Sony PS3 vs. Xbox 360 vs. Nintendo Wii

cant wait for PS3

Guest

Okay, I have said it before and I will say it again. All Nintendo gaming Systems SUCK. And anyone who plays them are pricks who don’t deserve to have a gaming counsel. I’ll give you some reasons.
1. They are way behind Microsoft and Sony
2. There games are shi**y a lot have to do with mario.
3. There design is crap
4. They are shit
PS3 is definately the best it has a sleek design and has a lot of features plus the GTA games are for them and they F***ing rule. It is an awsome counci.
Now XBOX 360 looks cool and I liked the XBOX although I will never be able to aford it after I buy my PS3. But if Halo 3 comes out I can always play it on my friends Xbox 360 because I’m absolutly positive he will buy it.

learyan

Guest

tseeee!

ps3 and xbox 360 are so great

nin revolotion sucks!

but revolution could run faster than xbox360 without hang, freeeze!revolution have any thing from ps3 games but not all! but it seeems to me that rev is better than xbox 360!

but 4 me the best grafix! ps3!

becozzz! since i was children i have ps1

and now i have ps2 the flat one

nxt yrs im going to have ps3

im so addicted ps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 1



Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 3,265
OFFLINE

first of all “cant wait for ps3” u say that nintendo is behind xbox and sony?
hahaha dont make me laugh

so is that why nintendo ditched the playstation idea?...yeah u heard me nintendo was gonna team up with sony and make a device for the snes that could play 32 bit discs but since nintendo ditched that idea sony took that idea and turned it into a console...but nintendo decided to make somthing better called the n64 which had better graphics no loading and better games one of them being the top selling games of all time Zelda oot.

and then nintendo makes this thing called the rumble pack that makes the controller vibrate when u get hit or when u hit somthin and so on and so on. guess who steals that idea? yup sony then later on xbox uses it too.

what about wireless controlers? yup nintendo thought of that first and every one copyed.

oh and what about the set up for the buttons on ps1 2 and xbox? i think ive seen that button set up somwhere before...oh yeah that is the snes set up.

oh didnt sony come out with a game called dark cloud with a charactor strikingly similer to link from legend of zelda? yup and everyone called it the poor mans zelda and then wind waker cane out with cell shaded graphics and what did sony do? they made another dark cloud game with cell shaded graphics.

now nintendo makes a handheld with a touch screen now i bet that will get stolen some time soon.

and the gamecubes graphics are 2 times better than ps2.


im pretty sure nintendo is leading the industry

and not lagging behind.

get some facts next time

Regular
Rep: 0

Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
OFFLINE

actually, the PS2 GPU is more powerful than GCs

arthur

Guest

Let me end this argument, PS3 vs XBOX 360(not enough info on the revolution, but ive found out its going to have a revoloutionary controller, with touch like the DS)!

1.PS3
2.360

People are judgeing the consoles power from E3, well you shouldn’t, PS3 was running at 65% of its real performance, which means it was only running at 2.4GHZ (sources-Famitsu Maganize)Roumers have emerge and these roumers have been backed up by ken kutaragi SCE that the playstation will be running 4.0GHZ on the final product and the reason they didnt want to reveal this at E3 is because they wanted to blow of the heat that if they didnt produce sumthing with 4.0GHZ they wouled be shunned as under acheiving!
XBOX 360.....Whats this bullshit that live is going to be a revoloution! If i want a gaming machine, thats what im going to buy, not something that has games like Kameo on floorstock! I dont give a crap on how the console looks (360 has changable face plates)I want something that can give me the most realistic gaming experience! And All this crap about live, PS3 is going to have a little thing called a 80gb hard drive and have another thing called playstation world! PS world is going to be apparently better than Live because
1. Its free
2. All the extra levels and weapons depending on what game is free.
3. All systems hav it in-built and it runs on a program that sony hasnt announced yet!
4. Media transfer online and everything live can do +more!
People are saying a psp can connect to the 360, J allard XBOX PRODUCTION MANAGER even revealed it at E3, Ken kutaragi came back to that and said if xbox creates anything that can decode the wifi connection the psp produces to make it connect to the 360 PS is going to sue! J Allard has got to be one of the dumbest people ive seen!
PS3 Specs kill the xbox, PS3-2.0 Teraflops XBOX-1.3 Teraflops, Thats some serious processing power difference, PS3 IS GOING TO BE BETTER THAN xbox360 BUT I CANNOT COMMENT ON THE REVOLOUTION-IM LOOKING FOWARD TO THE REVOLOUTION!!! but ps3 is better!!!!

begging

Guest

I really hope that English is not your first language. It seemed as though you had a good argument. However, any point you had was lost between your brain and the keyboard. I could not decipher half of your post. Please, study harder.

