King Boo wrote:
An example of a universal agreement. Cid, see how the debaters agree on the winner? They state that they agree, therefore the thread was locked because of universal agreement.
1. supersaynboy doesn’t seem to agree with you guys and was still debating when you locked the thread against you.
2. Only 83 pages long so it breaks your 7th rule.
needs to be 100 posts not pages. And supersyinboy had left the debate long before the end.
False.
Thread Locked: 02 Feb 2009 05:42 pm
Last post by supersyinboy: 02 Feb 2009 05:34 pm
His last post was 8 minutes before the thread was locked. 8 minutes doesn’t count as “long before the end” in my book.
How often was he posting in the thread?
I wasn’t a part of the debate so I don’t know for certain, but it does look like he was fairly active. It’s fairly safe to say that you just cock blocked his opinion then put the outcome you wanted up in this thread. The same thing you are trying to do with Cid, but using restriction to this thread as your method.
I’d like to make a motion that this thread be closed due to incompetence in the owner and an obvious bias tilt towards certain fighters, all in favor?
I promise I’m not being bias. There was absolutely no agreement in that thread!
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
King Boo wrote:
An example of a universal agreement. Cid, see how the debaters agree on the winner? They state that they agree, therefore the thread was locked because of universal agreement.
1. supersaynboy doesn’t seem to agree with you guys and was still debating when you locked the thread against you.
2. Only 83 pages long so it breaks your 7th rule.
needs to be 100 posts not pages. And supersyinboy had left the debate long before the end.
False.
Thread Locked: 02 Feb 2009 05:42 pm
Last post by supersyinboy: 02 Feb 2009 05:34 pm
His last post was 8 minutes before the thread was locked. 8 minutes doesn’t count as “long before the end” in my book.
How often was he posting in the thread?
I wasn’t a part of the debate so I don’t know for certain, but it does look like he was fairly active. It’s fairly safe to say that you just cock blocked his opinion then put the outcome you wanted up in this thread. The same thing you are trying to do with Cid, but using restriction to this thread as your method.
I’d like to make a motion that this thread be closed due to incompetence in the owner and an obvious bias tilt towards certain fighters, all in favor?
I promise I’m not being bias. There was absolutely no agreement in that thread!
I looked over the thread in question Boo, there was a definite consensus in it. I have seen DBZ fan boys act this way in the past so I am really not surprised by your actions. My advice to you is that you add the results of that debate to your list before I report you for mis-using what should be an information only thread like this for your own personal interests. Watch and see how many minutes it takes before the thread gets locked and thrown into the Testing Forum.
__________________
THE KING HAS RETURNED!
Last edited 14 Jun 2009 02:33 am by The King of MVC
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
King Boo wrote:
An example of a universal agreement. Cid, see how the debaters agree on the winner? They state that they agree, therefore the thread was locked because of universal agreement.
1. supersaynboy doesn’t seem to agree with you guys and was still debating when you locked the thread against you.
2. Only 83 pages long so it breaks your 7th rule.
needs to be 100 posts not pages. And supersyinboy had left the debate long before the end.
False.
Thread Locked: 02 Feb 2009 05:42 pm
Last post by supersyinboy: 02 Feb 2009 05:34 pm
His last post was 8 minutes before the thread was locked. 8 minutes doesn’t count as “long before the end” in my book.
How often was he posting in the thread?
I wasn’t a part of the debate so I don’t know for certain, but it does look like he was fairly active. It’s fairly safe to say that you just cock blocked his opinion then put the outcome you wanted up in this thread. The same thing you are trying to do with Cid, but using restriction to this thread as your method.
I’d like to make a motion that this thread be closed due to incompetence in the owner and an obvious bias tilt towards certain fighters, all in favor?
I promise I’m not being bias. There was absolutely no agreement in that thread!
I looked over the thread in question Boo, there was a definite consensus in it. I have seen DBZ fan boys act this way in the past so I am really not surprised by your actions. My advice to you is that you add the results of that debate to your list before I report you for mis-using what should be an information only thread like this for your own personal interested. Watch and see how many minutes it takes before the thread gets locked and thrown into the Testing Forum.
I add threads that are in agreement though. This isn’t what this is supposed to be for. I’d happily add it if it followed the rules I made for the thread. But if it’s going to cause this much trouble I minds well add it to make everyone happy, it doesn’t belong though.
King Boo wrote:
An example of a universal agreement. Cid, see how the debaters agree on the winner? They state that they agree, therefore the thread was locked because of universal agreement.
1. supersaynboy doesn’t seem to agree with you guys and was still debating when you locked the thread against you.
2. Only 83 pages long so it breaks your 7th rule.
needs to be 100 posts not pages. And supersyinboy had left the debate long before the end.
False.
Thread Locked: 02 Feb 2009 05:42 pm
Last post by supersyinboy: 02 Feb 2009 05:34 pm
His last post was 8 minutes before the thread was locked. 8 minutes doesn’t count as “long before the end” in my book.
How often was he posting in the thread?
I wasn’t a part of the debate so I don’t know for certain, but it does look like he was fairly active. It’s fairly safe to say that you just cock blocked his opinion then put the outcome you wanted up in this thread. The same thing you are trying to do with Cid, but using restriction to this thread as your method.
I’d like to make a motion that this thread be closed due to incompetence in the owner and an obvious bias tilt towards certain fighters, all in favor?
I promise I’m not being bias. There was absolutely no agreement in that thread!
I looked over the thread in question Boo, there was a definite consensus in it. I have seen DBZ fan boys act this way in the past so I am really not surprised by your actions. My advice to you is that you add the results of that debate to your list before I report you for mis-using what should be an information only thread like this for your own personal interested. Watch and see how many minutes it takes before the thread gets locked and thrown into the Testing Forum.
