| 09 Jun 2005 01:36 pm |
Scorpion-scum Guest | FYI: HE DOESN’T HAVE ANYMORE MONEY!!! 
| |
 |
| 09 Jun 2005 04:13 pm |
drpoodle Guest | INNOCENT! without a shadow of a doubt, there is no reliable eveidence against him. the arviso family have a history of blackmailing celebrities for money, and they have taken it way too far!
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 04:26 pm |
jocelyn Guest | MICHAEL IS INNOCENT!! EVERYONE NEEDS TO SHUT UP AND QUIT HATING ON HIM! THOSE LITTLE KIDS JUST WANT HIS MONEY! HE IS AN INNOCENT MAN! I LOVE MICHAEL!
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 04:43 pm |
Marty Guest | Verdict shortly/I say innocent also
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 04:58 pm |
Wannabe Rep: 0 Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Posts: 79 OFFLINE | He’s guilty of being a bad singer, but I’d say he’s innocent of whatever it is everone’s accusing him of. I wish they’d stop talking about it on TV and get on with some real news.
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 04:59 pm |
Marty Guest | Scorpion-scum - Course he does he owns 50% of all The Beatles songs,as well as Bob Dylan.He’s not skint by no means.
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 05:21 pm |
Marty Guest | verdict - not guilty on all ten counts - he’s a free man.
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 05:42 pm |
KidRomeo Guest | HA HA HA!!!!!!!!! HIS JUST RIGHTLY BEEN PROVEN INNOCENT, NO DOUBT HE IS INNOCENT!!! FU*K YOU ALL THAT THOUGHT HE WAS GUILTY JUST BECAUSE HE IS SUCCESSFUL AND LOVES KIDS PEOPLE THINK THAT THEY CAN WRONGLY EXPLOIT HIS FEELING FOR THEIR OWN GOOD! HOPE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO SUE HIM GET WHAT IS COMING TO THEM!!!!!!!
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 06:18 pm |
elizabeth Guest | He was just proven INOCENT EWWW EWWW EWWW EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!
| |
| 13 Jun 2005 06:33 pm |
fcukit Guest | U know the only reason he got off was because the Beckams gave him the Alibi he needed.....!
“They said he was in Brooklyn at the time”!!
Oh well there u go,don’t matter what anyone thinks - they all get off, just like that F***ing B****** O.J Simpson - may god speak and fry their Ass in hell.
| |
| 14 Jun 2005 02:38 am |
screamingtrees Guest | id say he’s innocent really cuz theres nothing that proves him guilty...ppl are like oh fuck this fuck that he’s guilty as sin and stuff but realley u ask the person can they prove he’s guilty and really they dont have any real proof that he is.... no doubt ppl will b like fuck u man hes guilty man hes guilty but i dont find a real reason why he is guilty so im gunna say innocent....when ppl find a person who looks,acts,and talks weird they find it easy to point the finger at them and say oh he’s a freak turned white...let’s call him a pedo, he didnt do nything to you, so why say stuff about him....if he got/gets proven guilty....then u may freely pay him out...you can always have your say but just try and put....“i think..." before blasting “hes guilty he raped them!!!" and everything because really he didnt “get-off-the-hook”...he was found innocent...and until he gets actually PROVEN guilty,he is innocent
| |
| 14 Jun 2005 04:51 am |
fcukit Guest | well said screamingtrees - but they were wrong bout O.J weren’t they although he got off. And later evidence was found that linked him 110% to the murder. But M.J is a neat guye - a genius of music and dance,don’t get me wrong I don’t give a f*** about his colour, looks or anything, people do not deserve to be judged us/him on these terms and basics.....he’s out, so cool, Ruind in mind and soul - poor chap.
| |
| 15 Jun 2005 04:18 pm |
Vampyre Guest | Michael Jack-asson is friggen guilty, but he got off scott free because he’s a celebrity. Celebrity’s get away with murder. They suck.
| |
| 15 Jun 2005 05:11 pm |
Kristen Guest | I personally can’t stand MJ he creeps me out soooo bad & i think he is 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000% guilty but that’s just my opinion
| |
| 15 Jun 2005 05:21 pm |
physco Guest | THATS IN THE NAME OF PETER GRIFFON THATS FREAKIN SWEET!!!!!!! BUT SEROSULY I THINK HE S GUILTY
| |
| 15 Jun 2005 08:09 pm |
DestinyGuy 678 Guest | i think he innocent they didnt have any evidencwe and a lot loop holes with the witnesses
| |
| 20 Jun 2005 09:38 pm |
HALOBOSS Guest | on a scale of 1-10, how old is micheals boyfreind?
| |
| 21 Jun 2005 10:56 am |
TheElric Brothers Guest | Guilty! Come on just look at him he’d do anything lookin like that.
But in all honesty I do belive he’s innocent and the whole thing just started as bad joke somewhere and the some money hungry/publicity hungry freaks decided to put him on trial, just cause he looks like a freak.Then again I don’t know the trial history very well.
| |
| 21 Jun 2005 12:38 pm |
Regular Rep: 0Joined: 13 Apr 2005 Posts: 219 OFFLINE | I don’t think he ever did anything with the kids, but he admitted to sharing a bed with seven years olds who he hardly knew.
If your average Joe next door neighbour was sharing beds with young boys people would be putting bricks through his window. There would be fucking demonstrations outside his house, but because Michael is famous everyone loves him. It’s fucking ridiculous.
I do feel sorry for the guy though, it’s obvious that he needs some sort of help.
| |
| 21 Jun 2005 06:41 pm |
Michael Jackson Guest | you stupid pieces of shit! im not guilty! now if youll excuse me, im going to go rape- i mean... visit some children! ta-ta!
| |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Off-Topic
» Is Michael Jackson Innocent Or Guilty?
