Both very good trilogies; both very epic conclusions. Both have amazing battles. But which is better?
And no saying matrix because Neo kicks Frodo’s ass. We all know that... pussy ass frodo....
__________________
I am a Servant of the Shadow, Minion of the Great Eye.
Sauron has wone the Master Chief vs Sauron debate.
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 21,788
OFFLINE
Red_Calibur9this'll take some getting used to
Rep: 91
Haven’t seen either, 'cept the first LotR movie.
__________________
Some people just don’t understand the Golden Rule.
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,780
OFFLINE
NEREVAR117Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 71
Wow, thats actually a really hard decision.
LOTR had a more wow and epic feel to it. But some of the Matrix’s fighting was simply teh fuggin awsum.
I cannot decide.
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 4,480
OFFLINE
Kyle KnightUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 23
LOTR 1-2 were great th third sucked major ass Matrix 1 was amazing 2-3 sucked ass in comparison so LOTR i surpose...nahhh Neo is the 1
__________________
“It’s Ironic how life is an endless pursuit of dream’s and yet we only find that dream in the eternal rest that awaits at the end of our journey through life..."
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 7,296
OFFLINE
GplexNonsense won't be tolerated
Rep: 72
Matrix 1 was the best the rest suck, including lotr.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

???
I think that LOTR was better all around, but I’m surprised, how did the third one suck? I thought it was pretty good, although even with the extended edition, a few things from the book were left out.
Matrix was definetely good though.
__________________
I am a Servant of the Shadow, Minion of the Great Eye.
Sauron has wone the Master Chief vs Sauron debate.