I add threads that are in agreement though. This isn’t what this is supposed to be for. I’d happily add it if it followed the rules I made for the thread. But if it’s going to cause this much trouble I minds well add it to make everyone happy, it doesn’t belong though.
You really should. Because I’m about half way through writing up a post for the feedback forum on why this thread should be removed from the VS. Forum due to misuse by it’s owner. Clock is ticking, you better act fast.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
I have a life to tend to. Work to do, girlfriend to take out, things like that. Just because I disappear for a few days doesn’t mean I’m done. And that’s why your entire method is stupid. Because somebody is going to come back and pissy that the debate was called just because they had to go to school or work.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
So you requested that the thread be locked before “a consensus could be reached” that was not specifically in your favor and then after it was locked you adamantly refused to add it to the official list of completed threads.
This is a prime example of abuse in power and should be taken into serious consideration should this thread remain open.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
I have a life to tend to. Work to do, girlfriend to take out, things like that. Just because I disappear for a few days doesn’t mean I’m done. And that’s why your entire method is stupid. Because somebody is going to come back and pissy that the debate was called just because they had to go to school or work.
It’s better than random locking since one feels one has a better argument. And I wasn’t going to add it, since obviously, there was NO agreement between me a you at the end of the thread. BTW I added it anyway, due to the King’s threat.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
So you requested that the thread be locked before “a consensus could be reached” that was not specifically in your favor and then after it was locked you adamantly refused to add it to the official list of completed threads.
This is a prime example of abuse in power and should be taken into serious consideration should this thread remain open.
I was not going to add it here. Not all locked threads are added here.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
So you requested that the thread be locked before “a consensus could be reached” that was not specifically in your favor and then after it was locked you adamantly refused to add it to the official list of completed threads.
This is a prime example of abuse in power and should be taken into serious consideration should this thread remain open.
I was not going to add it here. Not all locked threads are added here.
Well then, you have an interesting problem on your hands. Segregation is considered a form of discrimination no matter the cause or effect. Even if you have the best of intentions, I can still report you to the moderating team for it.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
So you requested that the thread be locked before “a consensus could be reached” that was not specifically in your favor and then after it was locked you adamantly refused to add it to the official list of completed threads.
This is a prime example of abuse in power and should be taken into serious consideration should this thread remain open.
I was not going to add it here. Not all locked threads are added here.
Well then, you have an interesting problem on your hands. Segregation is considered a form of discrimination no matter the cause or effect. Even if you have the best of intentions, I can still report you to the moderating team for it.
It’s not the purpose of the thread to add all locked threads. Only the ones that don’t break the rules on the first page.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
I have a life to tend to. Work to do, girlfriend to take out, things like that. Just because I disappear for a few days doesn’t mean I’m done. And that’s why your entire method is stupid. Because somebody is going to come back and pissy that the debate was called just because they had to go to school or work.
It’s better than random locking since one feels one has a better argument. And I wasn’t going to add it, since obviously, there was NO agreement between me a you at the end of the thread. BTW I added it anyway, due to the King’s threat.
Chibi made a judgement call because the Broly side of the argument was not only FLAMING but was also ignoring LOGIC and disregarding CREATOR COMMENTS.
A real debate, being judged by a real debate committee, would have called it just like chibi because of the EXTREMELY poor representation on Broly’s side. This is why the debate council for the VS forums was such a good idea. Instead of relying upon fanboys to actually not be fanboys you relied upon a small group to accurately judge a debate.
The King of MVC wrote:
Sephiroth(No Universal Agreement)
^Still not acceptable Boo^
Discrimination is still discrimination no matter how much you may disguise it to appear otherwise.
But it doesn’t have it. But since it’s easy to sway the authority here, I’ll change it due to your frightening black mail.
Heh, now I’m going to make a personal note Boo. The thing about blackmail, it only really works when the person you are blackmailing has something to hide.
What are you trying to hide here Boo? Are you really so afraid of moderators coming in to investigate your thread? This reeks of corruption. I’m half tempted to report you anyways just to see if the mod team can get to the bottom of it and figure out exactly what is and isn’t appropriate in this situation.
Indalecio wrote:
Also King Boo, what did you plan on doing in Cid’s absence when you told me I should lock the thread, whenever the thread was on hold that is. Before Cid came back. Would you have added the thread then?
lmao.
He seriously PM’d you in my absence and told you to lock the thread?
You weren’t posting in it, I thought you were done. And that really doesn’t have anything to do with this thread, but you seemed like you had stopped. I even bumped it to try to get you to post.
I have a life to tend to. Work to do, girlfriend to take out, things like that. Just because I disappear for a few days doesn’t mean I’m done. And that’s why your entire method is stupid. Because somebody is going to come back and pissy that the debate was called just because they had to go to school or work.
It’s better than random locking since one feels one has a better argument. And I wasn’t going to add it, since obviously, there was NO agreement between me a you at the end of the thread. BTW I added it anyway, due to the King’s threat.
Chibi made a judgement call because the Broly side of the argument was not only FLAMING but was also ignoring LOGIC and disregarding CREATOR COMMENTS.
A real debate, being judged by a real debate committee, would have called it just like chibi because of the EXTREMELY poor representation on Broly’s side. This is why the debate council for the VS forums was such a good idea. Instead of relying upon fanboys to actually not be fanboys you relied upon a small group to accurately judge a debate.
You keep debating till the fanboys leave then. Even though there fanboys, and may be horrible debaters, they still are debaters.
I’d happily add it if it followed the rules I made for the thread. But if it’s going to cause this much trouble I minds well add it to make everyone happy, it doesn’t belong though.
