Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,338
OFFLINE
ConanUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38
Two epic movies, two bad ass characters.

vs.

__________________

Last edited 24 Jan 2009 11:41 am by Conan
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 8,895
OFFLINE
jomasthe viking!
Rep: 58
maximus in a one on one fight
but in a team battle leonidas
__________________



Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,338
OFFLINE
ConanUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38
jomas the grunt wrote:
maximus in a one on one fight
but in a team battle leonidas
Yeah, Spartan’s are too good for Maximus’s gladiators. But Maximus beat Commodus after getting stabbed in the lung. So he could probably beat Leonidas.
__________________

Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
jomas the grunt wrote:
maximus in a one on one fight
but in a team battle leonidas
explain
The Sentry wrote:
jomas the grunt wrote:
maximus in a one on one fight
but in a team battle leonidas
Yeah, Spartan’s are too good for Maximus’s gladiators. But Maximus beat Commodus after getting stabbed in the lung. So he could probably beat Leonidas.
erm...no. Your logic doesn’t even make any sense.
The spartns fought for 3 days of 300 Spartans, which was the main force along with 6 thousand other soldiers (more like civilians) against over a million warriors..
Leo wins this fairly easily, especially since these guys are hardcore. Much more so then Max.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 25,491
OFFLINE
Hayliashay u gais lol
Rep: 87
Maximus had a Roman Army. :3
But in a one v one fight I would say Maximus due to the fact he has armour and Lenoidas fights without.
__________________

Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Maximus had a Roman Army. :3
But in a one v one fight I would say Maximus due to the fact he has armour and Lenoidas fights without.
Your logic is...dumb.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 25,491
OFFLINE
Hayliashay u gais lol
Rep: 87
Hedatary wrote:
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Maximus had a Roman Army. :3
But in a one v one fight I would say Maximus due to the fact he has armour and Lenoidas fights without.
Your logic is...dumb.
How so? They are more or less equal in fighting skill and strategy yet I would favour Maximus as he is better protected.
__________________

Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
What makes you think Max is even close to the level of Leo? Explain.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 25,491
OFFLINE
Hayliashay u gais lol
Rep: 87
Maximus mostly fought hand to hand without his allies support (and the one v one with the Emperor), Leonidas was always right by his allies in Phalanaxs (sp?). Also the Spartans were not out in an open battlefield, they were in a very narrow pass so that it was literally equal.
__________________

Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 550
OFFLINE
G-LadRegular
Rep: 7
I’m going to go with leo too, Spartan’s didn’t wear as much armour as other armies as they didn’t want to lose any speed or flexibility.
Spartans were trained since a young age and even sent into the wild to fend for themselves. I must admit max is a good strategist but 1 on 1 he will lose badly in both the strength and speed department and sheer combat effectiveness.
Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Maximus mostly fought hand to hand without his allies support (and the one v one with the Emperor), Leonidas was always right by his allies in Phalanaxs (sp?). Also the Spartans were not out in an open battlefield, they were in a very narrow pass so that it was literally equal.
Your logic...once again is dumb. No offense. There is a reason why Spartans were considered some of the best worriers throughout history. They live and breath battle.
The fact that they were fighting as a unit against a million in a narrow path way shows us that he knows more about battle and wars then max.
Max however is a complete amateur next to leo and with soldiers who only know how to swing a sword.
And the fact that the Spartans DON’T wear armor is because they already HAVE a semi perfect defense, which gives more protection then any Armour could. Not to mention the freedom of mobility.
Exactly how much do you know about this? I don’t think you know much at all.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 25,491
OFFLINE
Hayliashay u gais lol
Rep: 87
The near perfect defence is a phalanx, and if a Spartan was caught out of that defence mechanism he would be cut down within seconds. And the Roman Army only knows how to swing a sword? Right.
__________________

Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
Crimson_Blade wrote:
The near perfect defence is a phalanx, and if a Spartan was caught out of that defence mechanism he would be cut down within seconds. And the Roman Army only knows how to swing a sword? Right.
....
Lets put it this way.
Who wins this one?
The Persians (over a million) vs Max and his armies (over how many?)
Who wins this? Oh and btw, this takes place by the same terrain where the Spartans battled.
You answer this.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 550
OFFLINE
G-LadRegular
Rep: 7
We are not talking army on army we are talking one on one each get back to main topic - what defines a fight is both experience and skill both which leo has more of combined with strenth and speed i don’t see how max is going to win.
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 25,491
OFFLINE
Hayliashay u gais lol
Rep: 87
Hedatary wrote:
Crimson_Blade wrote:
The near perfect defence is a phalanx, and if a Spartan was caught out of that defence mechanism he would be cut down within seconds. And the Roman Army only knows how to swing a sword? Right.
....
Lets put it this way.
Who wins this one?
The Persians (over a million) vs Max and his armies (over how many?)
Who wins this? Oh and btw, this takes place by the same terrain where the Spartans battled.
You answer this.
They would hold out for longer than Leonidas did. There were more of them and they are extremely well trained in fighting armies which are not trained like they were.
But yes we are going off topic.
__________________

Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,086
OFFLINE
HedataryUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 21
Crimson_Blade wrote:
Hedatary wrote:
Crimson_Blade wrote:
The near perfect defence is a phalanx, and if a Spartan was caught out of that defence mechanism he would be cut down within seconds. And the Roman Army only knows how to swing a sword? Right.
....
Lets put it this way.
Who wins this one?
The Persians (over a million) vs Max and his armies (over how many?)
Who wins this? Oh and btw, this takes place by the same terrain where the Spartans battled.
You answer this.
They would hold out for longer than Leonidas did. There were more of them and they are extremely well trained in fighting armies which are not trained like they were.
But yes we are going off topic.
Wrong. You have to consider the phycological problems of each individuals of the army of Max’s. The fact that they are fighting against an army of over a million, there morals would plummant. Depression would set in and the freedom to flee from death, half the army would run away.
This would basically condemn the army to an inevitable death.
__________________
Cid wrote:
shit! Fine i’ll tell you! i kinda...play with my self looking at hentai porn xD
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,338
OFFLINE
ConanUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38
Maximus beat Commudos (who sparred against half a dozen guys at once in the freezing cold and no shirt on) with his lung punctured by a knife.
FYI, Maximus only had 5000 men.
__________________

Last edited 24 Jan 2009 09:38 pm by Conan
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 550
OFFLINE
G-LadRegular
Rep: 7
And leo had 300, that is not part of the argument.
leo was in the freezing cold by himself with nothing but pants and a sharp stick when he was 12 - 15 and still continues to walk around with no shirt on.
After being hit by 4 arrows he still stood up and his partner (can’t remember his name) was stabbed through the body by 3 swords and this was all the way through and stil took dow all three immortals which were called that because they were that good in combat.
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,338
OFFLINE
ConanUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38
G-Lad wrote:
And leo had 300, that is not part of the argument.
leo was in the freezing cold by himself with nothing but pants and a sharp stick when he was 12 - 15 and still continues to walk around with no shirt on.
After being hit by 4 arrows he still stood up and his partner (can’t remember his name) was stabbed through the body by 3 swords and this was all the way through and stil took dow all three immortals which were called that because they were that good in combat.
Walking around with no shirt on now is just a weakness against Maximus.
And that was his partner, his partner whose son had died and was powered by rage.
__________________

Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,338
OFFLINE
ConanUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38
Bump
__________________