Regular
Rep: 0

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 180
OFFLINE

OMG there are some dumb people on this thread!

arthur, there is no proof of either console being more powerful than the other, so you can stop with your bullshit opinions. Also, you say PS is going to sue if X360 can connect to PSP? You obviously made that up, seeing as PSP uses existing wireless technology, i.e. wireless a/b/g, which is of course what X360 will be using.

Wx5H, where’s your proof that PS2’s GPU is more powerful than GC’s? I don’t know if that’s true, but I think it’s very unlikely. Just look at the graphics of Resident Evil 4. There is no way PS2 could handle graphics like that.

cant wait for PS3, you are a total dumbass! You clearly don’t know the difference between a reason and an opinion. “They are shit” is not a reason. Get a fucking clue!

arthur

Guest

I am Greek, English is my second language, give me a break, PS3 proccessing power will be more powerful and faster, i work for SCEG (SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT GREECE) So dont tell me shit about things you have no clue about! It is true GC has more speed and power than PS2, and i have to admit that the only reason PS2 made it big is because it was released out first! We have just recieved our alpha kits, which run 3.6-4.2GHZ, So there is a signifacant speed and power difference between the PS3 and X360! 80 GIG hard drive will be sold separatly thus decreasing the price of the PS3! A buisness plan from sony to make one of the 8 spes faulty to reduce the price drasticaly has been confirmed, the only reason they are doing this is because 1 of the spes is not needed!

ahunterslayer

Guest

xbox 360 is going to win

ahunterslayer

Guest

xbox 360 1,ps3 2,nintendo whater 3,

Brain

Guest

Arthur you are an idiot. Yes ther is a significant difference between the processing power of the 360 and PS3. The 360 has three times the genreal processing power of the PS3. And why is sony selling the hardrive separate. What a rip off MEmory cards blow, and is this hard drive even detachable?

Brain

Guest

Also, people claiming that PS3 has better graphics are complete morons. Your proof. “uhhhh...why CGI movies and supposed GPU power, Brain." says a stupid PS fanboy. I then smacked him in the face and had my way with his mother. That is just plain stupid. The graphics shown of real in gameplay footage of MS games at E3 were “one third of the finished product” HAve you seen the new PGR3 screens at ign.com. Fucking ridiculous. Oh and the PS3 GPu is less powerful thn the 360’s. The PS3 GPU is based off of the g70 coming out later this year, whereas the custom ATi chip designed speficially for the system, no chip to rival its poer will be out until 2007. MMM MMM Bitch!

DuX

Guest

What u guys dont understand is that this a repeat of what happened last gen. Nintendo finds that there console is not as powerfull as sony or microsoft. So they turn it into a buget console. That is how nintendo kept sales. If they didn’t do this then they would have gone broke. This is going to happen again. So basicly the battle is between Xbox and PS3.


Well the xbox 360 is gunna have a 20 gig HDD as i herd. It’s sad because PS3 as i understand is going to use blue ray technolagy. That king o disk can hold 20 - 40 gigs depending on what ones u buy. The Xbox 360 is using some HD dvd that is like our duel layer dvd’s. As for online. PS3 will have free online. I used it on my PS2 and thats all i play. online activity will determin who wins this battle. And i aint paying premium prices for X box live when I can get the same service for free.

O and might I point out that the xbox 360 is gunna bottleneck just like its predisessor. And the only thing that can fix it is a well configured game. And u might wana know my computer is already more powerfull then the x-box 360 and then some.

In the end the battle has a clear winner. PS3

Im sorry nintendo fans but you have to make the transition to somthing else. Nintendo is dying as sega did. And you dont want a console that doesn’t have games do you?

