| 19 Jul 2007 02:33 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
Dude, your the one using propaganda by taking stuff out of context. *cough* hypocrite
You just said your own post I’m using is propaganda. Dumbass.
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:33 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54 Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,088 OFFLINE | Tyreaus wrote:
Zucas wrote:
TR and Fucky- I commend you for trying but once again go to my brick wall analogy. Ya just can’t get through to such idiocy and stubborness and all the other things he is.
Eh, I don’t think of it that way, and it’s something to do.
I guess.
 
  | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:35 pm |
Nevae Anariva Rep: 49 Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 9,975 | the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
 | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:36 pm |
Banned Rep: 51 Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
Dude, your the one using propaganda by taking stuff out of context. *cough* hypocrite
You just said your own post I’m using is propaganda. Dumbass.
oh 21, your hurting me again.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:36 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
No, his post was saying the world would be better without it.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:37 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
Dude, your the one using propaganda by taking stuff out of context. *cough* hypocrite
You just said your own post I’m using is propaganda. Dumbass.
oh 21, your hurting me again.
Don’t believe you.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:38 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,088 OFFLINE | We know you wouldn’t. You don’t believe anyone but yourself. ---
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:39 pm |
Nevae Anariva Rep: 49Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 9,975 | the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
No, his post was saying the world would be better without it.
Maybe it would be, that’s a topic for religious debate, not discrimination.
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:39 pm |
Banned Rep: 51Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
Dude, your the one using propaganda by taking stuff out of context. *cough* hypocrite
You just said your own post I’m using is propaganda. Dumbass.
oh 21, your hurting me again.
Don’t believe you.
Believe it. All these insults and trying to get people to think I’m discriminating is really hurting me. Still referencing your sig and custom rank BTW.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:40 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | And you believe everybody. I just don’t believe discriminating jerks. ---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:41 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,088 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
No, his post was saying the world would be better without it.
Which isn’t discriminating. He’s saying hypothetically in his opinion he thinks the world would be better without religion as the bad outweighs the good.
If someone where to come in and say hypothetically in their opinion they think the world is a better place with religion cause they feel the good outweights the bad would we all of a sudden call them discriminatory against Matt’s opinions. No. That’s cause there is no discrimination just opinions. Matt said nothing discriminatory and neither did I. Actually my religion for better or worse actually shows that I looked at both sides and then came to a conclusion. That doesn’t make me discriminating. It means I have an opinion.
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:42 pm |
Nevae Anariva Rep: 49Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 9,975 | Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
No, his post was saying the world would be better without it.
Which isn’t discriminating. He’s saying hypothetically in his opinion he thinks the world would be better without religion as the bad outweighs the good.
If someone where to come in and say hypothetically in their opinion they think the world is a better place with religion cause they feel the good outweights the bad would we all of a sudden call them discriminatory against Matt’s opinions. No. That’s cause there is no discrimination just opinions. Matt said nothing discriminatory and neither did I. Actually my religion for better or worse actually shows that I looked at both sides and then came to a conclusion. That doesn’t make me discriminating. It means I have an opinion.
Much better than I put it. 
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:42 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 40,088 OFFLINE | Oh thx. ---
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:44 pm | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:50 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
I bet if someone came in saying the world is better with religion then 21 wouldn’t consider it discrimination.
If he said only religion then yes.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:51 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Tyreaus wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
I’m not making peace with people that make discriminatory comments about how 'religion should die' and are serious about it.
Im going to say this, and please dont take it the wrong way, but what ram said was more in line with John Lennon, not hitler. My explanation: he said the world would be better without religion, not that theists are scum of the earth and should be eradicated. Im not taking sides, it’s just how I took it.
Nope, sounds more like a pre-Hitler to me.
Well, you’re reading it wrong, because everyone else sees it differently.
No, I’m not. It doesn’t matter if it’s hypothetically or not. Discrimination should not be allowed.
What if somebody said “the world would be better of without white people” because white people supposedly caused the most damage with slavery?
Excatly.
It’s not discrimination, it’s a hypothetical situation. Zucas was only quoting Ramunematt on what he might say if he was wanting a holocaust, everything was completly hypothetical.
Hypothetical shit. Two discriminatory jerks.
I’ll back off when they stop their shit about how 'the world would better without religion'.
Fucking discrimination.
There isn’t any discrimination. I can’t explain it to you in any other way that you would believe other than that it was hypothetical. If you don’t wish to believe me, you don’t have to, but that doesn’t make them guilty.
They’re guilty. Ram just worded his discriminatory post nicely so a world without religion would sound great. It’s called propaganda.
ramunematt wrote:
Personally I think the world would be a much better place without religion. No delusions, no killing or suffering in the name of religion, more enthusiasm towards science, no fundamentalists or extremists, no psychological damage from being told at an early age you will suffer forever if you aren’t good, I could go on and on.
It’s his personal beliefs. To an extent, I halfly agree with him, as he has some good points, and I’m not an atheist.
I don’t give a damn. I hate discrimination.
He’s not discriminating, he’s posting his beliefs. Discriminating would be like “all Christians are idiots because they believe in God” or something...his statement was looking at the negatives of religion and the problems it has caused, not the good things, regardless of that, it’s not discrimination.
No, his post was saying the world would be better without it.
Which isn’t discriminating. He’s saying hypothetically in his opinion he thinks the world would be better without religion as the bad outweighs the good.
If someone where to come in and say hypothetically in their opinion they think the world is a better place with religion cause they feel the good outweights the bad would we all of a sudden call them discriminatory against Matt’s opinions. No. That’s cause there is no discrimination just opinions. Matt said nothing discriminatory and neither did I. Actually my religion for better or worse actually shows that I looked at both sides and then came to a conclusion. That doesn’t make me discriminating. It means I have an opinion.
Opinions can be discriminatory. Nazi’s thinking Jews were inferior was their opinion.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
Last edited 19 Jul 2007 02:53 pm by the21gamer | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:52 pm |
Banned Rep: 51Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,805 OFFLINE | I still don’t see how you view it as discrimination. If you are the only one who thinks it’s discrimination, then your most likely the one who’s wrong. ---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:54 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | And most everybody during the creation of the Constitution did not see slavery as wrong. ---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | | 19 Jul 2007 02:56 pm | | | 19 Jul 2007 02:57 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | And that was changed because everybody realized slavery was wrong.
Now you need to realize your discrimination is wrong. ---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
|
»
Religion
» Calling all atheists...
