Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR (especially unequal ban). Tisk, tisk.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with YOU? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because YOU don’t agree with a debate does not give YOU any right to have YOUR way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, YOU’RE turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with you? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because you don’t agree with a debate does not give you any right to have your way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, you’re turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
You wanted to take it up with me from the beginning and I explained to you my half. You now demand more information about injustices and the rules, and I am simply telling you to take it to Bjarne. I had done what I felt was right, much else past that is beyond my voice.
As for me turning into an unjust Nazi, I would like to say that one action does not dictate the total of one’s character.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with you? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because you don’t agree with a debate does not give you any right to have your way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, you’re turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
You wanted to take it up with me from the beginning and I explained to you my half. You now demand more information about injustices and the rules, and I am simply telling you to take it to Bjarne. I had done what I felt was right, much else past that is beyond my voice.
As for me turning into an unjust Nazi, I would like to say that one action does not dictate the total of one’s character.
That was just a fancy way of admitting your inaccuracy of judgement. Good, now we’re gaining experience through behavioral modification. Next time, we should know better with clarity and certainty before making decisions as a moderator. Hmmm?
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with you? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because you don’t agree with a debate does not give you any right to have your way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, you’re turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
You wanted to take it up with me from the beginning and I explained to you my half. You now demand more information about injustices and the rules, and I am simply telling you to take it to Bjarne. I had done what I felt was right, much else past that is beyond my voice.
As for me turning into an unjust Nazi, I would like to say that one action does not dictate the total of one’s character.
That was just a fancy way of admitting your inaccuracy of judgement. Good, now we’re gaining experience through behavioral modification. Next time, we should know better with clarity and certainty before making decisions as a moderator. Hmmm?
I am not going to state to an absolute that what I did was completely right, as right and wrong are obviously subjective to opinions. I did what I felt and deemed was correct. People obviously may see this differently, so I did not state it as an absolute.
If you wish anything past that, as I stated before, talk to Bjarne about it, whether it be my demotion or a stern talking to.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with you? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because you don’t agree with a debate does not give you any right to have your way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, you’re turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
You wanted to take it up with me from the beginning and I explained to you my half. You now demand more information about injustices and the rules, and I am simply telling you to take it to Bjarne. I had done what I felt was right, much else past that is beyond my voice.
As for me turning into an unjust Nazi, I would like to say that one action does not dictate the total of one’s character.
That was just a fancy way of admitting your inaccuracy of judgement. Good, now we’re gaining experience through behavioral modification. Next time, we should know better with clarity and certainty before making decisions as a moderator. Hmmm?
I am not going to state to an absolute that what I did was completely right, as right and wrong are obviously subjective to opinions. I did what I felt and deemed was correct. People obviously may see this differently, so I did not state it as an absolute.
If you wish anything past that, as I stated before, talk to Bjarne about it, whether it be my demotion or a stern talking to.
Now why would I go and bother Bjarner when we can reach an agreement amongst ourselves? That’s undoubtedly nonsense for such a petty occurrence. I understand you acknowledge my point... Nothing more needs be said on this matter. Goodnight.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I did’nt see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and did’nt give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance.
I did warn you both several times beforehand. I told you you would be banned, obviously expecting you would read it as Cid read his message after I moderated it, yet you didn’t. Counting basis, and as I said, you got unlucky to not read the last number.
If you want to call other mods, fine. I basically told you how it would end if it came up again as Cid is on the last straw, but it’s up to you.
But you were referring to Cid on your last warning. I didn’t even see it until after I posted because the timing was close. So, WTF? It takes two to tango... Fair is fair, if you ban me for the same thing I guess you should take responsibility and make it an equal opportunity, otherwise, you’re just a biased moderator who made a bad decision. It’s time to rectify that decision in a fair manor. Ban that bitch for doing exactly as I or get me unbanned.
I quoted you on (nearly) every warning beforehand. Your warning was before Cid’s, and he saw his. If it starts up again such as that and Cid participates he will be the one being banned.
Plus, your ban was for a day, with knowledge that you can use alternate accounts.
Exactly, it’s just a day so ban Cid for “just a day”. He was warned and is guilty of the exact same thing as I. Cid was antagonizing with just as many post as I was. Besides, I Never saw any rules being broken from our argument. What the fuck did I get banned for and Cid not? Cid was making up bullshit about me and I was calling it out like it is as the truth. There was no flaming on my part.
