I don’t think it’s too complicated, and I do like it anonymous. But I do realize there’s more steps involved...making it more challenging for some members
Either way.
About the whole anonymous thing, you can usually tell who made what sig. Just to make it better, the sig makers should make a sig using brushes that they rarely ever use so they won’t be so out there.
Darth Nihilus wrote:
About the whole anonymous thing, you can usually tell who made what sig. Just to make it better, the sig makers should make a sig using brushes that they rarely ever use so they won’t be so out there.
I think that’s going a bit overkill. It’s giving a handicap to the artists only for the sake of anonymity. You would have to change some people’s styles completely and, usually, they have a style because it’s what fits them the most.
Darth Nihilus wrote:
About the whole anonymous thing, you can usually tell who made what sig. Just to make it better, the sig makers should make a sig using brushes that they rarely ever use so they won’t be so out there.
I think that’s going a bit overkill. It’s giving a handicap to the artists only for the sake of anonymity. You would have to change some people’s styles completely and, usually, they have a style because it’s what fits them the most.
Also, bump.
Yes, I know, but it also shows which sig is made by whom, just because of what style they use most of the time. There’s nothing wrong with thinking out of the box.