week or two after this (2-3 weeks in total) to see if the entries are less than what they have been.
I have no problem with the no names being posted part, its just the fact that half of the things I want rendered, are not a render already, and I am not the best at rendering, so it is going to be hard.
Well assuming you have photoshop, you can look up tutorials on how to rip a render out of an image. Or you can ask for the help of somebody that’s not entering.
I know how to render I am just not that good at it yet. I tried to render an image today it took me about 10 hours then it messed up and I could not fix it.. o.o
I am not going to break the rules but, I know someone is going to, and is going to IM someone on MSN and chit chat about theirs..its obvious..
Well then if anything you can look at it at an opportunity to better your ability to make a render.
And yeah, it’s obvious people COULD share their sigs on AIM or something if winning a contest based around editing a picture in photoshop to look shiny and stuff on a forum site that hardly ranks on alexis if they really WANTED to, but we’re going on the assumption people will respect the honesty we’re trying to bring to the contest, as well as have something better to do with their time than try and cheat.
This is MVC we are talking about, newbs and assholes.. need I say more..
Well we can’t stop them. But then again no rule can’t be bent if someone wanted to.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Maybe if there was a thread for the actual voting and a separate thread for discussion.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Tyrane wrote:
Just something I’d like to add that I don’t think has yet:
In some of the past SOTW voting threads it’s often turned into a big discussion and I remember before that one or two votes has been misplaced because of it. Maybe making it a rule to rid of off-topic chatter completely in there would make it more efficient. (If it hasn’t been thought of already, of course)
No. The off topic chatter in the entry thread is actually very, very useful. It keeps the thread on the main page, which means the competition will be getting more attention. If it was just stickied or something, so it’d be easy to find, then people would have to check the section to see that there’s a new SOTW competition. It’s less productive.
Maybe if there was a thread for the actual voting and a separate thread for discussion.
You still have the problem of the voting thread remaining off the front page, and thus loosing attention of voters. Though this does give me an idea...
»
Contests/Trivia
» SOTW#36 Pirates
