| 29 Jul 2005 01:53 am |
Homo Sapient Guest | if god is a man, then shouldnt he have a wife and parents? and if he has parents then they have parents and they have parents....so who is GOD?
| |
 |
| 29 Jul 2005 01:57 am |
Regular Rep: 0  Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 744 OFFLINE | that is one of ur wisest forums, its true he must have a mum and dad
---
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 02:41 am |
Homo Sapient Guest | now im wise huh?
but yeh, anyone dare to challenge the illogic of it?
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:06 am |
Regular Rep: 0Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 185 OFFLINE | since when was god a man??
Jesus was god in human form therefore god isnt a man.. the only way I can think of you getting confused is how he created man in his own image.. that doesnt mean we are god and he is us.. just means we look like him.
God by definition is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient.
The fact that he is omnipresent implies that he doesnt have a begining or and end as he is everywhere all at once in every time etc
Its something we cannot percieve as god is supposedly on a higher plane of existence than ours... think next dimension sort of thing.
As he never had a start or a finish he couldnt have had parents.
Also god isnt a material being like we know one to be, he’s more of a presence, as he is everywhere at once, he cant really have corporeal form as he would be everywhere so he would be existence if you catch my drift.
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:09 am |
Lara Guest | but there are angels and demons and satan and all that shit who wouldve met god and seen him and talked to him especially angels. like if you beleve jesus was god in body form and an angel visited them, whats an angel look like? a human. and like u say, god created man in his own image so god is a man.
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:22 am |
Regular Rep: 0Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 185 OFFLINE | he is everywhere at once... but he can still take form.. and look like a man but still be everywhere else at the same time..
just because he looks like us doesnt make him us... in his own IMAGE.. not his own design
and as a presence he can still talk to people or angels or whatever and he can take form
but if he did have parents he wouldnt be what he is.. omnipresent, omniscient or omnipotent.
therefore your idea is flawed.. if you think it was a valid idea dont you think that someone else would have considered it?
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:26 am |
Lara Guest | im confooosed. lol.
but if he created reproductie organs in all creatures then whered he get that idea? i think reproductivity is what started the universe and everything
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:34 am |
Regular Rep: 0Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 185 OFFLINE | he is omniscient.. meaning all knowing..
he knows everything and anything.. all that has been and all that will be.. he knows perfection.. he knows the solution for every problem
also if you remember angels which are a closer representation of god dont have a reproductive system.. the are 'sexless' and are all created as individuals with no parents, they are just themselves.
so if angels have no parents it would be a stupid idea to suggest god has them
| |
| 29 Jul 2005 09:36 am |
Lara Guest | wel i dunno i cant argue with u bout all that u r smarter than me lol
| |
|
Post Reply |
First ]
»
Off-Topic
» if god is a man then he must have a mother....yes?