You were both spewing out crap and continuing the whole thing. You accidentally stepped over the line, he stopped just before it, whatever, as long as it stops I don’t care. Just suffer on the account and if it happens again call it lucky cause you won’t be getting banned then, he will. And he might be getting it worse; that’s something I’m in debate over as of yet.
LMAO, Since when was “spewing out crap” against the rules? I’m sorry TR but I find no basis on a topic of, “what’s on your mind at the moment” that warrants a ban.
.......
Yip, I looked just looked through the rules again and I didn’t catch a “spewing out crap” rule. Yes there was a heated debate and we were going at it, but as far as I know, you can’t just go around warning people for nothing then banning them, TR. Tisk, tisk.
Take that up with Bjarne then.
How about I take it up with you? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because you don’t agree with a debate does not give you any right to have your way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, you’re turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
You wanted to take it up with me from the beginning and I explained to you my half. You now demand more information about injustices and the rules, and I am simply telling you to take it to Bjarne. I had done what I felt was right, much else past that is beyond my voice.
As for me turning into an unjust Nazi, I would like to say that one action does not dictate the total of one’s character.
That was just a fancy way of admitting your inaccuracy of judgement. Good, now we’re gaining experience through behavioral modification. Next time, we should know better with clarity and certainty before making decisions as a moderator. Hmmm?
I am not going to state to an absolute that what I did was completely right, as right and wrong are obviously subjective to opinions. I did what I felt and deemed was correct. People obviously may see this differently, so I did not state it as an absolute.
If you wish anything past that, as I stated before, talk to Bjarne about it, whether it be my demotion or a stern talking to.
Now why would I go and bother Bjarner when we can reach an agreement amongst ourselves? That’s undoubtedly nonsense for such a petty occurrence. I understand you acknowledge my point... Nothing more needs be said on this matter. Goodnight.
Well, you did state me as turning into a Nazi dictator, would that not be cause for concern with higher powers? I believe it would, myself.
Tyrane wrote:
Call it an unmeasured counting system. He’s at the last straw, you just got unlucky enough to make the one comment to put you just past it.
I also would like to note it was warningS, not warning.
Bullshit! Fair is fair! He needs a ban, he’s just a guilty as I am. Don’t be biased now, TR.
Ain’t being biased. I warned you by your post, and told him within his post to drop it; post for post. Your post afterward caused your ban. Basically your “count” is reset, his isn’t, so if it ends up starting again you know how it’ll end, besides fairly quickly.
I didn’t see the last warning because I was typing my message. You edited his message and didn’t give him a ban after we were both warned equally. However, I never got that chance. Ban him now or I will call upon other mods who are more level headed and fair.
Zucas:the mod of the future
Oh I know Zucas can see my side but Firewolf and Dante will likely see a justice has gone unfairly deserved.
Eh? I would have banned both of you for being whiney little bitches.
But I wasn’t on to witness all the drama and as Tr has done his job as moderator, in banning someone if not both of you, I see no reason to interviene.
How about I take it up with YOU? Perhaps YOU should think about the rules before throwing around warnings and bans. Just because YOU don’t agree with a debate does not give YOU any right to have YOUR way whenever YOU think it’s necessary. Damn, YOU’RE turning into an unjust Nazi, TR. What’s going on? Are you having troubles at home? Girl troubles? Depression? Hmmm?
I swear, it’s like a soap opera between you two. It won’t end till y’all either shake hands, kiss and make up(Obviously not. That would be very odd :|), or till one, or both of you die(And when I say die, I mean getting banned/permabanned/etc).
Darth Nihilus wrote:
I swear, it’s like a soap opera between you two. It won’t end till y’all either shake hands, kiss and make up(obviously not. That would be very odd :|), or till one, or both of you die(and when I say dying, I mean getting banned/permabanned/etc).
Well, I’ve offered a hand of friendship 2 or 3 times in the past. He just keeps knocking it away. So I gave up. But I think this is going to end soon. He’ll end up permabanned if he doesn’t learn how to shut up. haha
»
Off-Topic
» LMAO Just as I was about to post this...
Haha