Regular
Rep: 0

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 180
OFFLINE

Quote from Dux: “my computer is already more powerfull then the x-box 360 and then some”

Bullshit! There is no graphics card availiable today that can hope to match the power of the X360’s GPU, not even dual 7800 SLi. And, the Xbox 360 CPU is at least 50% more powerful than the best dual core AMD processor. Keep dreaming pal. You won’t be able to get a PC with the power of X360 until way after it comes out. Just out of interest, what is the spec of your PC? It would be funny if it is in fact shit, and you just made that up. Also, Blu-ray won’t give PS3 any advantage. It will be far too expensive, and HD-DVD can hold up to 25GB, way more than enough until Xbox 3 and PS4.

Another dumbass quote: “Nintendo finds that there console is not as powerfull as sony or microsoft”. Actually, the gamecube is far more powerful than PS2, but not as powerful as Xbox. It is in between. The reason they lowered the price is because immature people like you wouldn’t buy it because all your sad little friends would think you’ve turned gay.

Get a clue dumbass! And you arthur! If you work for Sony then you should know what you’re talking about, but you clearly don’t.

DuX

Guest

Omg man theny only putting in a 3 ghz prosessor. And even that is to intel standards o and that sli billshit is false. As in the past Xbox swaped their more expensive P3 prosessor or a celeron. So go milk a stick to the goats you peace of shit. And if wat i said is false then howcome they already have Xbox 360 emulators. Not common but they have them out. Even befor the japan release. And befor you call wat i say bullshit remember who’s ass u came out of.

PS3 addict
Rep: 26



Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 14,881
OFFLINE

Bluray will give the PS3 an advantage.

1.Bluray has more storage 23gb/27gb/50gb/100gb
2.HD-DVD 15gb/30gb/45gb(but Xbox 360 uses 9gb Dual layer DVD).

3.Bluray has faster access times over 50gb/s(thats faster than a hard drive).
4.HD-DVD is 30gb/s and DL DVD is about 15gb/s.

nintendorevolution

Guest

Ok all you Xbox faggits, im tired of your bitchin, so im gonna set things strait!

PS3 will have the best Graphics!

Overall, all the GPU’s are equal. Before you counter what im saying, get some info!

PS3 will not have 1-core processer, the cell will have 8 SPE’s, wich run exactly like cores. this mean that it van handle 8 directions, unlike xbox 360 wich can only run 3 directions. Nintendo revolution will have 4 cores, but they run at 700mhz slower than xbox 360, so overall xbox 360 and revolution will have the same processing power, but ps3 will have the best!

PS: those who say a better processer does not effect graphics knows NOTHING about computers.

Regular
Rep: 0

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 180
OFFLINE

Look Dux, get your facts sorted for a start, it’ll save you the embarrassment. Xbox 360 will have 3 cores running at 3.2GHz each, not just one 3Ghz! I said tell me your PC’s specs, then I can prove it’s not as powerful as Xbox 360. What’s this shit about Xbox using a Celeron? And if there are Xbox 360 emulators out there, they simply won’t function for a long time. You need a far more powerful PC than the console you are trying to emulate. Here’s an example: The N64 had only 4MB of RAM, and N64 emulators recommend at least 128MB. See the difference? And of course you need more than that with XP. I say again, get a clue.

Regular
Rep: 0

Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 180
OFFLINE

nintendorevolution, I have never seen someone contratict themselves in two sentences like you just did: “PS3 will have the best Graphics! Overall, all the GPU’s are equal." OMG you are dumb. And besides, no one knows if the GPU’s are equal, or which has more power, because they simply aren’t comparable yet. PS3 isn’t finished. And from the rest of your post, it’s clear that you know nothing about CPU arcitecture. How many dumbasses can there be in one thread?

nintendorevolution

Guest

Your a such a dumbass, some1! Nvidias 7800(g70) has been released, so now everyone nows ps3’s gpu specs! Microsoft is such a loud mouth, everyone nows there spec already! Nintendo revoluton spec can bee pieced together by the leaking info on the net! Im like the revolution the most, but its Ps3 cell processer bu toshiba and IBM than gives itt the edge! moron. no one can be sure the of the EXACT specs of each console until its released, so you just inslted all the people on this thread that have a good idea of what the nextgen sonceoles specs are.